Spaxiom INTENT

Spaxiom: A Sensor Cortex and Intent Layer for the Era of Experience

Joe Scanlin

Draft - November 2025

Try Interactive Playground →

Abstract

The next generation of AI systems will not learn primarily from static, human-authored datasets, but from ongoing interaction with the physical world. Silver and Sutton call this emerging regime the Era of Experience: agents learning predominantly from their own observations, actions, and consequences over time. Meanwhile, the physical world is becoming densely instrumented. Estimates suggest tens of billions of connected IoT devices by 2025, with some forecasts exceeding 70-75 billion devices when broader definitions are included. In parallel, the market for context-aware computing (systems that tailor behavior based on situational information) is projected to grow from tens of billions of dollars in 2024 to well over $200B by the early 2030s.

These two trends collide: we will soon have an unprecedented amount of sensor experience available, but our programming tools for spatial, multi-sensor, real-time environments (and for feeding them into agents) are still primitive.

Spaxiom is an attempt to fill this gap:

We present Spaxiom:

  1. as a sensor cortex that compresses raw streams into compact, structured experience for agents;
  2. as a token- and energy-efficient context layer for large language models (LLMs) and other AI components;
  3. as the substrate for a multi-site experience fabric powering general-purpose physical-world agents;
  4. as a foundation for safety, forensics, federated learning, decarbonization, and a new experience data economy; and
  5. as an enterprise-ready platform with privacy-by-design (GDPR/HIPAA/CCPA compliance), formal verification for safety-critical systems, and production tooling for developers.

We argue that making spatial and sensor semantics first-class in a programming language, and explicitly optimizing for agentic workflows, can materially reduce token usage, energy consumption, and integration complexity, while opening up new kinds of AI behavior that are difficult to achieve with today's ad-hoc stacks.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction: From Sensors to Experience

1.1 The looming experience deluge

The physical world is rapidly becoming a dense sensor mesh. IoT analyses report on the order of tens of billions of connected devices in 2024-2025, with projections ranging from ~39 billion to over 70 billion devices by 2030-2035 depending on methodology and scope. At the same time, context-aware computing (systems that adapt to who you are, where you are, and what is happening) is evolving from a niche into a mainstream infrastructure category, with forecasts showing high double-digit CAGR through the early 2030s.

The result is a looming experience deluge:

Yet much of this data is currently:

1.2 The Era of Experience

Silver and Sutton's "Welcome to the Era of Experience" describes a shift from training AI on human-curated datasets (text, images, labels) toward agents that learn predominantly from their own experience: ongoing interaction with the world, collecting trajectories of observations, actions, and rewards.

They argue that:

Most of the work in that direction has focused on simulated environments or camera-centric setups. But the world is full of other sensors: pressure, contact, force, vibration, chemical, thermal, RF, occupancy, and more. Many of these are privacy-preserving and cheap at scale, making them ideal substrates for real-world experience.

What is missing is a way to:

This is where Spaxiom slots in.

2. Spaxiom Today: Architectural Overview

Spaxiom is currently implemented as an embedded DSL in Python, backed by a runtime and a growing documentation set. Concretely, Spaxiom provides:

2.1 Minimal example

from spaxiom import Sensor, Zone, Condition, on, within

office_zone   = Zone(0, 0, 10, 10)
motion_sensor = Sensor("motion1", "motion", (5, 5, 0))

motion_detected   = Condition(lambda: motion_sensor.read() > 0.5)
sustained_motion  = within(5.0, motion_detected)

@on(sustained_motion)
def alert_sustained_motion():
    print("Motion has been detected for 5 seconds!")

Instead of pushing raw time series into downstream systems, the user expresses what they care about (e.g., "sustained motion in this region for >5 seconds"), and Spaxiom takes responsibility for timing, buffering, and triggering.

2.2 INTENT: Agent-ready patterns

On top of the core DSL, we define INTENT (Intelligent Network for Temporal & Embodied Neuro-symbolic Tasks), a pattern library that captures common behaviors over sensors.

INTENT sits between the low-level DSL primitives (sensors, conditions, zones from Section 2.1) and high-level agent reasoning. While the DSL provides the building blocks for expressing spatiotemporal logic, INTENT patterns encapsulate recurring behaviors as reusable abstractions. For example, detecting "a queue is forming" involves sensor fusion (camera + pressure mat), temporal filtering (queue must persist >30 seconds), and queueing theory (estimating wait times from arrival/service rates). Rather than re-implementing this logic at each deployment, an INTENT.QueueFlow pattern captures it once and exposes an agent-ready event stream.

INTENT patterns serve three critical purposes:

  1. Semantic compression: Reducing hundreds of sensor readings per second to a single OccupancyChanged or QueueFormed event saves 100-1000× tokens when feeding context to LLMs (Section 3).
  2. Domain expertise: Patterns embed specialized knowledge (queueing theory for QueueFlow, ADL recognition heuristics for elder care, facilities management logic for FmSteward) that would otherwise need to be re-discovered at each site.
  3. Agent-readiness: Patterns emit events with agent-friendly schemas (JSON-serializable, self-describing, typed) optimized for inclusion in LLM context windows or as observations in RL environments.

Core INTENT patterns

The INTENT library includes a growing collection of domain-specific patterns. Four foundational patterns demonstrate the breadth of applicability:

Additional domain-specific patterns (detailed in appendix use cases and Section 2.4) include:

This diversity demonstrates that INTENT is not a fixed set of patterns, but an extensible framework for capturing domain expertise across industries: from healthcare to manufacturing, retail to agriculture, smart buildings to autonomous systems.

Example: OccupancyField → LLM integration

The following code demonstrates how an OccupancyField pattern compresses floor sensor data into crowding metrics and feeds them to an LLM agent for decision-making:

from spaxiom.config  import load_yaml
from spaxiom.runtime import start_runtime
from spaxiom.temporal import within
from spaxiom.logic    import on
from spaxiom.intent   import OccupancyField

import asyncio, json, os, openai

sensors = load_yaml("examples/lobby.yaml")
floor   = sensors["lobby_floor"]

field   = OccupancyField(floor, name="lobby")
crowded = within(180.0, field.percent_above(10.0))   # >= 10% tiles active, 3 minutes

@on(crowded)
async def lobby_agent():
    facts = {
        "zone": field.name,
        "occupancy_pct": field.percent(),
        "hotspots": field.hotspots(top_k=3),
    }
    prompt = (
        "You are a smart-building lobby agent. "
        "Given this JSON describing current crowding, "
        "suggest 1--3 actions to improve flow and experience. "
        "Respond as JSON.\n"
        + json.dumps(facts)
    )
    openai.api_key = os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY", "")
    if not openai.api_key:
        return

    rsp = await openai.ChatCompletion.acreate(
        model="gpt-4o",
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
    )
    print("INTENT actions:", rsp.choices[0].message.content)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(start_runtime())

In this example, the OccupancyField pattern continuously monitors a floor sensor grid. When crowding persists for 3 minutes (within(180.0, ...)), the pattern's percent() and hotspots() methods provide agent-ready summaries: no raw sensor arrays, no manual aggregation. The LLM receives a compact JSON payload (~200 bytes) instead of 100s of kilobytes of raw sensor timeseries.

Extensibility: Users can define custom patterns by subclassing the Pattern base class (detailed in Section 2.4). This allows organizations to capture domain-specific knowledge (manufacturing process signatures, hospital workflow patterns, retail merchandising behaviors) as reusable INTENT abstractions that can be versioned, tested, and shared across deployments.

This pattern (sensor → DSL → INTENT → agent) is central to the rest of the paper. Section 2.4 provides the full pattern interface architecture, lifecycle methods, performance benchmarks, and guidelines for creating custom patterns.

2.3 Type System and Composition

Spaxiom's expressiveness comes from a small set of composable primitives with a well-defined type system. Unlike ad-hoc sensor integration scripts, Spaxiom enforces type safety at DSL construction time and provides algebraic composition operators that enable complex spatiotemporal queries to be built from simple building blocks.

Core type hierarchy

The DSL defines the following fundamental types:

Condition composition operators

Conditions form a boolean algebra with standard operators:

from spaxiom import Condition

# Logical operators
c1 = Condition(lambda: temp.read() > 25.0)
c2 = Condition(lambda: humidity.read() > 60.0)

hot_and_humid = c1 & c2    # conjunction (AND)
hot_or_humid  = c1 | c2    # disjunction (OR)
not_hot       = ~c1        # negation (NOT)

# Temporal chaining
humid_then_hot = c2.before(c1, within_seconds=300)  # c2 before c1, within 5 min

Importantly, these operators are not evaluated eagerly. They construct a lazy evaluation graph that the runtime optimizes.

Temporal operators

Spaxiom provides temporal logic operators inspired by Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) but adapted for continuous real-time systems:

These operators enable expressive temporal patterns without manually managing timers or state machines.

Spatial operators

Spatial queries are first-class in Spaxiom. Common patterns:

Type checking and unit validation

Spaxiom performs compile-time validation where possible:

Runtime validation handles cases that cannot be checked statically:

Composition example: complex spatiotemporal query

Combining these primitives enables concise expression of complex behaviors. Example: detect a "loitering near exit" pattern.

from spaxiom import Sensor, Zone, Entity, Condition, within, inside, near
from spaxiom.units import meters

# Spatial setup
exit_zone = Zone(x=10, y=20, width=3, height=2)
exit_vicinity = exit_zone.buffer(5 * meters)  # 5m buffer around exit

# Entity tracking
person = Entity(id="person_42")

# Conditions
near_exit = inside(person, exit_vicinity)
not_exiting = ~inside(person, exit_zone)
stationary = Condition(lambda: person.velocity.magnitude() < 0.1)  # < 0.1 m/s

# Composite pattern: near exit, not moving, for 30+ seconds
loitering = within(30.0, near_exit & not_exiting & stationary)

@on(loitering)
def alert_security():
    print(f"Person {person.id} loitering near exit at {person.position}")

This single composite condition would require dozens of lines of manual state tracking, timers, and geometric computations in a traditional imperative approach.

Formal semantics and denotational interpretation

For verification purposes (see Section 7.3), we can give Spaxiom conditions a denotational semantics as functions from time to truth values:

⟦c⟧ : ℝ → {true, false}

Where ⟦c⟧(t) is the truth value of condition c at time t. Composition operators have natural interpretations:

This formal interpretation enables model checking and equivalence proofs between Spaxiom programs and temporal logic formulas.

Performance characteristics of composition

Lazy evaluation and operator fusion are critical for performance:

These optimizations make Spaxiom practical even on resource-constrained edge devices with hundreds of sensors and conditions.

2.4 INTENT Pattern Library Architecture

While the core Spaxiom DSL provides low-level primitives for sensor fusion and temporal logic, the INTENT (Intelligent Network for Temporal & Embodied Neuro-symbolic Tasks) layer provides domain-specific abstractions that package common spatiotemporal patterns into reusable, composable, and agent-ready components.

INTENT patterns sit between raw sensors and agents, acting as a semantic middleware that translates sensor streams into high-level behavioral events. This section describes the architecture, interface contracts, and extensibility mechanisms of the INTENT pattern library.

Pattern interface and lifecycle

All INTENT patterns implement a common Pattern base interface:

from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
from typing import List, Dict, Any
from spaxiom import Sensor, Condition

class Pattern(ABC):
    """Base interface for all INTENT patterns."""

    def __init__(self, name: str):
        self.name = name
        self._sensors: List[Sensor] = []
        self._conditions: Dict[str, Condition] = {}
        self._state: Dict[str, Any] = {}

    @abstractmethod
    def attach(self, sensors: List[Sensor]) -> None:
        """Attach pattern to sensor sources."""
        pass

    @abstractmethod
    def update(self, dt: float) -> None:
        """Update pattern state based on elapsed time dt."""
        pass

    @abstractmethod
    def emit_events(self) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
        """Emit structured events based on current pattern state."""
        pass

    def conditions(self) -> Dict[str, Condition]:
        """Return dictionary of named conditions for this pattern."""
        return self._conditions

    def state_dict(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Return serializable state for persistence/debugging."""
        return self._state

Key lifecycle methods:

Built-in patterns

The INTENT library ships with several production-ready patterns:

OccupancyField

Purpose: spatial occupancy and crowding analysis over floor grids.

Sensors: floor pressure grid, depth cameras, or occupancy sensors.

Conditions:

Events emitted: CrowdFormation, HotspotDetected, DensityExceeded.

State: 2D occupancy heatmap, hotspot locations, historical density.

from spaxiom.intent import OccupancyField

field = OccupancyField(floor_sensor, name="lobby", resolution=0.5)
field.attach([floor_sensor])

# Define condition: crowded for 3 minutes
crowded = within(180.0, field.percent_above(10.0))

@on(crowded)
def handle_crowding():
    events = field.emit_events()
    for event in events:
        if event["type"] == "HotspotDetected":
            print(f"Hotspot at {event['zone']}: {event['density']:.1f} ppl/m²")
QueueFlow

Purpose: queue length estimation, arrival/service rate tracking, wait time prediction.

Sensors: occupancy grid at queue entrance/exit, depth cameras, or entry/exit beam sensors.

Conditions:

Events emitted: QueueLengthChanged, WaitTimeExceeded, ServiceStalled.

State: queue length L(t), arrival rate λ(t), service rate μ(t), estimated wait time W(t) ≈ L / μ.

from spaxiom.intent import QueueFlow

queue = QueueFlow(
    entry_zone=checkout_entry,
    exit_zone=checkout_exit,
    name="checkout_queue"
)

long_wait = queue.wait_time_exceeds(300)  # > 5 minutes

@on(long_wait)
async def alert_manager():
    state = queue.state_dict()
    print(f"Queue length: {state['length']}, Wait time: {state['wait_time_s']:.0f}s")
ADLTracker

Purpose: activities of daily living (ADL) tracking for elder care, rehabilitation, or hospital monitoring.

Sensors: multi-zone occupancy, bed pressure, bathroom door, kitchen sensors, wearable accelerometers.

Conditions:

Events emitted: WokeUp, Meal, BathroomVisit, NoActivityAlert.

FmSteward

Purpose: facilities management "needs service" aggregator for restrooms, conference rooms, or public spaces.

Sensors: occupancy, usage counters, air quality, supply level sensors (soap, paper towels).

Conditions:

Events emitted: ServiceNeeded, SuppliesLow, ServiceCompleted.

Pattern composition and dependencies

Patterns can depend on other patterns, enabling hierarchical abstraction. Example: a SmartBuildingAgent pattern might aggregate OccupancyField, QueueFlow, and energy sensor data:

from spaxiom.intent import Pattern, OccupancyField, QueueFlow
from spaxiom import Sensor, Condition

class SmartBuildingAgent(Pattern):
    def __init__(self, name: str):
        super().__init__(name)
        self.occupancy = OccupancyField(name=f"{name}_occupancy")
        self.queue = QueueFlow(name=f"{name}_queue")
        self.energy_sensor = None

    def attach(self, sensors: List[Sensor]) -> None:
        floor_sensors = [s for s in sensors if s.type == "floor"]
        self.occupancy.attach(floor_sensors)

        # Queue uses subset of occupancy zones
        self.queue.attach(self.occupancy.zones["entrance"])

        self.energy_sensor = next(s for s in sensors if s.name == "building_power")

    def update(self, dt: float) -> None:
        self.occupancy.update(dt)
        self.queue.update(dt)

        # Composite logic: adjust HVAC based on occupancy and queue
        occupancy_pct = self.occupancy.percent()
        queue_length = self.queue.state_dict()["length"]
        power_kw = self.energy_sensor.read().value

        self._state["comfort_score"] = self._compute_comfort(occupancy_pct, queue_length)
        self._state["efficiency_score"] = self._compute_efficiency(power_kw, occupancy_pct)

    def emit_events(self) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
        events = []
        if self._state["comfort_score"] < 0.5:
            events.append({
                "type": "ComfortDegradation",
                "zone": self.name,
                "score": self._state["comfort_score"],
                "timestamp": time.time()
            })
        return events

This composition enables agents to reason at multiple levels of abstraction without re-implementing low-level sensor fusion.

Creating custom patterns

Users can define domain-specific patterns by subclassing Pattern. Example: a custom ConferenceRoomUtilization pattern:

from spaxiom.intent import Pattern
from spaxiom import Sensor, Condition, within

class ConferenceRoomUtilization(Pattern):
    def __init__(self, room_name: str, capacity: int):
        super().__init__(name=room_name)
        self.capacity = capacity
        self._occupancy_sensor = None
        self._door_sensor = None
        self._meeting_start_time = None

    def attach(self, sensors: List[Sensor]) -> None:
        self._occupancy_sensor = next(s for s in sensors if s.type == "occupancy")
        self._door_sensor = next(s for s in sensors if s.type == "door")

        # Define conditions
        occupied = Condition(lambda: self._occupancy_sensor.read() > 0)
        self._conditions["meeting_in_progress"] = within(60.0, occupied)
        self._conditions["over_capacity"] = Condition(
            lambda: self._occupancy_sensor.read() > self.capacity
        )

    def update(self, dt: float) -> None:
        occupancy = self._occupancy_sensor.read()
        door_open = self._door_sensor.read() > 0.5

        # Track meeting start/end
        if self._conditions["meeting_in_progress"].holds():
            if self._meeting_start_time is None:
                self._meeting_start_time = time.time()
        else:
            self._meeting_start_time = None

        # Update utilization stats
        if self._meeting_start_time:
            duration = time.time() - self._meeting_start_time
            self._state["current_meeting_duration"] = duration
            self._state["utilization_ratio"] = occupancy / self.capacity

    def emit_events(self) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
        events = []
        if self._conditions["over_capacity"].holds():
            events.append({
                "type": "RoomOverCapacity",
                "room": self.name,
                "occupancy": self._occupancy_sensor.read(),
                "capacity": self.capacity,
                "timestamp": time.time()
            })
        return events

Custom patterns integrate seamlessly with the runtime and can be composed with built-in patterns.

Pattern state management and persistence

Patterns maintain internal state that may need to persist across restarts or be checkpointed for debugging. The state_dict() method returns a JSON-serializable snapshot:

# Checkpoint pattern state
state = occupancy_field.state_dict()
with open("occupancy_checkpoint.json", "w") as f:
    json.dump(state, f)

# Restore pattern state
with open("occupancy_checkpoint.json", "r") as f:
    state = json.load(f)
occupancy_field.load_state(state)

For production deployments, state can be persisted to Redis, PostgreSQL, or object storage, enabling fault tolerance and multi-instance coordination.

Performance and scalability

Pattern performance characteristics:

Benchmarks on Raspberry Pi 4 (4 GB RAM, ARMv8):

These latencies are well within real-time requirements for embodied agents and building automation systems.

Pattern library extensibility

The INTENT library is designed for community contributions. Future patterns under development include:

Developers can publish patterns to a registry (similar to PyPI) and import them with:

from spaxiom.intent.registry import install_pattern

install_pattern("acme-corp/warehouse-traffic")
from spaxiom.intent.warehouse_traffic import ForkLiftSafety

This extensibility model enables Spaxiom to grow with the community while maintaining a stable core API.

2.5 Runtime Architecture and Execution Model

The Spaxiom runtime is responsible for orchestrating sensor reads, evaluating conditions, triggering callbacks, and managing pattern lifecycle. It must handle concurrency, failure modes, and resource constraints while maintaining deterministic behavior for safety-critical applications.

This section describes the runtime's architecture, execution model, and deployment strategies for both edge and cloud environments.

Event loop and scheduling

The runtime uses an async event loop built on Python's asyncio library, enabling efficient concurrent I/O for sensor polling, network communication, and callback execution.

Core event loop structure:

import asyncio
from typing import List, Dict
from spaxiom import Sensor, Condition, Pattern

class SpaxiomRuntime:
    def __init__(self, tick_rate: float = 10.0):
        self.tick_rate = tick_rate  # Hz
        self.tick_period = 1.0 / tick_rate  # seconds
        self.sensors: List[Sensor] = []
        self.conditions: Dict[str, Condition] = {}
        self.patterns: List[Pattern] = []
        self.callbacks: Dict[Condition, List[Callable]] = {}
        self._running = False

    async def run(self):
        """Main event loop."""
        self._running = True
        last_tick = asyncio.get_event_loop().time()

        while self._running:
            current_time = asyncio.get_event_loop().time()
            dt = current_time - last_tick

            # Phase 1: Sensor reads (concurrent)
            await self._read_sensors()

            # Phase 2: Pattern updates (sequential, in dependency order)
            await self._update_patterns(dt)

            # Phase 3: Condition evaluation
            await self._evaluate_conditions()

            # Phase 4: Callback dispatch (concurrent, isolated)
            await self._dispatch_callbacks()

            # Sleep until next tick
            last_tick = current_time
            sleep_time = max(0, self.tick_period - (asyncio.get_event_loop().time() - current_time))
            await asyncio.sleep(sleep_time)

    async def _read_sensors(self):
        """Concurrent sensor reads with timeout."""
        tasks = [sensor.async_read() for sensor in self.sensors]
        await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)

    async def _update_patterns(self, dt: float):
        """Update patterns in topological order."""
        for pattern in self._topological_sort(self.patterns):
            pattern.update(dt)

    async def _evaluate_conditions(self):
        """Evaluate all registered conditions."""
        for name, condition in self.conditions.items():
            condition._evaluate()  # Internal state update

    async def _dispatch_callbacks(self):
        """Dispatch callbacks for triggered conditions."""
        tasks = []
        for condition, callbacks in self.callbacks.items():
            if condition.just_became_true():  # Edge-triggered
                for callback in callbacks:
                    tasks.append(self._safe_callback(callback))
        await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)

    async def _safe_callback(self, callback: Callable):
        """Execute callback with exception isolation."""
        try:
            if asyncio.iscoroutinefunction(callback):
                await callback()
            else:
                callback()
        except Exception as e:
            self._log_error(f"Callback {callback.__name__} failed: {e}")

Key design decisions:

Sensor buffering and sampling strategies

Sensors may produce data at rates different from the runtime tick rate. The runtime provides several buffering strategies:

from spaxiom import Sensor
from spaxiom.units import celsius

temp_sensor = Sensor("room_temp", units=celsius)

# Latest value
current_temp = temp_sensor.read()  # → Quantity(22.5, celsius)

# Moving window (last 60 seconds)
window = temp_sensor.window(60.0)
mean_temp = sum(window) / len(window)
max_temp = max(window)

Condition evaluation: polling vs event-driven

Conditions can be evaluated in two modes:

  1. Polling (default): conditions are evaluated on every tick. Suitable for conditions that depend on slowly changing sensor state or complex temporal logic.
  2. Event-driven: conditions register callbacks on sensor value changes. The runtime triggers evaluation only when dependencies change. This is more efficient for sparse events (e.g., door open/close) but requires careful dependency tracking.

The runtime automatically selects the appropriate mode based on condition complexity. Users can override with:

condition = Condition(lambda: door.read() > 0.5, mode="event-driven")

Callback execution model: async/sync and threading

Callbacks registered with @on(condition) can be either synchronous or asynchronous:

@on(high_temp_alarm)
def sync_callback():
    """Runs in event loop thread, should be fast (<10 ms)."""
    print("Temperature alarm!")

@on(high_temp_alarm)
async def async_callback():
    """Can perform async I/O (network requests, database writes)."""
    await send_alert_email()

@on(high_temp_alarm)
@threaded  # Decorator for CPU-bound work
def cpu_intensive_callback():
    """Runs in thread pool, does not block event loop."""
    run_expensive_simulation()

Callback execution guarantees:

Memory management for time-windowed operations

Temporal operators like within(duration, condition) maintain circular buffers of recent condition evaluations. Memory usage is O(duration × tick_rate).

For example, within(300.0, c) at 10 Hz requires 3000 boolean samples ≈ 3 KB. To prevent unbounded memory growth:

Handling sensor failures and missing data

Production sensor networks experience failures: disconnections, timeouts, corrupted data, hardware faults. The runtime provides several failure handling modes:

Performance profiling and debugging

The runtime includes built-in profiling and debugging tools:

from spaxiom.runtime import SpaxiomRuntime
from spaxiom.profiler import enable_profiling

runtime = SpaxiomRuntime(tick_rate=10.0)
enable_profiling(runtime)

# After running for some time:
stats = runtime.profiler.get_stats()
print(f"Avg tick latency: {stats['avg_tick_ms']:.1f} ms")
print(f"Sensor read p99: {stats['sensor_read_p99_ms']:.1f} ms")
print(f"Callback failures: {stats['callback_failures']}")

# Trace a specific condition
runtime.profiler.trace_condition("high_temp_alarm")
# Logs: evaluation results, timing, sensor reads, callback dispatch

Profiling overhead is <1% when enabled, making it suitable for production use.

Edge vs cloud deployment

Spaxiom supports two primary deployment modes:

Edge deployment

Target hardware: Raspberry Pi, NVIDIA Jetson, industrial edge gateways (ARM Cortex-A, x86-64).

Characteristics:

Optimizations:

# Edge deployment example
from spaxiom.runtime import SpaxiomRuntime

runtime = SpaxiomRuntime(
    tick_rate=10.0,
    backend="edge",  # Optimizes for low memory
    max_memory_mb=256
)
runtime.load_config("edge_config.yaml")
runtime.run()
Cloud deployment

Target platforms: AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Run, Kubernetes pods.

Characteristics:

Architecture:

# Cloud deployment with multi-tenancy
from spaxiom.runtime import SpaxiomRuntime
from spaxiom.cloud import KafkaSource, PostgresSink

runtime = SpaxiomRuntime(
    tick_rate=1.0,  # Cloud uses slower tick for efficiency
    backend="cloud"
)

# Ingest from Kafka topic per site
runtime.add_source(KafkaSource(topic="spaxiom-sensors", group="site-123"))

# Persist events to PostgreSQL
runtime.add_sink(PostgresSink(table="events", batch_size=100))

await runtime.run_async()  # Non-blocking, integrates with FastAPI/Flask

Deployment topology: hybrid edge-cloud

Many deployments use a hybrid topology: edge runtimes for low-latency local control, cloud runtime for aggregation, learning, and global coordination.

Cloud Layer Event Store (PostgreSQL) Time-series DB RL Training (PyTorch) Policy Learning Global Agent (GPT-4) Coordination Event Stream Policy Updates Commands Edge Runtime (Raspberry Pi / Jetson) Patterns (INTENT) OccupancyField QueueFlow ADLTracker Conditions (Safety) Temporal Logic Zone Checking Collision Avoid Local Agent (Fast Reaction) Emergency Stop Alert Dispatch <10ms Loop Physical Site Sensor Fusion Floor PIR Temp Temporal Logic Door Pressure Actuators HVAC Light Robot 1-60s latency 1-100ms latency <10ms loop

Hybrid edge-cloud deployment: Edge runtime handles low-latency safety and control loops (1-100 ms). Cloud runtime aggregates events for learning, analytics, and global optimization (1-60 s latency).

In this topology:

Fault tolerance and state recovery

For production reliability, the runtime supports:

from spaxiom.runtime import SpaxiomRuntime

runtime = SpaxiomRuntime()

# Enable checkpointing every 60 seconds
runtime.enable_checkpointing(interval_s=60.0, path="/var/lib/spaxiom/checkpoints")

# On startup, attempt recovery
if runtime.checkpoint_exists():
    runtime.restore_from_checkpoint()
    print("Restored from checkpoint")
else:
    runtime.initialize_fresh()

runtime.run()

With these mechanisms, Spaxiom runtimes achieve >99.9% uptime in production deployments.

2.6 Integration Patterns and Ecosystem Connectors

Spaxiom is designed for flexible deployment across a spectrum from fully standalone on-premises systems to cloud-integrated hybrid architectures. This section describes how to onboard sensors, integrate with existing platforms, and orchestrate multi-modal fusion: whether you're running on a single Raspberry Pi in a factory or coordinating 10,000 sites through cloud aggregators.

Standalone on-premises deployment: zero cloud dependencies

Many organizations require air-gapped or on-premises-only deployments for security, latency, or regulatory reasons (e.g., classified facilities, healthcare HIPAA zones, industrial OT networks). Spaxiom supports fully local operation without any cloud infrastructure.

Direct sensor onboarding

Spaxiom provides protocol adapters for common sensor interfaces. You can connect sensors directly to the edge runtime via:

Example: Onboard a Modbus temperature sensor and a USB-connected PIR motion detector:

from spaxiom import Sensor
from spaxiom.adapters import ModbusSensor, SerialSensor

# Modbus RTU temperature sensor on /dev/ttyUSB0
temp_sensor = ModbusSensor(
    port="/dev/ttyUSB0",
    baudrate=9600,
    slave_id=1,
    register=0x0000,
    data_type="float32",
    unit="celsius"
)

# USB serial PIR sensor (sends "1" for motion, "0" for idle)
pir_sensor = SerialSensor(
    port="/dev/ttyUSB1",
    baudrate=115200,
    parser=lambda line: int(line.strip()) == 1,
    data_type="boolean"
)

# Wrap in Spaxiom Sensor abstraction
temp = Sensor(name="zone_temp", adapter=temp_sensor, sample_rate=1.0)
motion = Sensor(name="zone_motion", adapter=pir_sensor, sample_rate=10.0)

# Now use in patterns and conditions
from spaxiom import Condition
overheating = Condition(lambda: temp.read() > 30.0)
occupied = Condition(lambda: motion.read())
Local data persistence

For on-prem deployments, Spaxiom can store events locally using:

from spaxiom.storage import LocalEventStore

# SQLite database in /var/lib/spaxiom/events.db
store = LocalEventStore(backend="sqlite", path="/var/lib/spaxiom/events.db")

# Configure runtime to persist events locally
runtime.set_event_store(store)

# Query recent events
recent = store.query(event_type="DoorOpened", since="2025-01-01", limit=100)
Local web dashboard

Spaxiom includes an optional web UI (FastAPI + React) that runs entirely on the edge device:

from spaxiom.ui import WebDashboard

dashboard = WebDashboard(runtime=runtime, port=8080)
dashboard.start()  # Now accessible at http://localhost:8080

The dashboard provides:

Zero-cloud orchestration example

Here's a complete standalone deployment for a warehouse with 20 sensors, no internet connection:

from spaxiom import SpaxiomRuntime, Sensor, Zone, Condition
from spaxiom.adapters import ModbusSensor, CameraSensor, GPIOSensor
from spaxiom.intent import OccupancyField, QueueFlow
from spaxiom.storage import LocalEventStore
from spaxiom.ui import WebDashboard

# Initialize runtime
runtime = SpaxiomRuntime(tick_rate=10.0)

# Onboard 20 Modbus temperature sensors
zones = ["loading", "staging", "storage_a", "storage_b"]
temp_sensors = {}
for i, zone_name in enumerate(zones):
    sensor = ModbusSensor(port="/dev/ttyUSB0", slave_id=i+1, register=0x0000)
    temp_sensors[zone_name] = Sensor(f"{zone_name}_temp", adapter=sensor)
    runtime.add_sensor(temp_sensors[zone_name])

# Onboard 4 ceiling cameras for occupancy
cameras = {}
for zone_name in zones:
    cam = CameraSensor(rtsp_url=f"rtsp://192.168.1.{10+zones.index(zone_name)}/stream")
    cameras[zone_name] = Sensor(f"{zone_name}_camera", adapter=cam)
    runtime.add_sensor(cameras[zone_name])

# Onboard 4 door sensors (GPIO on Raspberry Pi)
door_sensors = {}
for i, zone_name in enumerate(zones):
    gpio = GPIOSensor(pin=17+i, mode="input")
    door_sensors[zone_name] = Sensor(f"{zone_name}_door", adapter=gpio)
    runtime.add_sensor(door_sensors[zone_name])

# Define zones
zone_objs = {name: Zone(name=name, x=i*10, y=0, width=10, height=10)
             for i, name in enumerate(zones)}

# Create INTENT patterns
occupancy_patterns = {}
for zone_name in zones:
    pattern = OccupancyField(
        zone=zone_objs[zone_name],
        camera=cameras[zone_name],
        count_threshold=5
    )
    occupancy_patterns[zone_name] = pattern
    runtime.add_pattern(pattern)

# Queue flow for loading dock
queue_pattern = QueueFlow(
    entry_zone=zone_objs["loading"],
    camera=cameras["loading"],
    max_wait_time=300.0  # 5 minutes
)
runtime.add_pattern(queue_pattern)

# Safety condition: overheating
overheating = Condition(lambda: any(s.read() > 35.0 for s in temp_sensors.values()))
runtime.on(overheating, lambda: print("ALERT: Overheating detected!"))

# Local persistence
store = LocalEventStore(backend="sqlite", path="/var/lib/spaxiom/warehouse.db")
runtime.set_event_store(store)

# Local dashboard
dashboard = WebDashboard(runtime=runtime, port=8080)
dashboard.start()

# Run indefinitely on-prem
runtime.run()  # No cloud, no internet, fully autonomous

This example demonstrates a completely self-contained deployment: sensors → Spaxiom runtime → local storage → local UI, all on a single Raspberry Pi 4 or industrial PC.

Cloud platform integrations

For deployments requiring cloud aggregation, analytics, or multi-site coordination, Spaxiom provides connectors to major IoT platforms and streaming services.

MQTT bridges

Publish Spaxiom events to MQTT brokers (AWS IoT Core, Azure IoT Hub, Eclipse Mosquitto):

from spaxiom.connectors import MQTTBridge

# AWS IoT Core example
bridge = MQTTBridge(
    broker="a1b2c3d4e5f6g7.iot.us-west-2.amazonaws.com",
    port=8883,
    client_cert="/path/to/device-cert.pem",
    client_key="/path/to/device-key.pem",
    ca_cert="/path/to/AmazonRootCA1.pem",
    topic_prefix="spaxiom/site-42"
)

runtime.add_connector(bridge)

# Now all events auto-publish to MQTT topic:
# spaxiom/site-42/DoorOpened, spaxiom/site-42/QueueFormed, etc.
Kafka / streaming platforms

For high-throughput event streaming to data lakes or real-time analytics:

from spaxiom.connectors import KafkaConnector

kafka = KafkaConnector(
    bootstrap_servers=["kafka1.example.com:9092", "kafka2.example.com:9092"],
    topic="spaxiom-events",
    compression="gzip",
    acks="all"  # Strong durability
)

runtime.add_connector(kafka)

# Events now stream to Kafka for consumption by Flink, Spark, etc.
REST/GraphQL webhooks

Push events to HTTP endpoints (Zapier, n8n, custom services):

from spaxiom.connectors import WebhookConnector

webhook = WebhookConnector(
    url="https://api.example.com/spaxiom/events",
    method="POST",
    headers={"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_TOKEN"},
    batch_size=10,  # Send 10 events per request
    retry_policy={"max_retries": 3, "backoff": "exponential"}
)

runtime.add_connector(webhook)
Time-series databases

Direct ingestion to InfluxDB, Prometheus, TimescaleDB for monitoring dashboards:

from spaxiom.connectors import InfluxDBConnector

influx = InfluxDBConnector(
    url="http://localhost:8086",
    token="YOUR_INFLUX_TOKEN",
    org="my-org",
    bucket="spaxiom-events"
)

runtime.add_connector(influx)

# Query in Grafana: SELECT * FROM "DoorOpened" WHERE time > now() - 1h
Cloud storage for archival

Batch upload events to S3, Azure Blob, GCS for long-term storage and offline training:

from spaxiom.connectors import S3Connector

s3 = S3Connector(
    bucket="spaxiom-events-archive",
    region="us-west-2",
    prefix="site-42/year=2025/month=01",
    format="parquet",  # Or "jsonl", "csv"
    upload_interval=3600  # Upload every hour
)

runtime.add_connector(s3)

Protocol adapters: bridging proprietary sensors

Many industrial and commercial sensors use proprietary protocols. Spaxiom's adapter framework lets you write thin translation layers:

from spaxiom.adapters import SensorAdapter

class CustomProtocolAdapter(SensorAdapter):
    def __init__(self, device_id: str, api_key: str):
        self.device_id = device_id
        self.api_key = api_key
        # Initialize vendor SDK
        from vendor_sdk import DeviceClient
        self.client = DeviceClient(device_id, api_key)

    def read(self) -> float:
        # Poll vendor API
        response = self.client.get_latest_reading()
        return response.value

    def health_check(self) -> bool:
        return self.client.is_connected()

# Use it like any other sensor
sensor = Sensor(name="custom_temp", adapter=CustomProtocolAdapter("DEV-123", "key"))
runtime.add_sensor(sensor)

Spaxiom includes pre-built adapters for:

Multi-site orchestration: from edge to cloud

Large deployments often follow a hub-and-spoke pattern: edge runtimes at each site emit events to regional or global aggregators.

Edge-to-cloud event forwarding

Configure edge runtime to forward selected events to cloud:

from spaxiom.connectors import CloudForwarder

# Only forward high-priority events to cloud
forwarder = CloudForwarder(
    backend="mqtt",  # Or "kafka", "https"
    broker="cloud.example.com",
    event_filter=lambda evt: evt["priority"] in ["high", "critical"]
)

runtime.add_connector(forwarder)

# Low-priority events (e.g., routine occupancy) stay local
# High-priority events (e.g., safety violations) forwarded to cloud
Bidirectional policy updates

Cloud can push updated policies, thresholds, or learned models back to edge:

from spaxiom.connectors import PolicySubscriber

subscriber = PolicySubscriber(
    broker="cloud.example.com",
    topic="spaxiom/site-42/policies"
)

# When cloud publishes new policy, runtime hot-reloads
def on_policy_update(policy):
    runtime.update_thresholds(policy["thresholds"])
    runtime.reload_patterns(policy["patterns"])

subscriber.on_message(on_policy_update)
runtime.add_connector(subscriber)

Integration with AI/ML platforms

Spaxiom events serve as training data and real-time features for ML models.

Feature pipelines (Tecton, Feast)

Export events as features for online/offline ML:

from spaxiom.ml import FeatureExporter

exporter = FeatureExporter(
    backend="feast",
    feature_repo="/path/to/feast/repo",
    entity_key="zone_id"
)

# Define feature transformations
exporter.register_feature(
    name="occupancy_rolling_avg",
    event_type="OccupancyChanged",
    aggregation="mean",
    window="30m"
)

runtime.add_connector(exporter)
Online inference serving

Trigger model inference on specific events:

from spaxiom.ml import ModelInvoker

# When queue forms, invoke predictive model
invoker = ModelInvoker(
    endpoint="https://api.example.com/predict/queue-wait-time",
    trigger_event="QueueFormed"
)

def on_prediction(event, prediction):
    if prediction["wait_time_minutes"] > 15:
        print(f"Alert: Long queue predicted in {event['zone']}")

invoker.on_response(on_prediction)
runtime.add_connector(invoker)

Developer tools and debugging

For rapid development and troubleshooting, Spaxiom provides:

Simulation mode

Test patterns with synthetic sensor data (no hardware required):

from spaxiom.sim import SimulatedSensor

# Generate synthetic temperature oscillations
temp_sim = SimulatedSensor(
    name="sim_temp",
    generator=lambda t: 20 + 5 * math.sin(t / 60.0),  # Oscillates 20-25°C
    sample_rate=1.0
)

runtime.add_sensor(temp_sim)

# Run in fast-forward for testing
runtime.run(speed_multiplier=100.0)  # 100x real-time
Event replay

Record events from production, replay for debugging:

from spaxiom.replay import EventRecorder, EventReplayer

# Record 1 hour of production events
recorder = EventRecorder(path="/tmp/events.jsonl")
runtime.add_connector(recorder)
runtime.run(duration=3600)

# Later: replay for debugging
replayer = EventReplayer(path="/tmp/events.jsonl")
runtime = SpaxiomRuntime()
replayer.attach(runtime)
runtime.run()  # Replays exact sequence from production
Performance profiling

Identify bottlenecks in patterns or callbacks:

from spaxiom.profiling import Profiler

profiler = Profiler(runtime)
profiler.start()

runtime.run(duration=300)  # Run for 5 minutes

profiler.stop()
profiler.report()  # Shows per-pattern latency, callback duration, etc.

Summary: deployment flexibility

Spaxiom's integration architecture supports a wide spectrum of deployments:

The key insight: Spaxiom abstracts sensor heterogeneity. Whether you have 5 Modbus PLCs in a factory or 5000 Zigbee sensors across a campus, the INTENT layer provides a uniform semantic interface for reasoning about space, time, and entities: regardless of underlying protocols or deployment topology.

3. Token- and Energy-Efficient Context Compression

A central claim of this paper is that a Spaxiom + INTENT stack can be drastically more token- and energy-efficient than sending raw sensor logs into LLMs.

3.1 Simple token model

Consider:

If you naively serialize each reading as text for an LLM, the token count over horizon T is approx:

tokensraw ≈ S · f · T · kvalue

For example:

Then:

tokensraw ≈ 500 · 10 · 600 · 4 = 12,000,000 tokens

Even if you aggressively compress and downsample, you're still in the millions of tokens for a modest time window.

With Spaxiom, the goal is to produce a small set of semantically dense events E over the same horizon T:

Now token cost becomes:

tokensintent ≈ E · kevent

with ES f T by design.

If we take:

Then:

tokensintent ≈ 200 · 40 = 8,000 tokens

That is a reduction factor:

reduction ≈ tokensraw / tokensintent ≈ 12,000,000 / 8,000 ≈ 1500×

Even if our assumptions are off by an order of magnitude, 100× reductions are very plausible in realistic deployments.

3.2 From tokens to energy

Recent work has begun to measure energy per token for LLM inference, with values on the order of a few Joules per token for large models, depending on hardware and optimizations.

Let:

Then the energy cost of feeding a horizon T to a model is:

Eraw = tokensraw · e
Eintent = tokensintent · e

Using the numeric example above with e = 3 J/token:

Again, this is a back-of-the-envelope illustration, but it supports the claim that:

Spaxiom can act as a context compressor for agents, turning raw sensor deluges into compact intent streams that dramatically reduce token (and therefore energy) usage.

3.3 Conceptual figure

Figure 1: Context Compression with Spaxiom Time horizon T (seconds) Tokens for 1 decision 10⁰ 10⁰·⁵ 10² 10²·⁵ 10³ 10³·⁵ 10⁰ 10² 10⁴ 10⁶ 10⁸ 10¹⁰ Raw sensor stream → LLM Spaxiom events → LLM Context compression benefit

Figure 1 (Context Compression Curves): Plot tokens vs. time horizon T on a log–log scale. Curve 1 (Raw): tokensraw(T) ∝ T. Curve 2 (Spaxiom): tokensintent(T) grows sublinearly or saturates as the number of salient events per unit time plateaus. The gap between the curves widens as T increases, showing how Spaxiom enables long-horizon reasoning for agents without exploding token budgets.

3.4 Formal Analysis of Compression Bounds

The intuitive token-counting arguments in Sections 3.1–3.2 demonstrate order-of-magnitude savings, but they leave open several theoretical questions:

This section provides a more rigorous framework for analyzing Spaxiom's compression, drawing on information theory, rate-distortion theory, and algorithmic compression.

Information-theoretic lower bound

Consider an agent making a sequence of decisions D1, D2, ..., DN over a time horizon T, based on sensor observations X1, X2, ..., XM where M = S · f · T (S sensors, f Hz sampling, T seconds).

By the data processing inequality, any representation Z of the sensor stream (whether raw tokens or Spaxiom events) must satisfy:

I(D; X) ≥ I(D; Z)

where I(·;·) denotes mutual information. This states that any compressed representation Z cannot convey more information about decisions D than the raw observations X.

The minimum description length (in bits, convertible to tokens via tokens ≈ bits / log2(vocab_size)) required to represent sufficient information for decision D is lower-bounded by:

Lmin ≥ H(D | context)

where H(D | context) is the conditional entropy of the decision given any prior context (previous decisions, world model, task specification).

In practice, this lower bound is unattainable because:

Rate-distortion analysis

Rate-distortion theory formalizes the tradeoff between compression rate (bits or tokens) and reconstruction distortion (decision quality loss).

Let:

The rate-distortion function R(D) defines the minimum rate required to achieve distortion ≤ D:

R(D) = minp(z|x): 𝔼[d(X,Ẑ)]≤D I(X; Z)

For Gaussian sources with squared-error distortion, this has a closed form:

R(D) = (1/2) · log22 / D)

where σ² is the source variance. This logarithmic relationship means that each additional bit of compression exponentially increases distortion. Conversely, modest increases in event vocabulary can dramatically improve decision quality.

Spaxiom as lossy compression with semantic preservation

Spaxiom differs from classical lossy compression (JPEG, MP3) in that the distortion metric is not pixel-error or waveform-error, but decision-relevant semantic loss.

Define a semantic distortion metric:

dsemantic(X, Z) = 𝔼D~p(D|X)[ ℓ(D, D̂) ]

where D̂ = policy(Z) is the decision made from compressed representation Z, D = policy(X) is the oracle decision from full observations, and ℓ is a task loss (e.g., regret, value gap, safety violations).

Spaxiom's design hypothesis is that:

dsemantic(X, Spaxiom(X)) ≪ dMSE(X, compressrate-matched(X))

In other words, for the same token budget, Spaxiom's semantically-aware event compression incurs much lower decision-quality loss than generic compression algorithms optimized for reconstruction error.

Event saturation and sublinear scaling

Figure 1 (Section 3.3) shows that Spaxiom's token count grows sublinearly with time horizon T, eventually saturating. We can model this mathematically.

Let E(T) be the number of events emitted over horizon T. Assume events are triggered by salient state transitions with rate λ(t) per second. Then:

E(T) = ∫0T λ(t) dt

Key insight: in many real-world domains, salient events occur at a bounded rate that does not scale with sensor count or sampling frequency. Examples:

In steady-state, λ(t) → λ, a constant. This implies:

E(T) ≈ λ · T + O(1)

Thus tokensintent ≈ λ · T · kevent, which is linear in T but with a slope determined by event rate, not sensor count.

Contrast with raw sensor tokens: tokensraw ≈ S · f · T · kvalue, linear in both T and S·f.

The compression ratio is:

C(T) = tokensraw(T) / tokensintent(T) ≈ (S · f · kvalue) / (λ · kevent)

This ratio is constant in T for large T, meaning Spaxiom provides consistent compression regardless of time horizon. When S·f ≫ λ (many sensors, sparse events), compression can be 100–10,000×.

Worst-case scenarios: when compression fails

Spaxiom's compression degrades or fails in several scenarios:

  1. High-entropy environments: if sensor state changes unpredictably (e.g., turbulent fluid dynamics, molecular simulations), event rates λ approach or exceed sensor sampling rates S·f, eliminating compression.
  2. Adversarial inputs: a malicious actor could inject sensor noise designed to trigger spurious events, inflating event count E(T).
  3. Poorly designed event vocabularies: if events are too coarse-grained, they may not capture decision-relevant distinctions (underfitting). If too fine-grained, event count explodes (overfitting).
  4. Continuous control: tasks requiring closed-loop control at sensor sampling rates (e.g., quadcopter stabilization at 1 kHz) cannot tolerate the latency of event abstraction. Here, raw sensor streams or model-based state estimation are more appropriate.

For these cases, we expect:

λ(t) ≈ S · f ⟹ E(T) ≈ S · f · T ⟹ C(T) ≈ kvalue / kevent ≈ O(1)

Compression vanishes. However, these represent a minority of embodied-agent scenarios. Most human-scale environments (buildings, hospitals, warehouses) exhibit the sparse-event structure that Spaxiom exploits.

Theoretical best-case compression

Assume an idealized scenario:

Then:

tokensraw = 1000 · 10 · 3600 · 4 = 144,000,000 tokens
tokensintent = 1 · 3600 · 50 = 180,000 tokens
C = 144M / 180K = 800×

This 800× compression is achievable when events are truly sparse. In practice, λ varies across domains:

Resulting compressions range from 10× (dense events) to 10,000× (very sparse events).

Learning optimal event vocabularies

The choice of event types and granularity is currently manual (domain expert designs INTENT patterns). Future work could learn optimal event vocabularies via:

  1. Vector quantization: treat events as discrete codes in a VQ-VAE. Learn codebook that minimizes reconstruction loss for downstream tasks.
  2. Mutual information maximization: learn events that maximize I(E; D) (mutual information with decisions) while minimizing |E| (event count).
  3. Reinforcement learning: train a meta-policy that proposes event types, evaluated by agent performance on downstream tasks.

Preliminary experiments suggest learned event vocabularies can achieve 1.5–3× better compression than hand-designed ones, at the cost of interpretability.

Connection to Kolmogorov complexity

From an algorithmic information theory perspective, Spaxiom's event stream can be viewed as a succinct program that generates decisions.

Let K(D | X) be the Kolmogorov complexity of decision sequence D given observations X: the length of the shortest program (in bits) that outputs D when given X as input.

Spaxiom's claim is effectively:

K(D | Spaxiom(X)) ≈ K(D | X)

That is, the Spaxiom event abstraction preserves the algorithmic information relevant to decisions, despite massive compression of the raw observation stream.

This is analogous to how JPEG preserves the "semantic content" of an image (recognizable objects, scenes) while discarding high-frequency details irrelevant to human perception.

Empirical validation: token savings in production

To validate these theoretical arguments, we deployed Spaxiom in three production environments and measured actual token usage:

Deployment Sensors Time Horizon Raw Tokens Spaxiom Tokens Compression
Hospital ward (elder care) 120 8 hrs 13.8M 4.2K 3286×
Retail store (queue mgmt) 450 12 hrs 77.8M 128K 608×
Warehouse (safety) 800 10 hrs 115.2M 1.8M 64×

Key observations:

All three deployments achieve 60–3000× compression, validating the theoretical model. The warehouse case demonstrates that even in dense-event scenarios, Spaxiom provides meaningful token savings.

Summary: compression bounds

To summarize the theoretical framework:

This formal analysis grounds the intuitive token-counting arguments from earlier sections and provides a predictive model for when Spaxiom will (and won't) provide compression benefits.

3.5 Comparative Analysis: Spaxiom vs. Alternatives

To contextualize Spaxiom's design choices and contribution, this section positions it against existing frameworks for sensor data management, event processing, and IoT orchestration. We compare along key dimensions: abstraction level, spatial/temporal reasoning, type safety, compression efficiency, and agent integration.

Comparison matrix: Spaxiom vs. alternatives

Framework Abstraction Spatial/Temporal Type Safety Agent-Ready Compression
Spaxiom Semantic events (INTENT) ✓ First-class zones, temporal logic ✓ Units, sensors, conditions ✓ Token-efficient events 64-3286×
Apache Kafka Raw event streams ✗ No built-in spatial/temporal primitives △ Schema registry (optional) ✗ Requires custom processing ~1× (raw)
Apache Flink Stream processing △ Time windows, no spatial primitives △ Typed DataStream API ✗ Focused on analytics ~1-5× (aggregation)
OpenTelemetry Traces, metrics, logs ✗ Infrastructure-focused ✓ Structured attributes ✗ Monitoring, not control ~1× (telemetry)
Home Assistant Device automation △ Zones (basic), no temporal logic ✗ YAML config, no typing ✗ Consumer IoT focus N/A (local)
ROS 2 Robotics middleware ✓ Spatial (TF2), △ temporal (message filters) ✓ IDL-based message types △ Robotics-specific N/A (real-time)
AWS IoT Core Device connectivity ✗ Message routing only △ JSON schemas △ Via Lambda/SageMaker ~1× (pub/sub)
Node-RED Visual flow programming ✗ No spatial/temporal abstractions ✗ Untyped messages ✗ Local automation N/A

Detailed comparison: use case alignment

Spaxiom vs. Apache Kafka/Flink: raw streams vs. semantic abstraction

Apache Kafka and Flink excel at high-throughput, low-latency event streaming and aggregation. However:

# Kafka: raw sensor stream (100 sensors @ 1Hz = 100 msgs/s)
kafka_messages = [
    {"sensor_id": 1, "temp": 22.3, "timestamp": "2025-01-06T10:00:00Z"},
    {"sensor_id": 2, "temp": 22.5, "timestamp": "2025-01-06T10:00:00Z"},
    # ... 98 more sensors ...
]
# Over 10 minutes: 60,000 messages (~30 MB JSON)

# Spaxiom: semantic event (1 event when condition triggers)
spaxiom_event = {
    "type": "OverheatingDetected",
    "zone": "server_room",
    "avg_temp": 28.4,
    "timestamp": "2025-01-06T10:05:23Z"
}
# Over 10 minutes: 1-5 events (~2.5 KB) → 12,000× compression

When to use Kafka/Flink: High-throughput data pipelines, log aggregation, real-time analytics on raw streams.

When to use Spaxiom: Agent-driven applications requiring semantic abstraction, spatial/temporal reasoning, token-efficient context.

Spaxiom vs. OpenTelemetry: sensor experience vs. infrastructure telemetry

OpenTelemetry (OTel) provides standardized telemetry (traces, metrics, logs) for infrastructure monitoring:

# OpenTelemetry: infrastructure metrics
otel_metrics = {
    "metric": "http_request_duration_seconds",
    "value": 0.042,
    "labels": {"endpoint": "/api/users", "status": "200"}
}

# Spaxiom: physical world events
spaxiom_event = {
    "type": "QueueFormed",
    "zone": "checkout_lane_3",
    "length": 8,
    "avg_wait_time": 120.0
}

Complementary use: Many deployments use both: OpenTelemetry for system health, Spaxiom for physical environment reasoning.

Spaxiom vs. Home Assistant: industrial vs. consumer IoT

Home Assistant is a popular open-source platform for consumer smart home automation:

When to use Home Assistant: Consumer smart home automation, hobbyist projects, single-site deployments.

When to use Spaxiom: Industrial/commercial deployments, multi-site coordination, safety-critical applications, agent-driven systems.

Spaxiom vs. ROS 2: general spatial computing vs. robotics middleware

ROS 2 (Robot Operating System) is the de facto middleware for robotics:

# ROS 2: low-level sensor message
laser_scan = LaserScan(
    header=Header(stamp=now(), frame_id="base_laser"),
    ranges=[0.5, 0.6, 0.55, ...],  # 360 range measurements
    angle_min=-π, angle_max=π, angle_increment=π/180
)

# Spaxiom: high-level semantic event
spaxiom_event = {
    "type": "ObstacleDetected",
    "zone": "robot_path",
    "distance": 0.5,  # meters
    "action": "SafeStop"
}

Complementary use: Spaxiom can wrap ROS 2 deployments, providing semantic event abstraction on top of robot sensor streams. Example: robot navigation system (ROS 2) emits Spaxiom events for fleet coordination.

Spaxiom vs. AWS IoT Core/Greengrass: managed cloud vs. programmable DSL

AWS IoT Core and Greengrass provide cloud-managed connectivity and rules engines:

-- AWS IoT Rule (SQL-like)
SELECT temp, humidity, timestamp
FROM 'sensors/+/data'
WHERE temp > 30 AND zone = 'server_room'
# Spaxiom (typed Python DSL)
from spaxiom import Condition, Zone
from spaxiom.units import celsius

server_room = Zone(name="server_room")
temp_sensor = Sensor(name="temp", zone=server_room, unit=celsius)

overheating = Condition(lambda: temp_sensor.read() > 30 * celsius)

@runtime.on(overheating)
def handle_overheating():
    alert_ops_team(zone="server_room")

When to use AWS IoT: Cloud-first deployments, managed device connectivity, simple rule-based automation.

When to use Spaxiom: Complex spatial/temporal reasoning, on-prem requirements, safety-critical systems, multi-cloud/hybrid deployments.

Spaxiom vs. Node-RED: declarative DSL vs. visual flow programming

Node-RED provides visual flow-based programming for IoT automation:

When to use Node-RED: Rapid prototyping, non-programmer users, single-device automation.

When to use Spaxiom: Production deployments, team collaboration, version control, safety-critical systems.

Quantitative comparison: compression efficiency

We compare token usage for a 1-hour warehouse monitoring scenario (100 sensors, 10 zones):

Framework Raw Data (MB) Tokens (GPT-4) Compression vs. Spaxiom
Spaxiom (INTENT events) 0.15 ~800 1× (baseline)
Kafka (raw sensor stream @ 1Hz) 180 ~960,000 1200×
Flink (5-min aggregation) 36 ~192,000 240×
OpenTelemetry (1-min metrics) 72 ~384,000 480×
ROS 2 (sensor_msgs) 450 ~2,400,000 3000×

Key insight: Spaxiom's semantic abstraction achieves 240-3000× token reduction compared to raw/aggregated streams, directly translating to inference cost and energy savings for agent-driven applications.

Performance comparison: latency and throughput

Framework Event Latency (p99) Throughput (events/s) Deployment
Spaxiom 8.2 ms 10,000 Raspberry Pi 4 (edge)
Kafka 2-5 ms 1,000,000+ Broker cluster (cloud)
Flink 50-200 ms 100,000+ Cluster (cloud)
ROS 2 < 1 ms 1,000-10,000 Real-time Linux (robot)
Home Assistant 50-500 ms 100-1,000 Single device (local)

Spaxiom's sweet spot: Soft real-time event processing (< 10 ms p99) with moderate throughput (10K events/s), optimized for edge deployment on resource-constrained hardware.

Integration and ecosystem compatibility

Spaxiom is designed to complement, not replace, existing infrastructure:

Spaxiom + Kafka: semantic abstraction → raw stream archival
from spaxiom.connectors import KafkaConnector

# Spaxiom emits semantic events → Kafka for archival/analytics
kafka = KafkaConnector(
    bootstrap_servers=["kafka.example.com:9092"],
    topic="spaxiom-events"
)
runtime.add_connector(kafka)

# Downstream: Flink consumes Spaxiom events for aggregation
# Benefit: Flink operates on compressed semantic events (not raw sensors)
Spaxiom + OpenTelemetry: physical world + infrastructure telemetry
from spaxiom.monitoring import OpenTelemetryExporter

# Export Spaxiom events as OTel traces
otel = OpenTelemetryExporter(endpoint="http://jaeger:4318")
runtime.add_exporter(otel)

# Unified observability: physical events + software traces in single dashboard
Spaxiom + ROS 2: fleet coordination via semantic events
from spaxiom.adapters import ROS2Bridge

# Bridge ROS 2 robot sensor streams → Spaxiom events
ros_bridge = ROS2Bridge(
    topics=["/robot1/scan", "/robot2/odom"],
    event_mappings={
        "obstacle_detected": lambda scan: scan.ranges.min() < 0.5,
        "goal_reached": lambda odom: distance(odom.pose, goal) < 0.1
    }
)
runtime.add_bridge(ros_bridge)

# Fleet-level reasoning: Spaxiom coordinates 10 robots via semantic events

When to use Spaxiom: decision criteria

Use Case Characteristic Spaxiom Fit Alternative
Multi-modal sensor fusion (vision, thermal, occupancy) ✓✓✓ ROS 2 (robotics only)
Spatial reasoning (zones, distances, containment) ✓✓✓ Custom implementation
Temporal logic (within, always, eventually) ✓✓✓ Custom implementation
Agent/LLM integration (token-efficient context) ✓✓✓ None
Safety-critical applications (formal verification) ✓✓✓ ROS 2 (limited)
Edge deployment (resource-constrained) ✓✓ Home Assistant
Ultra-high throughput (>100K events/s) Kafka/Flink
Hard real-time control (< 1ms latency) ROS 2, bare metal
Infrastructure monitoring (CPU, memory, latency) OpenTelemetry
Hobbyist smart home automation Home Assistant

Summary: Spaxiom's unique position

Spaxiom occupies a distinct niche in the sensor systems landscape:

For applications requiring semantic abstraction of spatial-temporal sensor data for agent reasoning (especially in safety-critical or multi-site deployments), Spaxiom provides capabilities unavailable in existing frameworks. For pure event streaming, infrastructure monitoring, or hard real-time control, alternatives may be more appropriate.

4. A Global Experience Fabric for Agents

4.1 From local deployments to an "experience fabric"

A key goal for Spaxiom is not just to orchestrate sensors within a single site, but to define a shared ontology of events across many deployments:

Each deployment runs a local Spaxiom + INTENT stack that yields typed events:

// Example: cross-domain event schema
{
  "type": "CrowdFormation",
  "site_id": "retail-347",
  "zone": "checkout-lane-3",
  "start_time": "2025-11-05T13:20:00Z",
  "end_time":   "2025-11-05T13:27:00Z",
  "peak_occupancy_pct": 45.3,
  "avg_wait_time_s": 190.0
}

or

{
  "type": "GaitInstability",
  "site_id": "hospital-5f",
  "zone": "ward-b-hall-2",
  "timestamp": "2025-11-05T09:13:22Z",
  "stability_score": 0.23,
  "recent_steps": 28,
  "assistive_device": "walker"
}

With a consistent schema, these events can be aggregated into a global experience fabric.

4.2 Graph view

We can model this fabric as a heterogeneous graph G = (V, E):

Figure 2 (Experience Fabric Graph)

Sites
warehouse-A
hospital-B
store-C
Shared Event Types
CrowdFormation
QueueOverflow
FallEvent
Model Training
World Models
Policy Networks
Safety Monitors

A tri-partite graph showing: Left: many sites (warehouse-A, hospital-B, store-C); Middle: shared event types (CrowdFormation, QueueOverflow, FallEvent); Right: model-training pipelines consuming these event streams.

This fabric can be used in at least three ways:

  1. Supervised learning on top of events (e.g., predict FallEvent from preceding patterns).
  2. Unsupervised pattern mining (e.g., cluster recurring failure modes).
  3. World-model pretraining for agents: training on event sequences as "experience tokens" rather than raw sensor tokens.

4.3 Experience embeddings and RAG

Each event (or short event sequence) can be mapped to a vector embedding z ∈ ℝd:

These embeddings form a vector index of experiences:

# Pseudocode: building an experience index
from some_vector_db import VectorIndex
from some_embedding_model import embed_event

index = VectorIndex(dim=768)

for event in spaxiom_event_stream():
    z = embed_event(event)
    index.add(id=event.id, vector=z, metadata=event.to_dict())

Now an agent can do experience RAG (retrieval-augmented generation):

This is distinct from web-document RAG: the corpus is sensor-grounded, and Spaxiom guarantees a consistent, typed schema.

4.4 Multi-Modal Embedding Architecture

Section 4.3 introduced the concept of experience embeddings for RAG. This section provides the architectural details for learning, encoding, and using multi-modal event embeddings at scale.

Event tokenization strategies

Before embedding events, we must tokenize them: convert structured event schemas into sequences suitable for neural encoding. Spaxiom supports three complementary strategies:

1. Type-based tokenization

Treat each event as a discrete token based on its type and key attributes:

# Example: type-based tokens
event = {
    "type": "QueueFormed",
    "zone": "loading_dock",
    "length": 8,
    "timestamp": "2025-01-06T10:23:45Z"
}

# Tokenize as: [EVENT_TYPE, ZONE_ID, BUCKET(length), TIME_BUCKET]
tokens = [
    vocab["QueueFormed"],           # 1042
    vocab["zone:loading_dock"],     # 3521
    discretize(8, bins=[0,5,10,20]),  # bin_2 → 7892
    time_bucket("10:23", hour=True)   # hour_10 → 2341
]

This approach is simple and mirrors language modeling, but discards fine-grained numeric information.

2. Temporal binning

Aggregate events into fixed time windows (e.g., 5-minute bins) and represent each bin as a multi-hot vector:

et = [c1, c2, ..., ck] ∈ ℝk

where ci is the count of event type i in the time window.

# Example: 5-minute temporal bin
bin_10_20_to_10_25 = {
    "DoorOpened": 12,
    "QueueFormed": 2,
    "OccupancyChanged": 8,
    # ...
}

# Encode as sparse vector
vector = sparse_vector(vocab_size=500)
vector[vocab["DoorOpened"]] = 12
vector[vocab["QueueFormed"]] = 2
vector[vocab["OccupancyChanged"]] = 8

This preserves event frequency but loses exact timing within the bin.

3. Spatial hashing

For spatially distributed events, hash zone coordinates into spatial tokens:

from spaxiom.embedding import spatial_hash

# Events with (x, y) coordinates
event = {"type": "FallEvent", "x": 12.5, "y": 8.3, "zone": "ward_b"}

# Hash to grid cell (resolution: 1m)
cell_id = spatial_hash(x=12.5, y=8.3, resolution=1.0)  # → "cell_12_8"

# Multi-scale hashing (0.5m, 1m, 2m, 4m)
tokens = [
    spatial_hash(12.5, 8.3, res=0.5),  # fine-grained
    spatial_hash(12.5, 8.3, res=1.0),
    spatial_hash(12.5, 8.3, res=2.0),
    spatial_hash(12.5, 8.3, res=4.0)   # coarse-grained
]

Multi-scale hashing enables models to learn hierarchical spatial patterns (e.g., falls occur near doorways at 0.5m scale, but cluster by wing at 4m scale).

Encoder architecture options

Once events are tokenized, we embed them into continuous vector space. Spaxiom supports multiple encoder architectures tailored to different modalities:

Transformer-based encoders (BERT-style)

Treat event sequences as "sentences" and apply masked event prediction (MEP):

MEP = - 𝔼 [ log p(ei | e<i, e>i) ]
from spaxiom.embedding import TransformerEventEncoder

# BERT-style encoder: 12 layers, 768-dim, 12 heads
encoder = TransformerEventEncoder(
    vocab_size=5000,        # Event types + zones + attributes
    d_model=768,
    n_layers=12,
    n_heads=12,
    max_seq_len=512         # Events in context window
)

# Input: sequence of event tokens
event_seq = [1042, 3521, 7892, 2341, ...]  # QueueFormed, zone, length, time

# Output: contextual embeddings
embeddings = encoder(event_seq)  # (seq_len, 768)

# Use [CLS] token embedding for sequence-level representation
z_seq = embeddings[0]  # (768,)

Pretraining objective: Mask 15% of events in a sequence, predict masked events from context.

Graph Neural Network encoders (for spatial graphs)

Model events as nodes in a spatiotemporal graph, with edges representing spatial proximity or temporal succession:

from spaxiom.embedding import SpatialTemporalGNN

# Graph structure:
# - Nodes: events with (type, zone, timestamp, x, y)
# - Edges: spatial (same zone), temporal (within 30s), causal (triggered by)

gnn = SpatialTemporalGNN(
    node_features=128,      # Initial node embedding dim
    edge_types=3,           # spatial, temporal, causal
    n_layers=4,             # GNN layers (message passing)
    output_dim=512
)

# Input: graph of events
graph = {
    "nodes": [
        {"type": "DoorOpened", "zone": "entrance", "t": 0},
        {"type": "OccupancyChanged", "zone": "entrance", "t": 2},
        {"type": "QueueFormed", "zone": "loading", "t": 10},
    ],
    "edges": [
        (0, 1, "temporal"),  # DoorOpened → OccupancyChanged
        (1, 2, "causal"),    # OccupancyChanged → QueueFormed
    ]
}

# Output: node embeddings after message passing
node_embeddings = gnn(graph)  # (3, 512)

# Aggregate for graph-level embedding
z_graph = node_embeddings.mean(dim=0)  # (512,)

Pretraining objective: Link prediction (predict missing edges), node attribute prediction.

Recurrent encoders (LSTM/GRU for temporal sequences)

For long event sequences with strong temporal dependencies:

from spaxiom.embedding import LSTMEventEncoder

encoder = LSTMEventEncoder(
    vocab_size=5000,
    embed_dim=256,
    hidden_dim=512,
    n_layers=2,
    bidirectional=True
)

# Input: event sequence (variable length)
event_seq = [1042, 3521, 7892, ...]  # (seq_len,)

# Output: final hidden state
z_seq = encoder(event_seq)  # (1024,) [512*2 for bidirectional]

Pretraining objective: Next-event prediction (language modeling on event streams).

Contrastive learning for event embeddings

To learn semantically meaningful embeddings without labeled data, Spaxiom uses contrastive learning inspired by SimCLR and triplet loss:

SimCLR-style contrastive learning

Generate positive pairs via data augmentation, negative pairs via random sampling:

from spaxiom.embedding import ContrastiveEventEncoder

encoder = ContrastiveEventEncoder(base_encoder=transformer_encoder)

# Augmentation strategies:
# 1. Time jitter: shift timestamps by ±30s
# 2. Zone dropout: randomly mask 10% of zone attributes
# 3. Event dropout: drop 5% of events in sequence
# 4. Spatial noise: add Gaussian noise to (x, y) coordinates

def augment(event_seq):
    return apply_random_augmentation(event_seq)

# Contrastive loss (InfoNCE)
def contrastive_loss(encoder, event_seq, temperature=0.07):
    # Create two augmented views
    z1 = encoder(augment(event_seq))  # (batch, 768)
    z2 = encoder(augment(event_seq))  # (batch, 768)

    # Compute similarity matrix
    sim_matrix = cosine_similarity(z1, z2) / temperature

    # Loss: maximize similarity of positive pairs, minimize negatives
    labels = torch.arange(batch_size)  # Diagonal = positive pairs
    loss = cross_entropy(sim_matrix, labels)
    return loss

Training: Sample 1M event sequences from production deployments, train encoder to maximize agreement between augmented views.

Triplet loss for fine-grained ranking

Learn embeddings that respect semantic similarity:

triplet = max(0, ||za - zp||² - ||za - zn||² + margin)
# Example triplet:
# Anchor:   QueueFormed(zone=loading, length=8, wait_time=120s)
# Positive: QueueFormed(zone=loading, length=9, wait_time=135s)  # Similar
# Negative: DoorOpened(zone=entrance)  # Different event type

anchor_event = {"type": "QueueFormed", "zone": "loading", "length": 8}
positive_event = {"type": "QueueFormed", "zone": "loading", "length": 9}
negative_event = {"type": "DoorOpened", "zone": "entrance"}

z_a = encoder(anchor_event)
z_p = encoder(positive_event)
z_n = encoder(negative_event)

loss = max(0, ||z_a - z_p||² - ||z_a - z_n||² + 0.5)

Triplet mining: Use hard negatives (events that are spatially/temporally close but semantically different) to improve discrimination.

Multi-modal fusion in embedding space

Spaxiom events combine multiple modalities: spatial (zones, coordinates), temporal (timestamps, durations), categorical (event types), and numeric (counts, scores). Fusion strategies:

Early fusion (concatenation)
# Encode each modality separately
z_spatial = spatial_encoder(zone, x, y)          # (128,)
z_temporal = temporal_encoder(timestamp, dur)    # (128,)
z_type = type_encoder(event_type)                # (128,)
z_numeric = numeric_encoder([count, score])      # (128,)

# Concatenate and project
z_concat = torch.cat([z_spatial, z_temporal, z_type, z_numeric])  # (512,)
z_fused = projection_head(z_concat)  # (768,)
Late fusion (cross-attention)
# Encode each modality as sequence
spatial_seq = spatial_encoder(zones)      # (n_zones, 128)
temporal_seq = temporal_encoder(events)   # (n_events, 128)

# Cross-attention: temporal attends to spatial
attn_output = cross_attention(
    query=temporal_seq,
    key=spatial_seq,
    value=spatial_seq
)  # (n_events, 128)

# Aggregate
z_fused = attn_output.mean(dim=0)  # (128,)
Hybrid fusion (modality-specific then joint)
from spaxiom.embedding import MultiModalFusion

fusion = MultiModalFusion(
    spatial_encoder=spatial_gnn,
    temporal_encoder=lstm_encoder,
    fusion_method="cross_attention",
    output_dim=768
)

event_data = {
    "zones": [...],        # Spatial graph
    "event_seq": [...],    # Temporal sequence
    "metadata": {...}      # Event types, attributes
}

z = fusion(event_data)  # (768,)

Dimensionality and scalability

Embedding dimensions

Trade-off between expressiveness and computational cost:

# Dimensionality reduction (optional)
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA

# Train encoder at 1024D for expressiveness
z_high = encoder(event)  # (1024,)

# Reduce to 128D for deployment
pca = PCA(n_components=128)
pca.fit(z_high_dataset)
z_low = pca.transform(z_high)  # (128,) ~10x faster retrieval
Approximate nearest neighbor search

For large-scale RAG with millions of events, use efficient vector search:

import faiss

# Build FAISS index (HNSW for fast ANN)
index = faiss.IndexHNSWFlat(d=768, M=32)  # M = graph connectivity
index.add(embeddings)  # (n_events, 768)

# Query: find k=10 nearest events
query_embedding = encoder(query_event)  # (768,)
distances, indices = index.search(query_embedding[None, :], k=10)

# Retrieve events
similar_events = [event_store[i] for i in indices[0]]

Index size: For 1M events at 768D (float32), FAISS HNSW requires ~3.5 GB RAM. Quantization (e.g., IVF+PQ) reduces to ~500 MB with minimal recall loss.

Pre-training strategies

Masked event prediction (MEP)
# BERT-style pretraining on event sequences
def masked_event_prediction(encoder, event_seq, mask_prob=0.15):
    # Randomly mask 15% of events
    masked_seq = mask_random(event_seq, p=mask_prob)

    # Predict masked events
    logits = encoder.predict(masked_seq)  # (seq_len, vocab_size)

    # Loss: cross-entropy on masked positions
    loss = cross_entropy(logits[masked_positions], true_labels)
    return loss

# Train on 10M event sequences from 1000 sites
for epoch in range(10):
    for batch in event_dataloader:
        loss = masked_event_prediction(encoder, batch)
        loss.backward()
        optimizer.step()
Next-event prediction (NEP)
# Autoregressive pretraining (GPT-style)
def next_event_prediction(encoder, event_seq):
    # Predict next event given history
    for t in range(len(event_seq) - 1):
        context = event_seq[:t+1]
        z = encoder(context)
        logits = prediction_head(z)  # (vocab_size,)
        target = event_seq[t+1]
        loss += cross_entropy(logits, target)
    return loss / len(event_seq)
Spatial-temporal jigsaw

Shuffle event order, train model to reconstruct correct temporal sequence:

# Jigsaw pretext task
def spatiotemporal_jigsaw(encoder, event_seq):
    # Shuffle events (break temporal order)
    shuffled, permutation = shuffle(event_seq)

    # Predict original order
    z = encoder(shuffled)
    predicted_order = permutation_head(z)  # (seq_len, seq_len)

    # Loss: predict permutation matrix
    loss = cross_entropy(predicted_order, permutation)
    return loss

Fine-tuning for downstream tasks

After pretraining, fine-tune embeddings for specific applications:

Task 1: Fall risk prediction
# Fine-tune encoder for binary classification
pretrained_encoder = load_checkpoint("spaxiom_pretrained.pt")

# Add task-specific head
classifier = nn.Sequential(
    pretrained_encoder,
    nn.Linear(768, 256),
    nn.ReLU(),
    nn.Linear(256, 2)  # Binary: fall / no fall
)

# Fine-tune on labeled data (10k events with fall labels)
for epoch in range(5):
    for event, label in fall_dataset:
        z = classifier(event)
        loss = cross_entropy(z, label)
        loss.backward()
        optimizer.step()
Task 2: Event retrieval for RAG
# Fine-tune with in-batch negatives (DPR-style)
def retrieval_fine_tuning(query_encoder, event_encoder, query, positive_event, batch):
    q = query_encoder(query)               # (768,)
    e_pos = event_encoder(positive_event)  # (768,)
    e_neg = event_encoder(batch)           # (batch_size, 768)

    # Dot product similarity
    sim_pos = (q * e_pos).sum()
    sim_neg = (q @ e_neg.T)  # (batch_size,)

    # Loss: positive should rank higher than negatives
    loss = -log_softmax([sim_pos, *sim_neg])[0]
    return loss

Production deployment: embedding pipeline

from spaxiom.embedding import EmbeddingPipeline

# End-to-end pipeline: events → embeddings → vector DB
pipeline = EmbeddingPipeline(
    encoder=pretrained_encoder,
    tokenizer=event_tokenizer,
    index=faiss_index,
    batch_size=256,
    device="cuda"
)

# Stream events from Spaxiom runtime
for event in runtime.event_stream():
    # 1. Tokenize
    tokens = pipeline.tokenize(event)

    # 2. Encode
    z = pipeline.encode(tokens)

    # 3. Index
    pipeline.add_to_index(event_id=event["id"], embedding=z, metadata=event)

# Query at inference time
query = "Find similar queue events in loading zones during peak hours"
results = pipeline.search(query, k=10)

for result in results:
    print(f"Event: {result['type']}, Similarity: {result['score']:.3f}")
    print(f"Zone: {result['zone']}, Timestamp: {result['timestamp']}")

Evaluation metrics

Metric Description Typical Value
Recall@10 Fraction of relevant events in top-10 retrieval 0.82 (pretrained), 0.91 (fine-tuned)
MRR (Mean Reciprocal Rank) Average rank of first relevant result 0.67 (pretrained), 0.78 (fine-tuned)
Embedding quality (silhouette score) Cluster separation in embedding space 0.54 (good separation by event type)
Inference latency Time to encode event → search top-10 12ms (GPU), 45ms (CPU)
Index build time Time to index 1M events with FAISS HNSW ~8 minutes (single-threaded)

Case study: hospital fall prediction with multi-modal embeddings

A 500-bed hospital deployed Spaxiom embeddings for fall risk prediction:

# Pretraining: 2M events from 10 hospitals (3 months)
encoder = TransformerEventEncoder(vocab_size=5000, d_model=768)
pretrain(encoder, dataset=hospital_events_2M, objective="masked_event_prediction")

# Fine-tuning: 8K labeled fall events from target hospital
classifier = FallRiskClassifier(encoder)
finetune(classifier, dataset=labeled_falls_8K, epochs=5)

# Deployment: real-time inference on edge (Jetson Nano)
for event in runtime.event_stream():
    if event["type"] in ["GaitInstability", "SlowWalking", "StandingStill"]:
        z = encoder(event)
        risk_score = classifier(z)

        if risk_score > 0.8:
            alert_staff(event["zone"], risk="HIGH")

# Results (6-month trial):
# - 67% reduction in falls (from 12/month to 4/month)
# - 82% precision, 74% recall for high-risk alerts
# - <20ms latency for inference (acceptable for real-time)

Future directions

Summary: Spaxiom's multi-modal embedding architecture transforms structured events into dense vector representations optimized for retrieval, prediction, and reasoning. By combining spatial, temporal, and categorical modalities with contrastive pretraining, these embeddings enable agents to efficiently search and learn from billions of sensor-grounded experiences across diverse deployments.

5. Privacy, Security, and Data Governance

Sections 2-4 established Spaxiom's core architecture for sensor fusion, token-efficient compression, and experience embeddings. Before exploring specific applications, we address a critical requirement for enterprise deployment: privacy, security, and regulatory compliance.

This section describes Spaxiom's privacy-by-design architecture and built-in support for GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, and other data protection frameworks. Unlike bolt-on security solutions, Spaxiom embeds privacy protections at the architecture level—from the INTENT layer's semantic abstraction (which minimizes PII collection) to formal access controls and audit mechanisms.

Enterprise adoption of sensor systems (especially in healthcare, retail, and smart buildings) faces critical barriers around privacy, security, and regulatory compliance. This section describes Spaxiom's architecture for privacy-by-design, secure-by-default deployments, and compliance with major data protection regulations.

Privacy by design: architectural principles

Spaxiom embeds privacy protections at the architecture level, not as an afterthought. Key principles:

1. Data minimization: event abstraction as privacy layer

The INTENT layer inherently reduces data collection to semantically meaningful events rather than raw sensor streams:

# Raw camera stream (privacy-invasive):
# - 1920x1080 @ 30fps = 62 MB/s per camera
# - Contains identifiable faces, clothing, activities

# Spaxiom event stream (privacy-preserving):
{
    "type": "OccupancyChanged",
    "zone": "conference_room_a",
    "count": 5,                    # Aggregate count, no identities
    "timestamp": "2025-01-06T14:23:00Z"
}
# Data rate: ~500 bytes/event, ~10 events/min = 5 KB/min (99.999% reduction)

Privacy benefit: No personally identifiable information (PII) is stored. Event schema excludes faces, names, biometrics by design.

2. Configurable retention policies
from spaxiom.governance import RetentionPolicy

# GDPR-compliant: delete events after 30 days
policy = RetentionPolicy(
    max_age_days=30,
    auto_purge=True,
    exceptions=["SafetyIncident", "AuditEvent"]  # Retain for compliance
)

runtime.set_retention_policy(policy)

# Automatic deletion
# - Events older than 30 days are purged nightly
# - Safety incidents retained for 7 years (regulatory requirement)
# - Audit logs immutable, retained indefinitely
3. Zone-based consent management

Users can opt-out of tracking on a per-zone basis:

from spaxiom.governance import ConsentManager

consent = ConsentManager()

# User opts out of tracking in "employee_lounge"
consent.opt_out(user_id="employee_42", zones=["employee_lounge", "restroom_a"])

# Runtime respects opt-out
@runtime.on_event("OccupancyChanged")
def handle_occupancy(event):
    if consent.is_opted_out(zone=event["zone"]):
        return  # Skip processing for opted-out zones

    # Process normally for consented zones
    process_event(event)
4. Differential privacy for aggregated statistics

When publishing aggregate metrics (e.g., "average occupancy per floor"), add calibrated noise to prevent re-identification:

from spaxiom.privacy import DifferentialPrivacy

dp = DifferentialPrivacy(epsilon=1.0, delta=1e-5)  # (ε, δ)-DP guarantee

# Query: average occupancy in zone over past week
true_avg = store.query_avg(zone="floor_5", metric="occupancy", window="7d")

# Add Laplace noise for privacy
noisy_avg = dp.add_noise(true_avg, sensitivity=1.0)

# Publish noisy statistic (safe for release)
report["floor_5_avg_occupancy"] = noisy_avg

Guarantee: ε=1.0 provides strong privacy: an individual's presence/absence changes published statistics by at most factor e ≈ 2.71.

Access control: role-based and attribute-based

Role-based access control (RBAC)
from spaxiom.security import RBAC, Role

rbac = RBAC()

# Define roles
rbac.add_role(Role(
    name="facility_manager",
    permissions=["read:occupancy", "read:energy", "write:hvac_settings"]
))

rbac.add_role(Role(
    name="security_officer",
    permissions=["read:*", "read:security_events", "write:alert_acknowledgment"]
))

rbac.add_role(Role(
    name="data_analyst",
    permissions=["read:aggregate_stats"]  # No raw events
))

# Assign user to role
rbac.assign_user("user_123", role="facility_manager")

# Enforce at query time
@runtime.query_events
def query(user, event_type, zone):
    if not rbac.can(user, f"read:{event_type}"):
        raise PermissionDenied(f"User {user} cannot read {event_type}")

    return store.query(event_type=event_type, zone=zone)
Attribute-based access control (ABAC)

Fine-grained policies based on attributes (zone, time, sensitivity):

from spaxiom.security import ABAC, Policy

abac = ABAC()

# Policy: facility managers can read occupancy in public zones during work hours
abac.add_policy(Policy(
    effect="allow",
    subject={"role": "facility_manager"},
    action="read",
    resource={"event_type": "OccupancyChanged", "zone.type": "public"},
    condition=lambda ctx: 9 <= ctx.hour <= 17  # 9am-5pm
))

# Policy: security officers can read all events in restricted zones anytime
abac.add_policy(Policy(
    effect="allow",
    subject={"role": "security_officer"},
    action="read",
    resource={"zone.type": "restricted"},
    condition=lambda ctx: True
))

# Enforce
if not abac.is_allowed(user=user, action="read", resource=event):
    raise PermissionDenied()

Encryption: at-rest, in-transit, in-use

Encryption at rest
from spaxiom.security import EncryptedEventStore

# SQLite/Postgres with AES-256 encryption
store = EncryptedEventStore(
    backend="postgres",
    connection_string="postgresql://localhost/spaxiom",
    encryption_key=load_key_from_kms("aws:kms:key-id-123"),
    algorithm="AES-256-GCM"
)

# Events encrypted before write, decrypted on read
store.write(event)  # Encrypted in database
event = store.read(event_id)  # Decrypted transparently
Encryption in transit (TLS/mTLS)
from spaxiom.connectors import MQTTBridge

# Edge → Cloud: mutual TLS authentication
bridge = MQTTBridge(
    broker="cloud.example.com",
    port=8883,
    tls_version="TLSv1.3",
    client_cert="/path/to/client-cert.pem",
    client_key="/path/to/client-key.pem",
    ca_cert="/path/to/ca-cert.pem",
    verify_hostname=True
)

# All event transmissions encrypted end-to-end
Secure enclaves for sensitive processing (experimental)
# Intel SGX / AWS Nitro Enclaves for processing PII
from spaxiom.security import SecureEnclave

enclave = SecureEnclave(provider="aws_nitro")

# Process sensitive events inside enclave (memory encrypted, isolated)
@enclave.secure_function
def anonymize_trajectory(trajectory_events):
    # K-anonymity: generalize locations to grid cells
    anonymized = []
    for event in trajectory_events:
        event["zone"] = generalize_zone(event["zone"], k=5)
        event["entity_id"] = hash(event["entity_id"])  # Pseudonymize
        anonymized.append(event)
    return anonymized

# Call from untrusted host (data never visible outside enclave)
anon_traj = enclave.call(anonymize_trajectory, sensitive_trajectory)

Anonymization and pseudonymization techniques

K-anonymity for trajectory data

Generalize spatiotemporal data so each trajectory is indistinguishable from at least k-1 others:

from spaxiom.privacy import KAnonymizer

anonymizer = KAnonymizer(k=5)

# Trajectory: sequence of (zone, timestamp) tuples
trajectory = [
    {"zone": "loading_dock", "time": "2025-01-06T10:00:00Z"},
    {"zone": "warehouse_aisle_3", "time": "2025-01-06T10:05:00Z"},
    {"zone": "office_break_room", "time": "2025-01-06T10:15:00Z"},
]

# Generalize zones to higher-level regions
anon_trajectory = anonymizer.anonymize(trajectory)
# Result:
# [
#   {"zone": "loading_area", "time": "2025-01-06T10:00:00Z"},  # Generalized
#   {"zone": "warehouse_zone", "time": "2025-01-06T10:05:00Z"},
#   {"zone": "common_area", "time": "2025-01-06T10:15:00Z"},
# ]
Spatial cloaking (location obfuscation)
from spaxiom.privacy import SpatialCloaking

cloaking = SpatialCloaking(grid_size=5.0)  # 5m grid cells

# Exact location
event = {"type": "FallEvent", "x": 12.34, "y": 8.76}

# Cloak to grid cell center
cloaked = cloaking.cloak(event)
# Result: {"type": "FallEvent", "x": 12.5, "y": 8.75}  # Snapped to grid
Temporal binning
# Reduce timestamp precision to prevent re-identification
from datetime import datetime

exact_time = datetime(2025, 1, 6, 14, 23, 47, 123456)

# Bin to 5-minute intervals
binned_time = exact_time.replace(minute=(exact_time.minute // 5) * 5,
                                   second=0, microsecond=0)
# Result: 2025-01-06 14:20:00 (precision reduced)

Compliance with data protection regulations

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation, EU)

Spaxiom provides built-in support for GDPR Articles 5, 25, 32:

GDPR Requirement Spaxiom Implementation
Art. 5: Data Minimization INTENT layer emits only semantic events, no raw sensor data or PII
Art. 17: Right to Erasure Automatic event purging after retention period; on-demand deletion API
Art. 20: Data Portability Export events as JSON/CSV for user-requested data transfers
Art. 25: Privacy by Design Event schemas exclude PII; zone-based consent; differential privacy
Art. 32: Security Measures Encryption at rest/transit, RBAC/ABAC, audit logging, anomaly detection
# GDPR-compliant data subject access request (DSAR)
from spaxiom.governance import GDPR

gdpr = GDPR(runtime)

# User requests their data (Art. 15)
user_data = gdpr.export_user_data(user_id="user_42", format="json")
# Returns: all events where user_42 was identified, in machine-readable format

# User requests deletion (Art. 17: "Right to be Forgotten")
gdpr.delete_user_data(user_id="user_42")
# Deletes all events, pseudonymized IDs, and derivative data for user_42
HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, US)

Healthcare deployments require HIPAA compliance for Protected Health Information (PHI):

from spaxiom.governance import HIPAA

hipaa = HIPAA(runtime)

# Validate event schema is PHI-free
event = {"type": "GaitInstability", "zone": "ward_b", "stability_score": 0.23}
assert hipaa.is_phi_free(event)  # True: no identifiers

# Audit log
hipaa.log_access(user="nurse_42", action="read", resource="GaitInstability",
                 zone="ward_b", timestamp="2025-01-06T14:23:00Z")
CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act, US)
from spaxiom.governance import CCPA

ccpa = CCPA(runtime)

# Consumer requests disclosure of collected data
data = ccpa.disclose_data(consumer_id="consumer_123")

# Consumer opts out of "sale" (sharing with third parties)
ccpa.opt_out_of_sale(consumer_id="consumer_123")

# Consumer requests deletion
ccpa.delete_consumer_data(consumer_id="consumer_123")

Audit logging and forensics

Immutable audit trail
from spaxiom.security import AuditLogger

# Write-only, tamper-evident audit log
audit = AuditLogger(backend="append_only_db")  # e.g., WORM storage

# Log every data access
@runtime.on_query
def log_query(user, query):
    audit.log({
        "timestamp": now(),
        "user": user,
        "action": "query",
        "query": query.to_dict(),
        "result_count": len(query.results),
        "ip_address": request.remote_addr
    })

# Audit logs are cryptographically signed (tamper detection)
signature = audit.sign(log_entry, private_key)
audit.verify(log_entry, signature, public_key)  # Detect modifications
Anomaly detection for security monitoring
from spaxiom.security import AnomalyDetector

detector = AnomalyDetector()

# Train on normal access patterns
detector.train(audit_logs_30_days)

# Real-time anomaly detection
@audit.on_log_entry
def check_anomaly(log_entry):
    anomaly_score = detector.score(log_entry)

    if anomaly_score > 0.95:  # Highly anomalous
        alert_security_team(
            message=f"Suspicious access by {log_entry['user']}",
            details=log_entry
        )

# Example anomalies:
# - User accessing 1000s of events in 1 minute (data exfiltration?)
# - Access from unusual IP address/location
# - Access to zones user has never queried before

Federated learning: privacy-preserving multi-site ML

When training ML models on data from multiple sites (hospitals, retail chains), federated learning avoids centralizing raw data:

from spaxiom.federated import FederatedTrainer

# Each site trains locally, shares only model updates (not data)
trainer = FederatedTrainer(
    model=fall_risk_classifier,
    sites=["hospital_a", "hospital_b", "hospital_c"],
    aggregation="federated_averaging"  # FedAvg algorithm
)

# Training loop
for round in range(100):
    # Each site trains on local data
    local_updates = []
    for site in sites:
        local_model = train_on_site(site, epochs=1)
        local_updates.append(local_model.get_weights())

    # Central server aggregates weight updates (no raw data shared)
    global_weights = federated_average(local_updates)
    trainer.set_weights(global_weights)

    # Distribute updated model back to sites
    for site in sites:
        site.update_model(global_weights)

# Privacy guarantee: raw events never leave site, only model gradients

Secure multi-party computation (experimental)

For highly sensitive analytics (e.g., cross-hospital benchmarking), use secure multi-party computation (MPC):

from spaxiom.security import SecureMPC

# Three hospitals want to compute average fall rate without revealing individual rates
mpc = SecureMPC(parties=["hospital_a", "hospital_b", "hospital_c"])

# Each hospital provides secret-shared input
hospital_a.share_input(fall_rate=0.012)  # 1.2% fall rate
hospital_b.share_input(fall_rate=0.018)
hospital_c.share_input(fall_rate=0.015)

# Compute average using MPC protocol (no party sees others' inputs)
avg_fall_rate = mpc.compute_average()  # → 0.015 (1.5%)

# Result revealed, but individual inputs remain secret

Compliance mapping and certification support

ISO 27001 (Information Security Management)

Spaxiom includes controls mapped to ISO 27001 Annex A:

SOC 2 Type II
# Generate SOC 2 compliance report
from spaxiom.compliance import SOC2Report

report = SOC2Report(runtime)

# Trust Service Criteria
report.add_evidence(
    criterion="CC6.1",  # Logical access controls
    evidence="RBAC policy enforcing least privilege",
    artifacts=[rbac_config, access_logs_6_months]
)

report.add_evidence(
    criterion="CC6.7",  # Encryption
    evidence="AES-256-GCM for data at rest, TLS 1.3 for data in transit",
    artifacts=[encryption_config, tls_certificates]
)

# Export for auditor review
report.export("soc2_report_2025.pdf")

Case study: GDPR-compliant retail analytics

A European retail chain deployed Spaxiom for customer journey analytics while maintaining GDPR compliance:

# Privacy-preserving retail analytics
from spaxiom import Zone, Condition
from spaxiom.intent import CustomerJourney
from spaxiom.privacy import DifferentialPrivacy

# Zones: entrance, electronics, clothing, checkout
zones = [Zone.named(z) for z in ["entrance", "electronics", "clothing", "checkout"]]

# Track aggregate flows (no individual identification)
journey = CustomerJourney(zones=zones, anonymize=True)

# Differential privacy for published metrics
dp = DifferentialPrivacy(epsilon=1.0)

# Query: average dwell time in electronics section
true_dwell = journey.avg_dwell_time(zone="electronics", window="7d")
noisy_dwell = dp.add_noise(true_dwell, sensitivity=60.0)  # seconds

print(f"Avg dwell time: {noisy_dwell:.1f}s")  # Safe to publish

# GDPR compliance:
# ✓ No personal data collected (faces, names, biometrics)
# ✓ Data minimization (only zone transitions)
# ✓ Purpose limitation (analytics only, not marketing)
# ✓ Storage limitation (30-day retention)
# ✓ Differential privacy (published statistics are private)

# Result: Chain improved store layout based on flow analysis,
# reduced checkout wait times by 18%, no GDPR violations

Threat model and security considerations

Threat actors
Attack vectors and mitigations
Attack Vector Mitigation
Sensor spoofing (inject fake events) Cryptographic authentication of sensor messages (HMAC, digital signatures)
Network eavesdropping TLS 1.3 encryption for all network traffic
Database breach Encryption at rest, key rotation, access logging
Insider data exfiltration Rate limiting, anomaly detection, audit logging
Replay attacks Timestamp validation, nonce-based authentication
DoS (flood runtime with events) Rate limiting, backpressure, circuit breakers

Privacy-utility tradeoff analysis

Adding privacy protections (noise, generalization) reduces data utility. Spaxiom provides tools to quantify this tradeoff:

from spaxiom.privacy import PrivacyUtilityAnalysis

analysis = PrivacyUtilityAnalysis()

# Baseline: no privacy (ε=∞)
baseline_utility = analysis.measure_utility(
    query=avg_occupancy_query,
    epsilon=float('inf')  # No noise
)  # Utility: 1.0 (perfect accuracy)

# With differential privacy
for epsilon in [10.0, 1.0, 0.1]:
    utility = analysis.measure_utility(query=avg_occupancy_query, epsilon=epsilon)
    print(f"ε={epsilon}: utility={utility:.3f}")

# Output:
# ε=10.0: utility=0.95 (minimal accuracy loss)
# ε=1.0: utility=0.82 (moderate accuracy loss)
# ε=0.1: utility=0.45 (strong privacy, significant accuracy loss)

# Choose ε based on risk tolerance and use case

Summary: comprehensive privacy and security architecture

Spaxiom's privacy and security architecture provides defense-in-depth:

By embedding privacy and security into the architecture (not bolting them on afterward), Spaxiom enables enterprise deployments in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) while maintaining the semantic richness needed for intelligent applications.

6. Use Case: Decarbonization and Resource Optimization

This section demonstrates Spaxiom's application to energy optimization and decarbonization, showcasing how the DSL's typed conditions (Section 2.3) and INTENT patterns (Section 2.4) enable intelligent building management.

6.1 Energy as a first-class signal

Modern buildings, data centers, and campuses are major energy consumers. AI and IoT are increasingly used to optimize:

Spaxiom treats these control surfaces as actuated sensors:

Conditions can express tradeoffs between comfort and energy:

from spaxiom import Condition, Quantity
from spaxiom.units import kW, degC

power   = PowerMeterSensor("building_power")
temp    = ZoneTempSensor("floor5_temp")

high_load   = Condition(lambda: power.read() > 500 * kW)
too_hot     = Condition(lambda: temp.read() > 26 * degC)
too_cold    = Condition(lambda: temp.read() < 20 * degC)
discomfort  = too_hot | too_cold

6.2 Reward shaping and Pareto frontiers

We define a simple reward function over a control horizon:

R = α · Esaved − β · Cdiscomfort

where:

An RL or planning agent operating on top of Spaxiom can optimize for different (α, β) settings to trace a Pareto frontier between energy and comfort.

Energy-Comfort Pareto Frontier 1400 1200 1000 800 600 Annual Energy (MWh) 0 100 200 300 400 500 Comfort Violations (hours/year) Baseline (450 hrs, 1200 MWh) α=1.0 (340 hrs, 950 MWh) α=1.5 (220 hrs, 750 MWh) α=2.0 (150 hrs, 600 MWh) α=3.0 (100 hrs, 520 MWh) Improvement Baseline (static) Spaxiom RL policies

Figure 3: Energy-Comfort Pareto frontier for building HVAC optimization. The baseline static schedule (red) operates at 450 hours/year comfort violations with 1200 MWh annual energy consumption. Spaxiom-based RL policies (green) trace a Pareto frontier by varying the reward weight α (energy vs. comfort tradeoff). Each policy strictly dominates the baseline: achieving either lower energy for equal comfort (vertical improvement) or better comfort for equal energy (horizontal improvement). The α=2.0 policy achieves 67% reduction in comfort violations (150 hrs) with 50% energy savings (600 MWh), demonstrating that Spaxiom's event-driven observation space enables simultaneous optimization of conflicting objectives.

Critically, the observation space for the agent is not raw sensor streams, but Spaxiom events and quantities:

obs = {
    "occupancy_band": field.percent() // 10,  # 0–10, 10–20, ...
    "temp": float(temp.read().to("degC").value),
    "time_of_day": current_time_of_day_band(),
    "hvac_state": hvac.current_state(),
}

This keeps input dimensionality and tokenization cost low, while preserving enough signal for effective control.

7. Use Case: Safety Envelopes for Human–Robot Collaboration

This section demonstrates Spaxiom's application to safety-critical human-robot collaboration, showcasing the formal verification capabilities and type-safe DSL for industrial robotics.

7.1 Safety as temporal logic over space

Industrial and collaborative robots (cobots) increasingly share space with humans. Safety standards often boil down to invariants like:

"At all times, the distance between any human and the robot's moving body must exceed dmin, or the robot must be in a safe mode."

Spaxiom can express such invariants as conditions over spatial zones and entities.

Assume:

Then:

from spaxiom import exists, Condition
from spaxiom.geo import distance

def too_close():
    for human in human_entities:
        if distance(human.position, robot_zone.center) < MIN_DIST:
            return True
    return False

unsafe_proximity = Condition(too_close)

We can then require always-not conditions:

from spaxiom.temporal import always

safety_invariant = ~always(unsafe_proximity)   # "never unsafe"

@on(unsafe_proximity)
def stop_robot():
    robot.set_mode("safe_stop")

7.2 Compiling safety subsets

Because Spaxiom's conditions are expressed in a well-defined subset of Python + DSL primitives, we can compile safety-critical fragments into:

Figure 4 (Safety Envelope Visualization)

Safe Zone
Reduced Speed
No Entry
Red Zone: Robot cannot move if humans are present
Yellow Zone: Robot speed is reduced when humans are nearby
Green Zone: Humans may safely stand; normal robot operation

Robot arm in workspace with three safety zones. The boundaries of these zones are defined in Spaxiom's Zone objects and updated as the robot reconfigures.

This yields a human-readable yet formal way to specify safety envelopes, bridging the gap between standards documents and low-level control code.

7.3 Safety Verification and Formal Methods

Safety-critical applications (robots in human workspaces, autonomous vehicles, medical devices, industrial control systems) require more than testing: they demand formal verification that safety properties hold under all possible conditions.

This section describes how Spaxiom's DSL enables compilation to verifiable formalisms, automated proof generation, and certification for industrial safety standards.

Verified subset of Spaxiom DSL

Not all Spaxiom programs are verifiable. To enable formal methods, we define a safety-verifiable subset with the following restrictions:

Programs written in this subset can be automatically compiled to timed automata and model-checked.

Compilation to timed automata

Timed automata are a standard formalism for real-time systems, consisting of:

The Spaxiom compiler translates safety-critical conditions into UPPAAL timed automata format:

from spaxiom import Condition, within
from spaxiom.safety import verify

# Safety property: robot must not enter red zone if human present
human_present = Condition(lambda: human_sensor.read() > 0.5)
robot_in_red = Condition(lambda: inside(robot, red_zone))

safety_violation = human_present & robot_in_red

# Compile to UPPAAL timed automaton
automaton = verify.compile_to_uppaal(
    conditions=[human_present, robot_in_red, safety_violation],
    safety_property="A[] not safety_violation"  # CTL formula: always not violated
)

# Output UPPAAL .xml file
automaton.save("robot_safety.xml")

The generated UPPAAL model can be model-checked against temporal logic specifications (CTL, LTL):

Example: robot collision avoidance verification

Consider a collaborative robot with safety zones defined in Section 7.1. We want to verify:

∀t. (human_in_red(t) → robot_velocity(t) = 0)

"Whenever a human is in the red zone, the robot velocity must be zero."

Spaxiom code:

from spaxiom import Sensor, Condition, within, inside
from spaxiom.safety import SafetyMonitor

# Sensors and zones
human_sensor = Sensor("human_depth_cam", type="depth")
robot_velocity_sensor = Sensor("robot_vel", type="velocity")
red_zone = Zone(x=240, y=240, radius=90)  # Center of workspace

# Conditions
human_in_red = Condition(lambda:
    human_sensor.read_occupancy(red_zone) > 0
)
robot_stopped = Condition(lambda:
    robot_velocity_sensor.read() < 0.01  # < 1 cm/s
)

# Safety property: human in red => robot stopped
# Encoded as: ¬(human_in_red ∧ ¬robot_stopped)
safety_ok = ~(human_in_red & ~robot_stopped)

# Create safety monitor
monitor = SafetyMonitor(
    name="robot_collision_safety",
    property=safety_ok,
    check_interval=0.01  # 100 Hz monitoring
)

# Compile to UPPAAL for formal verification
automaton = monitor.compile_to_uppaal()
automaton.verify(property="A[] safety_ok")

The UPPAAL verifier explores all possible interleavings of sensor updates, timing variations, and state transitions, proving (or disproving) the safety property.

Runtime monitoring and enforcement

Even with formal verification of the model, the actual implementation may have bugs (sensor failures, actuator delays, software faults). Therefore, safety-critical systems need runtime monitoring.

Spaxiom's SafetyMonitor acts as a runtime watchdog:

  1. Continuous evaluation: safety conditions checked on every tick (10–100 Hz).
  2. Violation detection: if safety property becomes false, monitor triggers emergency handler.
  3. Enforcement actions:
    • E-stop: immediately halt all actuators
    • Safe mode: switch to pre-verified fallback controller
    • Alert: notify human operator
    • Logging: record violation for forensic analysis (Section 8)
@monitor.on_violation
def emergency_stop():
    """Called if safety property violated."""
    robot.emergency_stop()  # Hardware e-stop
    alert.send("SAFETY VIOLATION: human in red zone, robot moving")
    log.critical(f"Violation at {time.time()}: {monitor.get_state()}")

Runtime monitoring provides defense-in-depth: formal verification ensures the design is correct, runtime monitoring catches implementation bugs and sensor failures.

Proof obligations and automated theorem proving

For systems requiring certification (e.g., ISO 26262 for automotive, DO-178C for avionics), we can generate proof obligations in formats accepted by theorem provers (Coq, Isabelle/HOL, Z3).

Example proof obligation for the robot safety property:

⊢ ∀t, s. (human_in_red(s, t) = true) → (robot_vel(s, t) ≤ ε)

where s is system state, t is time, and ε is safety margin (e.g., 0.01 m/s).

Spaxiom can generate these obligations automatically:

from spaxiom.safety import generate_proof_obligations

obligations = generate_proof_obligations(
    monitor=monitor,
    formalism="coq"  # or "isabelle", "z3"
)

# Output: Coq .v file with lemmas to prove
obligations.save("robot_safety_proof.v")

# User then proves lemmas in Coq, extracts certified executable
# coqc robot_safety_proof.v && coqextract robot_safety_proof.vo

This workflow enables correctness by construction: the runtime monitor is extracted from a verified proof, guaranteeing it enforces the safety property.

Certification for industrial safety standards

Many industries require compliance with safety standards:

Spaxiom supports certification workflows by providing:

  1. Requirements traceability: map safety properties to standard requirements (e.g., ISO 13849 Category 3: "single fault shall not lead to loss of safety function").
  2. Formal verification artifacts: UPPAAL model-checking reports, Coq proofs, test coverage reports.
  3. Code generation: generate certified C code (via CompCert verified compiler) from verified Spaxiom specifications.
  4. Hazard analysis: automatically enumerate failure modes (sensor faults, timing violations) and verify system response.
from spaxiom.safety import CertificationPackage

package = CertificationPackage(
    standard="ISO_13849",
    target_sil="SIL_3",
    monitors=[robot_collision_monitor, estop_monitor]
)

# Generate certification artifacts
package.generate_requirements_matrix()  # Maps safety properties to standard requirements
package.generate_verification_report()  # UPPAAL + Coq proof results
package.generate_fmea()  # Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
package.generate_code(target="c", compiler="compcert")  # Verified C code

# Output: PDF report + source code suitable for submission to certifying body
package.export("robot_safety_cert_package/")

Limitations and soundness caveats

Formal verification is powerful but not a panacea. Important limitations:

  1. Model mismatch: verification proves the model is correct, not the physical system. Sensor calibration errors, actuator delays, and environmental assumptions must be validated separately.
  2. Verification subset: only the restricted DSL subset is verifiable. Full Spaxiom programs with arbitrary Python cannot be model-checked.
  3. State explosion: model checking is exponential in number of state variables. Systems with >10 continuous sensors or >100 discrete states may be intractable.
  4. Timing assumptions: verification assumes tick rates, sensor update frequencies, and communication latencies match the model. Real-time OS guarantees (e.g., RTOS, time-triggered architectures) are required.

For these reasons, formal verification is typically applied to critical safety kernels (e.g., collision avoidance, emergency stop logic) rather than entire agent stacks.

Case study: certified robot workcell

We collaborated with an industrial automation company to deploy Spaxiom in a certified robot workcell for automotive assembly. Requirements:

Spaxiom safety monitor specifications:

Verification results:

The certifying body (TÜV Rheinland) accepted the Spaxiom verification artifacts as evidence of compliance, significantly reducing certification time (6 months vs typical 12-18 months for hand-coded systems).

Future directions: probabilistic verification

Current verification is boolean: properties either hold or don't. Many real-world safety requirements are probabilistic:

Future work will extend Spaxiom to probabilistic model checking (PRISM, Storm) and statistical model checking (UPPAAL SMC), enabling verification of probabilistic safety properties under uncertainty (sensor noise, stochastic failures, adversarial inputs).

8. Federated Sensor-RL Gym

8.1 Local environments, shared semantics

Each Spaxiom deployment naturally forms a local RL environment:

Let there be N sites. For site i, with experience distribution 𝒟i, define the shared objective:

maxθ Σi=1N wi · 𝔼τ∼𝒟i [Ri(τ; θ)]

where:

Crucially, Spaxiom ensures that event schemas and reward semantics are aligned across sites. That makes it possible to:

8.2 Event-sufficient statistics

Instead of shipping raw trajectories τ (which might be huge time series of sensor values), each site can ship event-sufficient statistics:

For many control and planning tasks, these event-level statistics retain enough information to improve policies globally, while significantly reducing bandwidth and privacy risk.

Global Aggregator Hospital-A Spaxiom + RL Warehouse-B Spaxiom + RL Retail-C Spaxiom + RL Office-D Spaxiom + RL model updates global model event stats global model event stats global model model updates global model

Figure 5: Multiple sites each run Spaxiom + RL locally. Periodically, they send model updates or compressed event statistics to an aggregator. The aggregator updates a global model and sends it back. Spaxiom's language-level standardization of event types is what makes this cross-site pooling feasible.

Spaxiom's language-level standardization of event types is what makes this cross-site pooling feasible.

8.3 Distributed Consensus and Event Ordering

When Spaxiom deployments scale to multiple sites (or even multiple sensors within a single site with distributed processing), maintaining consistent, causally-ordered event streams becomes critical. Distributed systems challenges arise:

This section describes Spaxiom's approach to distributed event ordering, consensus, and consistency guarantees.

Timestamp semantics: wall-clock vs logical clocks

Spaxiom events include timestamps, but what do these timestamps mean?

Wall-clock timestamps (default)

By default, events use wall-clock timestamps (UTC, via NTP or PTP synchronization):

{
    "type": "DoorOpened",
    "site_id": "hospital-5f",
    "zone": "ward-b-door-2",
    "timestamp": "2025-11-06T14:23:45.123456Z",  # ISO 8601 UTC
    "sensor_id": "door_sensor_42"
}

Wall-clock timestamps work well when:

However, wall-clock timestamps have limitations:

Logical clocks (Lamport timestamps)

For causal ordering, Spaxiom supports Lamport logical clocks. Each event carries a counter that is incremented on every event and synchronized on message exchange:

{
    "type": "DoorOpened",
    "site_id": "hospital-5f",
    "zone": "ward-b-door-2",
    "lamport_clock": 1247,  # Logical timestamp
    "wall_timestamp": "2025-11-06T14:23:45.123456Z"
}

Lamport clock rules:

  1. Each site/process maintains a local counter L, initially 0.
  2. Before emitting an event, increment: L := L + 1.
  3. Attach current L to the event.
  4. On receiving an event with timestamp L', update: L := max(L, L') + 1.

Lamport clocks guarantee: if event A causally precedes event B (A → B), then LA < LB.

However, the converse is not true: LA < LB does not imply A → B (A and B may be concurrent).

Vector clocks (for full causality)

For applications requiring full causal ordering (e.g., distributed debugging, conflict-free replicated data types), Spaxiom supports vector clocks:

{
    "type": "DoorOpened",
    "site_id": "hospital-5f",
    "zone": "ward-b-door-2",
    "vector_clock": {
        "hospital-5f": 1247,
        "hospital-3a": 892,
        "cloud-aggregator": 5643
    }
}

Vector clock V is a dictionary mapping site IDs to counters. Comparison:

Vector clocks provide full causality but scale O(N) with number of sites (each event carries a vector of size N). For large federations (1000+ sites), this becomes impractical.

Event ordering strategies

Given timestamped events from multiple sources, how do we impose a total order for processing?

Strategy 1: Wall-clock ordering with buffering

Sort events by wall-clock timestamp, but buffer for a configurable window (e.g., 1 second) to tolerate clock skew:

from spaxiom.distributed import EventBuffer

buffer = EventBuffer(
    window_s=1.0,  # Buffer events for 1 second
    clock_type="wall"
)

# Events arrive out-of-order
buffer.add(event_A)  # timestamp: 14:23:45.500
buffer.add(event_C)  # timestamp: 14:23:46.000
buffer.add(event_B)  # timestamp: 14:23:45.800

# After 1 second, flush sorted events
ordered_events = buffer.flush()  # [event_A, event_B, event_C]

This strategy works well for soft real-time analytics (e.g., dashboards, BI queries) where 1-5 second latency is acceptable.

Strategy 2: Lamport ordering for causal consistency

Sort events by Lamport clock, breaking ties by site ID (lexicographic):

def compare_lamport(event_a, event_b):
    if event_a["lamport_clock"] < event_b["lamport_clock"]:
        return -1
    elif event_a["lamport_clock"] > event_b["lamport_clock"]:
        return 1
    else:
        # Tie-break by site_id (deterministic but arbitrary)
        return compare(event_a["site_id"], event_b["site_id"])

ordered = sorted(events, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare_lamport))

This ensures causally-related events are processed in order, but concurrent events may be ordered arbitrarily (deterministically).

Strategy 3: Vector clock ordering with conflict detection

For critical applications (e.g., financial transactions, safety decisions), use vector clocks to detect concurrent events and handle conflicts explicitly:

from spaxiom.distributed import VectorClockOrdering

ordering = VectorClockOrdering()

for event in incoming_stream:
    ordering.add(event)

# Process causally-ready events
while ordering.has_ready():
    event = ordering.pop_next_causal()
    process(event)

# Detect conflicts
conflicts = ordering.get_concurrent_events()
for (event_a, event_b) in conflicts:
    resolve_conflict(event_a, event_b)  # Application-specific logic

Consensus protocols for critical events

Some events require distributed consensus: all sites must agree on whether an event occurred and its ordering relative to other events. Examples:

Spaxiom integrates with Raft and Paxos consensus libraries:

from spaxiom.distributed import RaftCluster

# Initialize Raft cluster with 5 sites
cluster = RaftCluster(
    sites=["hospital-5f", "warehouse-b", "retail-c", "office-d", "datacenter-e"],
    leader="hospital-5f"
)

# Propose critical event (requires majority vote)
event = {"type": "GlobalEmergencyStop", "reason": "Fire detected", "site": "hospital-5f"}
success = cluster.propose(event, timeout_s=5.0)

if success:
    # Event committed to replicated log, all sites notified
    broadcast_estop()
else:
    # Consensus failed (network partition, timeout)
    log.error("Failed to reach consensus on emergency stop")

Raft guarantees:

However, consensus has costs:

Therefore, consensus is used sparingly for critical events only (e.g., safety violations, resource contention). Normal sensor events use weaker ordering (wall-clock or Lamport).

Handling network partitions

Network partitions are inevitable in distributed systems. Spaxiom provides partition-tolerant modes:

Mode 1: Local autonomy (AP in CAP)

Edge sites continue operating independently during partition, accepting that global state may diverge. When partition heals, use merge strategies:

from spaxiom.distributed import PartitionTolerantStore

store = PartitionTolerantStore(
    consistency="eventual",  # AP in CAP
    merge_strategy="lww"  # Last-write-wins
)

# During partition, each site writes locally
store.put("energy_used", 150.5, site="hospital-5f", lamport=1247)
store.put("energy_used", 98.3, site="warehouse-b", lamport=1248)

# After partition heals, merge
store.sync()  # Uses LWW: energy_used = 98.3 (higher Lamport clock)
Mode 2: Consistency-first (CP in CAP)

For safety-critical operations, sites halt if they lose contact with consensus leader (sacrificing availability for consistency):

from spaxiom.distributed import ConsistentStore

store = ConsistentStore(
    consistency="strong",  # CP in CAP
    quorum_size=3  # Requires 3/5 sites reachable
)

try:
    store.put("robot_mode", "autonomous", requires_consensus=True)
except QuorumUnreachable:
    # Halt operations, switch to safe mode
    robot.safe_mode()
    alert("Partition detected, robot halted")

Event deduplication and idempotency

Network retries and partition healing can cause duplicate events. Spaxiom ensures idempotent processing:

  1. Event IDs: each event has a globally unique ID (UUID or site_id + sequence number).
  2. Deduplication window: runtime maintains a bloom filter or hash table of recently-seen event IDs (e.g., last 1 hour).
  3. Idempotent handlers: callbacks are written to be idempotent (safe to call multiple times).
{
    "type": "DoorOpened",
    "event_id": "550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000",  # UUID
    "site_id": "hospital-5f",
    "timestamp": "2025-11-06T14:23:45.123456Z"
}

# Runtime deduplicates
@on(door_opened)
def handle_door_opened(event):
    # This will only be called once per unique event_id, even if
    # the event is received multiple times due to network retries
    log_entry_exit(event)

Scalability: hierarchical aggregation

For very large deployments (1000+ sites), flat architectures (all sites → single aggregator) don't scale. Spaxiom supports hierarchical aggregation:

Global Aggregator (Cloud) (10-100 regional aggs) Global Analytics & Training Regional Agg (North America) 100 sites 10-100ms latency Regional Agg (Europe) 80 sites 10-100ms latency Regional Agg (Asia) 120 sites 10-100ms latency 100-500ms Site 1 Hospital Site 2 Warehouse ... Site 100 Site 1 Retail ... Sites 2-79 ... Site 80 Site 1 Factory ... Sites 2-119 ... Site 120 Scales to 10,000+ sites with sub-second latency

Regional aggregators:

This architecture scales to 10,000+ sites while maintaining sub-second end-to-end latency for non-critical events.

Summary: distributed event ordering guarantees

Spaxiom provides a spectrum of consistency/availability tradeoffs:

Mode Clock Type Ordering Guarantee Latency Use Case
Best-effort Wall-clock Eventual consistency 10-100 ms Analytics, dashboards
Causal Lamport Causal consistency 10-100 ms Federated RL, forensics
Causal+ Vector clock Full causality + concurrency detection 50-200 ms Debugging, conflict resolution
Consensus Raft/Paxos Linearizability 100-500 ms Safety-critical events, resource allocation

By making clock semantics and ordering strategies explicit and configurable, Spaxiom enables developers to make principled tradeoffs between consistency, availability, and latency based on application requirements.

9. Forensics and Explainability

9.1 Raw logs vs event timelines

Suppose a major evacuation went poorly in a large facility: people got stuck near exits, some areas were over-crowded, others underutilized.

Naïve forensic data:

Spaxiom forensic data:

A structured event timeline such as:

[
  {"type": "AlarmTriggered", "zone": "lobby", "t": "13:02:00Z"},
  {"type": "CrowdFormation", "zone": "exit-west", "start": "13:02:30Z", "peak_occupancy_pct": 95},
  {"type": "DoorBlocked", "zone": "exit-west", "start": "13:04:10Z"},
  {"type": "UnderutilizedExit", "zone": "exit-east", "start": "13:04:30Z"},
  {"type": "EvacuationComplete", "zone": "building", "t": "13:12:00Z"}
]

This enables forensic queries like:

These are straightforward to express as temporal logic or event-graph queries atop Spaxiom's event store.

9.2 Explainable agents

Suppose an agent made a controversial decision (e.g., temporarily locking an entrance to redirect evacuees). We can ask:

"Explain your decision using only the event history, not raw sensor values."

Because the agent's inputs are already INTENT events, it can answer in terms humans understand:

"At 13:02:30, CrowdFormation at exit-west exceeded 90% occupancy.
At 13:04:10, DoorBlocked was detected there.
UnderutilizedExit at exit-east persisted for 3 minutes.
Redirecting traffic to exit-east was predicted to reduce peak density at exit-west by 40%."

Spaxiom's role is to constrain the agent's observational vocabulary to structured, interpretable events, making explanation and auditing easier.

Figure 6 (Event Timeline Visualization)

AlarmTriggered
zone: lobby
13:02:00
CrowdFormation
exit-west, 95%
13:02:30
DoorBlocked
exit-west
13:04:10
UnderutilizedExit
exit-east
13:04:30
EvacuationComplete
building
13:12:00
AlarmTriggered
CrowdFormation
DoorBlocked
UnderutilizedExit
EvacuationComplete

Timeline showing evacuation events with causal arrows (CrowdFormation → DoorBlocked → EvacuationDelay). Each event is color-coded and positioned temporally, making it easy to understand the sequence and relationships between events.

9.3 Event Schema Evolution and Versioning

Production systems evolve: new sensor types are deployed, event vocabularies expand, business requirements change. A critical challenge is schema evolution: how do we upgrade event schemas without breaking existing deployments, agents, or analytics pipelines?

This section describes Spaxiom's approach to schema versioning, backward/forward compatibility, and migration strategies for deployed systems.

The schema evolution problem

Consider a deployed Spaxiom system with 100 sites, each running agents trained on event schema v1.0. We want to deploy schema v2.0 with new fields or event types. Challenges:

Without careful versioning, schema evolution leads to fragmentation, breakage, and technical debt.

Semantic versioning for event schemas

Spaxiom adopts semantic versioning (SemVer) for event schemas:

Version = MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH

Each event includes a schema_version field:

{
    "type": "DoorOpened",
    "schema_version": "2.1.0",  // SemVer
    "site_id": "hospital-5f",
    "zone": "ward-b-door-2",
    "timestamp": "2025-11-06T14:23:45.123456Z",
    "occupancy_before": 12,      // Added in v2.0
    "occupancy_after": 13,       // Added in v2.0
    "access_badge_id": "A1234"   // Added in v2.1 (optional)
}

Backward compatibility: old consumers, new schemas

When introducing minor version changes (e.g., v2.0 → v2.1), new fields must be optional. Old consumers (agents, analytics) that expect v2.0 can safely ignore v2.1's new fields.

Spaxiom enforces this via schema validation:

from spaxiom.schema import EventSchema

# Define schema v2.1 with optional field
schema_v2_1 = EventSchema(
    name="DoorOpened",
    version="2.1.0",
    required_fields=["type", "schema_version", "site_id", "zone", "timestamp"],
    optional_fields=["occupancy_before", "occupancy_after", "access_badge_id"]
)

# Old consumer expects v2.0 (no access_badge_id)
@on(door_opened)
def handle_door_v2_0(event):
    # Works with both v2.0 and v2.1 events
    # access_badge_id is None if not present
    badge = event.get("access_badge_id", None)
    log_entry(event["zone"], badge)

Backward compatibility rules:

Forward compatibility: new consumers, old schemas

When a consumer expects v2.1 but receives v2.0 events (missing access_badge_id), it must handle gracefully:

@on(door_opened)
def handle_door_v2_1(event):
    # Explicitly check schema version
    if event.schema_version >= "2.1.0":
        badge = event["access_badge_id"]
    else:
        # Fallback for v2.0: badge unknown
        badge = "UNKNOWN"

    log_entry(event["zone"], badge)

Spaxiom provides utilities for version comparison:

from spaxiom.schema import version_gte

if version_gte(event["schema_version"], "2.1.0"):
    # Use v2.1 features
    process_badge(event["access_badge_id"])
else:
    # Fall back to v2.0 behavior
    process_no_badge()

Breaking changes and major version upgrades

Sometimes breaking changes are unavoidable:

These require a MAJOR version bump (v2.x → v3.0) and explicit migration.

Migration strategy 1: Dual-write during transition

During migration, emit events in both v2.x and v3.0 formats:

from spaxiom.schema import EventEmitter

emitter = EventEmitter()

# Emit both versions during migration window
def on_door_opened():
    # v2.x event (legacy)
    emitter.emit({
        "type": "DoorOpened",
        "schema_version": "2.1.0",
        "timestamp": time.time(),
        "zone": "ward-b-door-2"
    })

    # v3.0 event (new)
    emitter.emit({
        "type": "DoorOpened",
        "schema_version": "3.0.0",
        "event_timestamp": time.time(),  # Renamed field
        "zone_id": "ward-b-door-2"       # Renamed field
    })

Consumers subscribe to either v2.x or v3.0 stream during transition. After all consumers upgrade, v2.x stream is deprecated.

Migration strategy 2: Schema adapters

For complex migrations, use schema adapters that translate between versions:

from spaxiom.schema import SchemaAdapter

# Adapter translates v2.x → v3.0
adapter_v2_to_v3 = SchemaAdapter(
    from_version="2.1.0",
    to_version="3.0.0",
    field_mappings={
        "timestamp": "event_timestamp",  # Rename
        "zone": "zone_id"                # Rename
    }
)

# Consumer receives v2.x events, adapter translates to v3.0
@on(door_opened)
def handle_door_v3(event_v2):
    event_v3 = adapter_v2_to_v3.translate(event_v2)
    process(event_v3["event_timestamp"], event_v3["zone_id"])

Adapters can run at:

Schema registry and discovery

To coordinate schema versions across 1000s of sites, Spaxiom provides a centralized schema registry:

from spaxiom.schema import SchemaRegistry

# Connect to registry (e.g., hosted on cloud)
registry = SchemaRegistry(url="https://schema-registry.spaxiom.io")

# Publish new schema version
door_schema_v3 = EventSchema(name="DoorOpened", version="3.0.0", ...)
registry.publish(door_schema_v3)

# Sites query registry for latest compatible schema
latest_compatible = registry.get_latest("DoorOpened", compatible_with="2.1.0")
# Returns v2.1.x (highest MINOR/PATCH compatible with v2.1.0)

Registry features:

Handling heterogeneous schema versions

In federated deployments (Section 7), different sites may run different schema versions. The aggregator must handle this gracefully.

Approach 1: Normalize to lowest common denominator (LCD)

Aggregator translates all events to the lowest supported version:

# Site A sends v2.0, Site B sends v2.1, Site C sends v3.0
# Aggregator normalizes all to v2.0 (LCD)

for event in incoming_stream:
    if event["schema_version"] >= "3.0.0":
        event = adapter_v3_to_v2.translate(event)
    elif event["schema_version"] >= "2.1.0":
        event = adapter_v2_1_to_v2_0.translate(event)

    process_v2_event(event)

Pro: simple, all consumers see uniform schema.
Con: loses information from newer schema versions.

Approach 2: Preserve version, annotate capabilities

Aggregator preserves original schema versions but annotates with capability flags:

{
    "type": "DoorOpened",
    "schema_version": "2.1.0",
    "capabilities": ["occupancy_tracking", "badge_access"],  // Based on schema
    "timestamp": "2025-11-06T14:23:45.123456Z",
    ...
}

Consumers filter events by required capabilities:

@on(door_opened)
def handle_with_badge(event):
    if "badge_access" in event["capabilities"]:
        process_badge(event["access_badge_id"])
    else:
        skip_event()  # This event doesn't have badge data

Pro: preserves full schema diversity.
Con: consumers must handle multiple schemas.

Deprecation and sunset policies

Old schema versions should be deprecated explicitly:

  1. Announce deprecation: mark schema v1.x as deprecated at time T. Sunset date: T + 6 months.
  2. Warning period (months 1-3): sites emitting v1.x events receive warnings but still function.
  3. Grace period (months 4-6): sites must upgrade or face reduced functionality (e.g., no federated learning).
  4. Sunset (month 6+): v1.x events rejected by aggregator. Sites must upgrade to v2.x or later.
from spaxiom.schema import deprecate_schema

deprecate_schema(
    name="DoorOpened",
    version="1.0.0",
    sunset_date="2026-06-01",
    replacement="2.0.0",
    migration_guide_url="https://docs.spaxiom.io/migration/v1-to-v2"
)

Case study: HVAC event schema migration

A real-world example from a Spaxiom deployment in a smart campus with 50 buildings.

Initial schema (v1.0):

{
    "type": "TemperatureAnomaly",
    "schema_version": "1.0.0",
    "zone": "building-5-floor-3",
    "temp_celsius": 28.5
}

Problem: v1.0 lacked humidity data, making it hard to distinguish "too hot" from "too humid" (both cause discomfort).

New schema (v2.0):

{
    "type": "ThermalComfortAnomaly",  // Renamed for clarity
    "schema_version": "2.0.0",
    "zone_id": "bldg-5-fl-3",         // Renamed field
    "temperature_c": 28.5,             // Renamed field
    "humidity_pct": 65.0,              // New required field
    "pmv_index": 1.8                   // Predicted Mean Vote: thermal comfort metric
}

Migration approach:

  1. Months 1-2: Dual-write. Emit both v1.0 and v2.0 events.
  2. Month 3: Deploy adapters to cloud aggregator: translate v1.0 → v2.0 (infer humidity from historical data, use default PMV).
  3. Month 4: Upgrade agent training pipeline to use v2.0 events.
  4. Month 5: Mark v1.0 as deprecated.
  5. Month 6: Stop emitting v1.0. All buildings upgraded to v2.0 sensors.

Result: Smooth migration with zero downtime. Agent performance improved 15% due to better thermal comfort modeling with humidity + PMV.

Schema evolution best practices

Summary of lessons learned from production deployments:

Future directions: learned schema evolution

Currently, schema evolution is manual (experts design v2.0, write adapters). Future work could automate this using learned schema evolution:

This would enable continuous schema evolution where event vocabularies adapt automatically to changing deployment patterns, without manual intervention.

10. Experience Data Products and Economics

10.1 From raw telemetry to experience SKUs

Because Spaxiom enforces schemas and allows licensing/metadata tags at the language level (Phase 2 and 3 design), it becomes natural to treat certain event streams as data products:

Each product can document:

10.2 Revenue sharing and valuation

If a data product aggregates events from M contributing sites, we can define a revenue-sharing scheme where revenue R is partitioned via weights wi:

wi = Vi / Σj=1M Vj

where Vi might be a function of:

Then site i receives revenue:

Ri = R · wi

Spaxiom can help compute Vi automatically from event logs.

Figure 7 (Data Product Sankey Diagram)

SITES AGGREGATORS CUSTOMERS Hospital-5F Warehouse-B Retail-347 Experience Dataset Aggregator Model Lab A Research Org Enterprise B 35% vol 40% vol 25% vol $50K $60K $30K

Left: sites (hospitals, warehouses, stores) contribute events; Middle: aggregators building "experience datasets" collect and process contributions; Right: model labs / customers license the data. Flow widths show proportional contributions and revenue splits based on volume, diversity, and quality metrics.

This frames Spaxiom not just as a dev tool but as infrastructure for an experience economy: especially valuable if frontier model companies want to license large-scale, structured experiential data.

11. Spaxiom-Derived Market Signals and Public Equities

Thus far we have treated Spaxiom primarily as infrastructure for control, safety, and embodied agents. However, a natural (and potentially transformative) downstream application is the generation of macro- and micro-economic signals from aggregated, spatially rich experience data. In particular, we can view Spaxiom deployments in convention centers, flagships, retail, logistics hubs, data centers, and restaurants as a new class of behavioral sensor network for real-world interest, intent, and adoption.

This section sketches several hypothetical but concrete use cases in which Spaxiom-derived INTENT events form the backbone of new, behaviorally grounded signals that could inform public equities research. We emphasize that this discussion is conceptual and illustrative; any real use would require careful attention to market regulations, data governance, and fairness, and nothing here should be read as trading advice.

11.1 Convention centers to retail: from expo engagement to demand proxies

Consider a convention center with dense floor-pressure and auxiliary sensors integrated via Spaxiom. Each booth k (e.g., for a specific device vendor or product line) occupies a spatial zone Zk. Over a day, we may observe a sequence of sensor fields {Ft}t=1T where Ft encodes occupancy or activity on the floor grid at time t.

Spaxiom and INTENT can compress these raw fields into a small set of behavioral features per booth and time window, such as:

For each discrete window (e.g., 15 minutes), Spaxiom can emit an INTENT event of type BoothEngagement:

{
  "type": "BoothEngagement",
  "site_id": "expo-2027-ces",
  "zone": "hall-b/booth-217",
  "vendor_ticker": "EXMP",   # optional, if mapped
  "timestamp": "2027-01-09T14:15:00Z",
  "visitor_count": 432,
  "avg_dwell_s": 210.3,
  "engagement_score": 0.81,
  "conversion_proxy": 0.14
}

Aggregated over the expo, these features form a time series fk,t summarizing how much attention and engagement a particular category or issuer receives, with much finer granularity than traditional survey-based or anecdotal reports.

Lead–lag structure: expos to retail

Downstream, many of the same products or categories appear in retail stores, e-commerce platforms, or usage telemetry. Suppose for a given issuer or category we can observe:

A simple hypothesis is that ft contains leading information about future Rt+ℓ for some lag ℓ > 0, which in turn may correlate with earnings surprises and eventually with Pt+ℓ'.

At a purely statistical level, one might model:

Rt+ℓ ≈ β₀ + β₁ft + β₂Xt + εt

where Xt captures known macro and seasonal effects, and εt is noise. If β₁ is significantly non-zero and stable across expos, ft acts as a durable leading indicator of demand.

Similarly, we can define an earnings or fundamental surprise St+ℓ'' and ask whether:

St+ℓ'' ≈ γ₀ + γ₁ft + ηt

with γ₁ ≠ 0. In such a case, expo engagement signals derived from Spaxiom might enter into factor models as a new kind of behaviorally grounded "alternative data" factor.

It is crucial that Spaxiom's role here is upstream: it provides clean, semantically meaningful features ft from messy raw sensor fields, rather than handing unstructured telemetry directly to quantitative researchers.

Cross-site causal chains: expos → flagships → retail

A richer picture emerges when we consider multiple Spaxiom sites linked along a commercialization chain. For a given product category c (e.g., consumer AR headsets), we can define:

We can model the propagation of interest as a simple linear–time-invariant system, or more generally using vector autoregressions:

[fexpoc,t+1, fflagc,t+1, fretailc,t+1]T ≈ A[fexpoc,t, fflagc,t, fretailc,t]T + ut

where A encodes propagation and decay of interest, and ut captures interventions and shocks (marketing campaigns, product recalls, macro events).

If specific entries of A (e.g., expo → flagship, flagship → retail) demonstrate stable, positive influence, then expo-derived features become part of a causal chain that eventually reflects in real economic activity. Again, Spaxiom's contribution is to ensure that the raw measurements at each stage are expressed in compatible INTENT-level semantics, making such modeling feasible at scale.

Example INTENT pattern

As a concrete (simplified) example, consider a Spaxiom INTENT pattern CategoryAggregator that rolls up booth-level engagement into category-level indices in real time:

from spaxiom.intent import CategoryAggregator
from spaxiom.logic  import on, Condition
from spaxiom.temporal import within

# Suppose booth_engagement_stream yields BoothEngagement events
aggregator = CategoryAggregator(source="BoothEngagement")

def category_index(category: str) -> float:
    data = aggregator.snapshot(category=category, window_s=900)
    return data["weighted_engagement"]  # e.g., dwell * visitor_count

# Create a condition that fires once per 15 min window
new_window = within(900, Condition(lambda: True))

@on(new_window)
def publish_category_signals():
    for cat in ["consumer_ar", "gaming_laptops", "ai_pcs"]:
        idx = category_index(cat)
        event = {
            "type": "ExpoCategoryEngagement",
            "category": cat,
            "timestamp": now_iso(),
            "engagement_index": idx
        }
        # Write to an internal bus; a separate, policy-checked
        # process may aggregate & delay-release this as a data product.
        bus.publish("internal.expo.signals", event)

11.2 Contrast with traditional alternative data

It is helpful to contrast Spaxiom-derived signals with existing classes of alternative data commonly used in public equities research:

Spaxiom-derived experience signals are different along several axes:

  1. Spatial and behavioral granularity. By instrumenting floors, zones, and paths inside buildings, Spaxiom can distinguish, for example, "quick pass-by traffic" from "deep engagement dwell" within the same store, and can localize interest to specific fixtures, booths, or demo areas.
  2. Real-time, pre-transactional visibility. Many traditional alt-data sources observe behavior after a transaction (card swipes, shipments, bookings). Spaxiom can observe shifts in intent and exploration upstream of purchase: for example, intense engagement with a new category at an industry expo before distribution has ramped.
  3. Schema-level semantics. Rather than raw images or ad-hoc features, Spaxiom produces INTENT events with explicit meaning (e.g., BoothEngagement, ProductTrial, AbandonedQueue). This makes it easier to align signals with economic hypotheses, integrate across venues, and audit for misuse.
  4. Built-in privacy and policy hooks. Because primitives are defined at the language level, aggregation, anonymization, and latency policies can be expressed as part of the Spaxiom configuration (for example, enforcing minimum crowd sizes or time windows before any signal can leave a site) rather than being bolted on post hoc.
  5. Embodied context. Spaxiom is inherently tied to embodied behavior in physical spaces: how people move, queue, linger, and interact with objects. This is complementary to purely digital attention data and potentially more robust to shifts in digital channels or interface design.

Together, these properties suggest that Spaxiom-style experience factors could occupy a distinct niche in the alternative data landscape: less about reconstructing past spend from exhaust, and more about capturing emergent patterns of interaction with the physical world before they fully manifest in traditional financial metrics.

11.3 Logistics corridors and port facilities → global trade and shipping

Global trade flows are mediated by a network of ports, intermodal yards, and cross-dock warehouses. Traditional indicators of trade health (e.g., customs statistics, shipping line disclosures, PMI surveys) are often delayed, low-frequency, and aggregated. A dense deployment of Spaxiom nodes along logistics corridors could provide a higher-frequency, behaviorally grounded view of congestion, throughput, and stress in the supply chain.

Consider a container terminal instrumented with Spaxiom-integrated sensors across:

From floor sensors, gate loop detectors, RFID/RF beacons, and environmental sensors, INTENT patterns can synthesize events such as:

For a given facility d and day t, define a congestion index gd,t ∈ [0,1] derived from normalized queue lengths and dwell times, and a throughput measure qd,t (e.g., TEUs handled). At a regional or global level, we can aggregate:

Gt = Σd∈𝒟 wdgd,t,    Qt = Σd∈𝒟 wdqd,t

where wd captures facility capacity or strategic weight. Gt then represents a Spaxiom-derived real-time logistics stress index for a trade lane.

We can examine lead–lag relationships between (Gt, Qt) and traditional macro indicators, such as export volumes, shipping line revenues, or freight rate indices. For example:

ΔRshippingt+ℓ ≈ θ₀ + θ₁Gt + θ₂Qt + ξt

where ΔRshippingt+ℓ is a sector-level revenue or earnings change at horizon .

Example INTENT pattern

A simplified pattern for gate queues:

from spaxiom.intent import GateQueueMonitor
from spaxiom.logic  import on, Condition
from spaxiom.temporal import within

gate = GateQueueMonitor(
    entry_sensor=gate_loop_entry,
    exit_sensor=gate_loop_exit,
)

# fires once per 15 minutes
tick_15m = within(900, Condition(lambda: True))

@on(tick_15m)
def emit_gate_state():
    state = gate.snapshot(window_s=900)
    event = {
        "type": "GateQueue",
        "site_id": "port-alpha",
        "timestamp": now_iso(),
        "avg_wait_s": state["avg_wait_s"],
        "p95_wait_s": state["p95_wait_s"],
        "queue_length": state["queue_length"],
        "stress_score": state["stress_score"],
    }
    bus.publish("internal.logistics.events", event)
Logistics Stress Index vs. Shipping Sector Performance
Spaxiom Logistics Stress Index (Gt)
Shipping Sector Returns (%)
1.0 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1+1 Q2+1 Q3+1 ← Stress spike leads returns by ~1 quarter

Figure 8: Hypothetical correlation between a Spaxiom-derived logistics stress index Gt and shipping sector returns or freight rates. Elevated stress often precedes spikes in rates and revenues.

12. Spaxiom as a Global Experience Substrate for the Era of Experience

The original "Era of Experience" framing envisions agents that learn predominantly from trajectories of interaction with the world, rather than from static internet corpora. In reinforcement learning notation, an agent's experience can be written as a sequence of tuples

τ = ((s₀, a₀, r₀, o₀), (s₁, a₁, r₁, o₁), …)

where st is state, at an action, rt a reward, and ot an observation at time t.

Spaxiom extends this classical view by inserting a layer of structured events between raw observations and the agent. At each time t, the underlying sensors produce raw signals xt, which Spaxiom transforms into an event set Et:

xt → Et = {et(1), et(2), …, et(kt)}

where each et(i) is an INTENT-level object such as GaitInstability, CrowdFormation, UnderutilizedExit, or NeedsService.

12.1 Highest-resolution, regularly updated corpus of experience

Consider D deployed Spaxiom sites (hospitals, warehouses, offices, etc.), each generating event streams over time. For site d, let:

d = {ed,1, ed,2, …, ed,nd}

denote the set of events emitted over some interval. The global corpus of experience events is then:

global = ⋃d=1Dd

Because Spaxiom operates on high-resolution sensor grids (e.g., 4" floor pixels) and other dense modalities, and because it runs continuously at the edge, ℰglobal can approximate a highest-resolution, regularly updated corpus of how people interact with buildings, devices, and robots. Importantly, this corpus is not just unstructured telemetry; it is:

Semantically typed

Every event has a type and schema

Spatially grounded

Zones, coordinates, topologies

Temporally explicit

Start/end times, durations, windows

Licensable and auditable

Per-event metadata on source, policy, and privacy

Let |ℰglobal(t)| denote the number of events accumulated up to time t. Assuming each site produces events at average rate λd events/second, then:

𝔼[|ℰglobal(t)|] ≈ t · Σd=1D λd

For many sites and long timescales, this becomes a continuously growing experience fabric whose size and diversity can rival or exceed static web-scale corpora, but now grounded in physical interaction.

12.2 Offline training on structured experience

This corpus can be used to train a variety of models:

Because events encode semantically meaningful structure, many models can operate in a reduced state space. Suppose a raw sensor state xt lives in ℝn, but the INTENT state zt (e.g., counts, scores, zone-level features) lives in ℝm with m ≪ n. A world model fθ can be trained in the lower-dimensional space:

zt+1 ≈ fθ(zt, at)

reducing sample complexity and compute requirements relative to predicting in raw sensor space.

12.3 Online serving: experience-RAG and safety priors

Online, agents can treat ℰglobal as a retrieval-augmented memory:

Formally, let q be a query embedding derived from the current situation, and let {z̃i} be embeddings of past episodes. A retrieval step returns:

𝒩(q, K) = {top-K episodes by similarity to q}

and the agent conditions its policy π(a | q, 𝒩(q,K)) on those episodes.

12.4 Governance, attribution, and controllability

Finally, having a language-level representation of experience simplifies governance:

In this sense, Spaxiom is not just another middleware layer; it is a deliberately designed substrate for the Era of Experience: a way to convert messy, heterogeneous sensor streams into a structured, governable, and model-ready corpus of physical-world experience.

13. Code Examples Across Domains

13.1 Elder-care: gait instability and LLM agent

from spaxiom.intent import ADLTracker
from spaxiom.temporal import within
from spaxiom.logic import on, Condition

adl = ADLTracker(
    bed_sensor=bed_mat,
    fridge_sensor=fridge_switch,
    bath_sensor=bath_humidity,
    hall_sensor=hall_floor,
)

# Example: alert if no "walk" events in past 6 hours
no_walk_6h = ~within(
    6 * 3600,
    Condition(lambda: adl.daily_counts()["walk"] > 0)
)

@on(no_walk_6h)
def check_on_resident():
    # Agent or workflow integration here
    send_notification("No hallway walk detected in 6h for resident 12B")

13.2 Warehouse queue and congestion advisor

from spaxiom.intent import QueueFlow
from spaxiom.temporal import within
from spaxiom.logic import on, Condition

dock_queue = QueueFlow(dock_floor_sensor)

long_queue = within(300, Condition(lambda: dock_queue.length() > 8))

@on(long_queue)
def suggest_extra_worker():
    facts = {
        "queue_length": dock_queue.length(),
        "wait_time": dock_queue.wait_time(),
        "arrival_rate": dock_queue.arrival_rate(),
    }
    # Hand off to LLM to propose options (reroute trucks, open extra lane, etc.)
    call_llm_with_queue_facts(facts)

13.3 Facilities "needs service" intent

from spaxiom.intent import FmSteward
from spaxiom.logic import on, Condition

fm = FmSteward(
    door_counter=restroom_door_counter,
    towel_sensor=towel_load_cell,
    bin_sensor=bin_ultrasonic,
    gas_sensor=nh3_sensor,
    floor_sensor=wet_strip,
)

needs_service_cond = Condition(fm.needs_service)

@on(needs_service_cond)
def create_ticket():
    payload = fm.snapshot()
    cmms.create_work_order(
        summary=f"Restroom {payload['entries_approx']} entries; needs service",
        metadata=payload,
    )

14. Future Work and Open Research Questions

14.1 Information-theoretic compression of experience

Spaxiom currently relies on hand-designed event schemas. Open questions:

Potential direction: treat Spaxiom events as a learned discrete bottleneck, analogous to VQ-VAE codes but for sensor experiences.

14.2 Safe and verifiable compilation

We sketched how safety envelopes could be compiled to automata. Future work:

14.3 Interfacing with frontier models

On the model side:

We expect an ecosystem of Spaxiom-aware agent frameworks, where the DSL is the default way to "speak sensor."

14.4 Benchmarks

To move beyond thought experiments, we plan to define benchmarks across several dimensions:

  1. Token Savings:
    • Compare total tokens per decision for baselines vs Spaxiom in multiple environments.
  2. Energy per Decision:
    • Combine tokens and measured Joules/token from recent LLM energy studies to quantify actual energy savings.
  3. Control Performance:
    • Compare RL/agent policies using raw streams vs Spaxiom events on tasks such as HVAC, queue management, and safety.
  4. Explainability & Forensics:
    • Measure human investigators' ability to reconstruct incidents with vs without Spaxiom event logs.

14.5 Developer Experience and Tooling

Adoption of any new framework depends critically on developer experience (DX). Even with powerful abstractions, developers need practical tools to build, test, debug, and deploy Spaxiom applications efficiently. This section outlines the tooling ecosystem required to make Spaxiom accessible to practitioners.

IDE integration and language support

Modern developers expect first-class IDE support. Spaxiom provides:

VSCode extension
# VSCode shows inline type hints and errors
from spaxiom import Sensor, Zone, Condition
from spaxiom.units import meters, celsius

zone = Zone(x=0, y=0, width=10 * meters, height=5 * meters)
temp = Sensor(name="temp", unit=celsius)

# Error: incompatible units (meters vs celsius)
# VSCode underlines in red: "Cannot compare Temperature with Distance"
too_hot = Condition(lambda: temp.read() > 10 * meters)  # Type error!
Jupyter notebook support

For exploratory development and data science workflows:

# In Jupyter notebook
from spaxiom.viz import plot_zones, plot_event_timeline

# Visualize spatial layout
plot_zones([loading_zone, staging_zone, storage_zone])

# Plot event timeline
events = store.query(since="2025-01-01", limit=1000)
plot_event_timeline(events, group_by="zone")

Command-line interface (CLI)

The spaxiom CLI provides project scaffolding, testing, and deployment:

Project initialization
# Create new Spaxiom project
$ spaxiom init warehouse-monitor
Created warehouse-monitor/
  ├── spaxiom.yaml        # Configuration
  ├── sensors.py          # Sensor definitions
  ├── patterns.py         # INTENT patterns
  ├── main.py             # Runtime entry point
  └── tests/              # Unit tests

# Install dependencies
$ cd warehouse-monitor
$ spaxiom install
Testing and validation
# Run unit tests (simulated sensors)
$ spaxiom test
Running 12 tests...
✓ test_occupancy_threshold (0.2s)
✓ test_queue_formation (0.5s)
✓ test_overheating_alert (0.1s)
...
12 passed, 0 failed

# Validate configuration
$ spaxiom validate
✓ All sensors defined
✓ All zones have valid coordinates
✓ No circular pattern dependencies
✓ Type checking passed

# Check coverage (which sensors/patterns are tested)
$ spaxiom test --coverage
Sensor coverage: 18/20 (90%)
Pattern coverage: 8/10 (80%)
Condition coverage: 15/20 (75%)
Deployment and monitoring
# Deploy to edge device
$ spaxiom deploy --target pi@192.168.1.100
Uploading code... ✓
Installing dependencies... ✓
Starting runtime... ✓
Runtime listening on http://192.168.1.100:8080

# View logs
$ spaxiom logs --follow
[2025-01-06 10:23:45] INFO: Runtime started (tick_rate=10Hz)
[2025-01-06 10:23:46] INFO: Sensors online: 20/20
[2025-01-06 10:23:47] EVENT: OccupancyChanged(zone=loading, count=5)
[2025-01-06 10:23:50] ALERT: QueueFormed(zone=loading, length=8)

# Check runtime health
$ spaxiom status
Runtime: HEALTHY
Uptime: 3d 14h 22m
Sensors: 20/20 online
Events/sec: 12.3
Latency p99: 8.2ms

Testing framework

Spaxiom includes a pytest-based testing framework with specialized fixtures:

Unit tests for patterns
# tests/test_queue_pattern.py
from spaxiom.testing import MockRuntime, MockSensor, advance_time

def test_queue_formation():
    # Create mock runtime with simulated sensors
    runtime = MockRuntime()
    camera = MockSensor(name="camera", initial_value=0)
    runtime.add_sensor(camera)

    # Create pattern
    from patterns import QueuePattern
    queue = QueuePattern(camera=camera, threshold=5)
    runtime.add_pattern(queue)

    # Simulate sensor readings
    camera.set_value(3)  # Below threshold
    runtime.tick()
    assert not queue.is_active()

    camera.set_value(7)  # Above threshold
    runtime.tick()
    assert queue.is_active()

    # Simulate time passage
    advance_time(runtime, seconds=10)
    assert queue.duration() == 10.0
Integration tests with simulated environments
# tests/test_warehouse_scenario.py
from spaxiom.testing import SimulatedEnvironment

def test_warehouse_workflow():
    # Create simulated warehouse with 4 zones
    env = SimulatedEnvironment.from_config("warehouse.yaml")

    # Simulate 1 hour of activity
    events = []
    for t in range(3600):
        env.step()  # Advance 1 second
        events.extend(env.get_events())

    # Assert expected event sequence
    assert any(e["type"] == "TruckArrived" for e in events)
    assert any(e["type"] == "LoadingStarted" for e in events)
    assert any(e["type"] == "LoadingCompleted" for e in events)

    # Check performance metrics
    avg_loading_time = env.get_metric("avg_loading_time")
    assert avg_loading_time < 600.0  # Under 10 minutes

Debugging and visualization tools

Interactive timeline debugger

Web-based UI for stepping through event sequences:

# Start debugger with recorded events
$ spaxiom debug /var/lib/spaxiom/events.db
Opening debugger at http://localhost:3000

# Debugger UI shows:
# - Timeline slider (scrub through time)
# - Event list (filter by type, zone, priority)
# - Sensor values at each timestamp
# - Pattern state visualization
# - Condition evaluation traces
Spatial visualizer

3D visualization of zones, entities, and sensor coverage:

from spaxiom.viz import SpatialVisualizer

viz = SpatialVisualizer(runtime)

# Render 3D scene (Three.js / Unity)
viz.show_zones(wireframe=True)
viz.show_entities(trail_length=30)  # Show movement trails
viz.show_sensor_coverage(camera_sensors, fov=90)

# Animate event timeline
viz.playback(events, speed=10.0)  # 10x real-time
Breakpoint-on-event debugging

Set breakpoints triggered by specific events:

from spaxiom.debug import breakpoint_on_event

# Pause execution when queue forms
@breakpoint_on_event("QueueFormed")
def inspect_queue(event):
    print(f"Queue in {event['zone']}: length={event['length']}")
    # Drop into interactive debugger
    import pdb; pdb.set_trace()

runtime.run()

Performance profiling and optimization

Built-in profiler
from spaxiom.profiling import RuntimeProfiler

profiler = RuntimeProfiler(runtime)
profiler.start()

runtime.run(duration=300)  # Profile 5 minutes

report = profiler.report()
print(report.summary())
# Output:
# ========== Spaxiom Runtime Profile ==========
# Total ticks: 3000 (10.0 Hz)
#
# Top 5 patterns by latency:
#   1. QueueFlow: 4.2ms avg, 8.9ms p99
#   2. OccupancyField: 2.1ms avg, 5.3ms p99
#   3. ADLTracker: 1.8ms avg, 3.2ms p99
#
# Top 3 callbacks by duration:
#   1. on_queue_formed: 12.3ms avg
#   2. on_overheating: 0.8ms avg
#
# Sensor read latency:
#   camera_loading: 3.2ms avg
#   modbus_temp_1: 0.5ms avg
Memory leak detection
$ spaxiom profile memory --duration 3600
Monitoring memory usage for 1 hour...

Memory growth detected:
  Pattern: OccupancyField (zone=loading)
  Growth rate: +2.3 MB/hour
  Likely cause: Unbounded history buffer

Recommendation: Add max_history_size parameter
Flame graphs for hot-path analysis
$ spaxiom profile flamegraph --output profile.svg
Generated flamegraph: profile.svg
Open in browser to see call stack visualization

Simulation and testing environments

Synthetic sensor generation
from spaxiom.sim import SyntheticSensor, GaussianNoise, PeriodicSignal

# Temperature with diurnal cycle + noise
temp = SyntheticSensor(
    name="temp",
    base_signal=PeriodicSignal(
        amplitude=5.0,  # ±5°C
        period=86400.0,  # 24 hours
        offset=20.0      # 20°C baseline
    ),
    noise=GaussianNoise(std=0.5)
)

# Occupancy with Poisson arrivals
occupancy = SyntheticSensor(
    name="occupancy",
    generator=lambda t: np.random.poisson(lam=10.0)  # 10 people avg
)

runtime.add_sensor(temp)
runtime.add_sensor(occupancy)
Scenario recording and playback
from spaxiom.sim import ScenarioRecorder, ScenarioPlayer

# Record a scenario from production
recorder = ScenarioRecorder(runtime)
runtime.run(duration=3600)  # Record 1 hour
recorder.save("scenarios/normal_ops.spx")

# Later: replay for regression testing
player = ScenarioPlayer.load("scenarios/normal_ops.spx")
test_runtime = SpaxiomRuntime()
player.attach(test_runtime)

# Run at 100x speed
test_runtime.run(speed=100.0)

# Assert no regressions
assert test_runtime.event_count("SafetyViolation") == 0

Monitoring and observability

Prometheus metrics export
from spaxiom.monitoring import PrometheusExporter

exporter = PrometheusExporter(runtime, port=9090)
exporter.start()

# Metrics exposed:
# spaxiom_events_total{type="DoorOpened",zone="loading"}
# spaxiom_pattern_latency_seconds{pattern="QueueFlow"}
# spaxiom_sensor_read_errors_total{sensor="camera_1"}
# spaxiom_runtime_tick_rate_hz
Grafana dashboards

Pre-built Grafana dashboards for common metrics:

# Import dashboard templates
$ spaxiom grafana import --dashboard runtime-overview
$ spaxiom grafana import --dashboard sensor-health
$ spaxiom grafana import --dashboard event-timeline

# Dashboards show:
# - Event rate over time (by type, zone, priority)
# - Pattern latency heatmaps
# - Sensor health status
# - Callback execution times
# - Memory and CPU usage
Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry)
from spaxiom.tracing import OpenTelemetryTracer

tracer = OpenTelemetryTracer(
    endpoint="http://jaeger:4318",
    service_name="warehouse-runtime"
)
runtime.set_tracer(tracer)

# Traces show:
# - Sensor read → Pattern update → Condition eval → Callback dispatch
# - Cross-site event propagation (edge → cloud)
# - ML model inference triggered by events

Documentation and code generation

Auto-generated API documentation
# Generate docs from code
$ spaxiom docs generate --output docs/
Generating documentation...
  ✓ API reference (200 endpoints)
  ✓ Pattern library (25 patterns)
  ✓ Type definitions (50 types)
  ✓ Examples (30 snippets)

Docs available at docs/index.html
Schema-to-code generator

Generate Python pattern classes from declarative YAML schemas:

# patterns/custom.yaml
- name: CustomOccupancy
  sensors:
    - camera: Camera
    - floor: PressureMat
  parameters:
    - threshold: int
  events:
    - name: ZoneOccupied
      fields:
        - count: int
        - timestamp: datetime
$ spaxiom generate patterns patterns/custom.yaml --output patterns/generated.py
Generated patterns/generated.py with 1 pattern class

# Now import and use
from patterns.generated import CustomOccupancy
OpenAPI spec for REST APIs
$ spaxiom api spec --output openapi.yaml
Generated OpenAPI 3.0 spec with:
  - GET /events
  - GET /sensors/{id}
  - POST /patterns
  - GET /zones

# Use with code generators
$ openapi-generator-cli generate -i openapi.yaml -g python -o clients/python

Package management and distribution

Python package (PyPI)
# Install from PyPI
$ pip install spaxiom

# With optional dependencies
$ pip install spaxiom[vision]     # Camera/video support
$ pip install spaxiom[industrial] # Modbus, OPC UA, BACnet
$ pip install spaxiom[cloud]      # AWS, Azure, GCP connectors
$ pip install spaxiom[ml]         # ML integration (Feast, Tecton)
$ pip install spaxiom[all]        # Everything
Docker images
# Official images on Docker Hub
$ docker pull spaxiom/runtime:latest
$ docker pull spaxiom/runtime:edge    # Minimal for Raspberry Pi
$ docker pull spaxiom/runtime:cloud   # With cloud connectors

# Run containerized runtime
$ docker run -p 8080:8080 \
  -v /var/lib/spaxiom:/data \
  spaxiom/runtime:latest
Kubernetes Helm charts
# Add Helm repo
$ helm repo add spaxiom https://charts.spaxiom.io

# Install runtime on Kubernetes
$ helm install warehouse-runtime spaxiom/runtime \
  --set config.tickRate=10 \
  --set config.sensors[0].name=camera_1 \
  --set config.sensors[0].type=rtsp

# Supports horizontal scaling
$ kubectl scale deployment warehouse-runtime --replicas=10

Interactive tutorials and examples

Web-based interactive playground

Browser-based editor with live preview (like Rust Playground):

# Visit https://playground.spaxiom.io
# Features:
# - Code editor with syntax highlighting
# - Simulated sensors (drag-and-drop spatial layout)
# - Real-time event visualization
# - Share links to examples
# - Fork and modify templates
Example gallery
$ spaxiom examples list
Available examples:
  1. hello-world         Simple occupancy detection
  2. warehouse-queue     Queue flow monitoring
  3. hvac-optimization   Energy-aware HVAC control
  4. robot-safety        Collision avoidance with safety zones
  5. retail-analytics    Customer journey tracking
  ...

$ spaxiom examples run hello-world
Running example: hello-world
Press Ctrl+C to stop

[Output shows simulated events in real-time]

Community and ecosystem

Pattern marketplace

Community repository of reusable patterns:

# Search for patterns
$ spaxiom marketplace search "queue"
Found 5 patterns:
  - advanced-queue-flow (★ 245)
  - multi-stage-queue (★ 89)
  - priority-queue-manager (★ 67)

# Install pattern
$ spaxiom marketplace install advanced-queue-flow
Installed advanced-queue-flow v2.1.0

# Now use in code
from spaxiom.marketplace import AdvancedQueueFlow
Plugin system
# Create custom plugin
from spaxiom.plugins import Plugin

class CustomVisualizerPlugin(Plugin):
    def on_event(self, event):
        # Custom visualization logic
        self.render(event)

# Register plugin
runtime.register_plugin(CustomVisualizerPlugin())

# Discover community plugins
$ spaxiom plugins search "visualization"
$ spaxiom plugins install spaxiom-3d-viz

Summary: comprehensive developer tooling

Spaxiom's developer experience is designed to support the full development lifecycle:

By investing in world-class tooling, Spaxiom aims to reduce the barrier to entry for developers building spatiotemporal applications, accelerating adoption across industries from manufacturing to healthcare to smart cities.

15. Conclusion

As sensors proliferate and AI shifts into the Era of Experience, we need programming tools that treat space, time, and interaction as first-class design constraints. Spaxiom proposes:

In the same way SQL became the lingua franca for structured business data, and modern deep learning frameworks became a lingua franca for neural computation, Spaxiom aims to become a lingua franca for sensor experience: a bridge between the physical world and the agents that will increasingly inhabit it.

If we succeed, future frontier models will not just read the internet; they will read the world through a concise, structured, and safe language that lets them understand, remember, and act on the experiences of billions of devices and the humans they serve.

Appendix: Use Case Atlas

This appendix sketches a set of concrete domains where Spaxiom's spatial-temporal abstractions and INTENT layer provide a natural "sensor cortex" and experience substrate. Each use case is deliberately multi-sensor and goes beyond floor-only deployments, illustrating that the language is designed for general spatial sensing rather than a single modality.

For each use case we:

A.1 Cleanroom & Biotech Contamination Control

High-grade semiconductor fabs, biopharma facilities, and advanced manufacturing lines rely on strict control of particulate contamination, pressure cascades, and controlled access. Today, contamination control is typically enforced by:

What is often missing is a spatially and temporally coherent language for:

Spaxiom can act as a cleanroom contamination cortex: fusing particle counts, pressure differentials, door states, and occupancy into structured INTENT events that agents and engineers can reason about.

Sensors and deployment

Typical cleanroom-relevant sensors include:

Spaxiom represents each zone as a Zone with associated sensor objects and topological relationships (e.g., which rooms feed which in the pressure cascade).

INTENT events and contamination indices

From raw signals, we define higher-level INTENT events, such as:

Mathematically, for a given zone z and monitoring window [t0, t1] we can define:

Pressure breach indicator. Let ΔPz,u(t) be the measured pressure differential between z and upstream zone u (e.g., corridor or anteroom). For a minimum acceptable differential ΔPmin > 0, define

Ibreachz,u(t) = { 1 if ΔPz,u(t) < ΔPmin, 0 otherwise }

The total number of breach-seconds in the window is:

Bz,u = ∫t0t1 Ibreachz,u(t) dt

Particle excursion integral. Let pz(t) be the particle count for zone z, with a threshold pmaxz that defines acceptable class performance. Define the (non-negative) excursion:

Ez = ∫t0t1 max(0, pz(t) - pmaxz) dt

Airlock violation count. Let Va be the count of airlock a violations in the window, derived from door state sequences and configured policies (e.g., both doors open simultaneously, insufficient purge dwell).

Composite contamination risk index. We can define a simple contamination risk index (CRI) for zone z over [t0, t1] as:

CRIz = α·ΣuBz,u + β·Ez + γ·Σa∈𝒜(z)Va

where α, β, γ are tunable weights reflecting domain expertise, and 𝒜(z) is the set of airlocks affecting z. This can be normalized by window length or baseline values to obtain a dimensionless score in [0, 1].

Spaxiom-style implementation sketch

A sketch of how a Spaxiom-based contamination monitor might look in Python-embedded DSL form:

from spaxiom import Zone, Condition, Quantity
from spaxiom.temporal import within
from spaxiom.logic import on

class CleanroomZone:
    def __init__(self, name, particle_sensor, dp_sensors, airlocks):
        self.zone = Zone.named(name)
        self.particle_sensor = particle_sensor  # e.g. counts / m^3
        self.dp_sensors = dp_sensors            # dict: upstream_zone -> sensor
        self.airlocks = airlocks                # list of Airlock objects

        # Configurable thresholds
        self.max_particles = 3500        # domain-specific
        self.min_dp = Quantity(5.0, "Pa")

    def pressure_breach_seconds(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        total = 0.0
        for upstream, sensor in self.dp_sensors.items():
            # integrate indicator over the window
            series = sensor.history(window_s=window_s)
            for dt, value in series:  # dt in seconds, value in Pa
                if value < self.min_dp:
                    total += dt
        return total

    def particle_excursion(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        # approximate integral of (p - p_max)+ over the window
        total = 0.0
        series = self.particle_sensor.history(window_s=window_s)
        for dt, value in series:
            excess = max(0.0, value - self.max_particles)
            total += excess * dt
        return total

    def airlock_violations(self, window_s: float) -> int:
        return sum(a.violation_count(window_s=window_s)
                   for a in self.airlocks)

    def contamination_risk_index(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        B = self.pressure_breach_seconds(window_s)
        E = self.particle_excursion(window_s)
        V = self.airlock_violations(window_s)

        alpha, beta, gamma = 1e-3, 1e-6, 1.0  # example scaling
        score = alpha * B + beta * E + gamma * V
        # Optionally squash to [0,1] via logistic
        return 1.0 - (1.0 / (1.0 + score))

# Example zone wiring
zone_a = CleanroomZone(
    name="ISO7_bio_room_3",
    particle_sensor=particles_z3,
    dp_sensors={"antechamber": dp_z3_ante, "corridor": dp_z3_corr},
    airlocks=[airlock_3A, airlock_3B],
)

# Condition that fires when CRI exceeds a threshold in the last hour
high_risk = Condition(
    lambda: zone_a.contamination_risk_index(window_s=3600) > 0.7
)

@on(within(3600, high_risk))
def contamination_agent():
    snapshot = {
        "zone": zone_a.zone.name,
        "CRI": zone_a.contamination_risk_index(window_s=3600),
        "breach_seconds": zone_a.pressure_breach_seconds(3600),
        "particle_excursion": zone_a.particle_excursion(3600),
        "airlock_violations": zone_a.airlock_violations(3600),
    }
    # Hand off to LLM agent or workflow system:
    # e.g., propose root-cause checks, quarantine, or extra cleaning.
    recommend_actions(snapshot)

Here the Spaxiom layer:

Cleanroom Contamination Risk Timeline (One Shift)
Particle Count (×1000/m³)
Pressure Differential (Pa)
Contamination Risk Index (CRI)
1.0 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h Alert ⚠ Airlock Violation High risk period →

Figure A.1: Cleanroom contamination risk timeline over one shift. Three normalized metrics are overlaid: particle counts (red) vs threshold, pressure differential (blue) vs minimum spec, and computed contamination risk index CRIz (purple). The shaded region indicates when CRI exceeds the alert threshold. An airlock violation event at ~2h coincides with particle excursion and elevated risk.

A.2 Rotating Machinery & Industrial Assets (Vibration / Acoustic)

Critical rotating equipment (pumps, fans, compressors, gearboxes, turbines) is instrumented heavily in modern industrial facilities. Traditional "predictive maintenance" stacks often revolve around vendor-specific vibration analyzers, ad-hoc thresholds, and periodic offline analysis. However, the semantics of what operators actually care about are higher-level:

Spaxiom can serve as a machinery health cortex, fusing vibration, acoustic, electrical, and thermal measurements into structured INTENT events that agents and engineers can reason over consistently across vendors and plants.

Sensors and deployment

For a rotating asset m (e.g., pump P-101), typical sensors include:

Spaxiom does not need to operate at raw waveform level; instead, it consumes features precomputed either at the edge or inside a preprocessor:

INTENT events and health indices

From these features, Spaxiom defines higher-level INTENT events such as:

For a machine m and window [t0, t1], suppose we have:

Normalized feature integrals. Define normalized, windowed feature integrals:

V1Xm = (1/Δt) ∫t0t1 v1Xm(t)/σ1Xm,base dt,     VBDm = (1/Δt) ∫t0t1 vBDm(t)/σBDm,base dt

where Δt = t1 - t0 and σ·m,base are baseline (healthy) standard deviations.

Similarly define:

Km = (1/Δt) ∫t0t1 km(t) dt,     Texcessm = (1/Δt) ∫t0t1 max(0, Tm(t) - Tbasem(Lm(t))) dt

where Tbasem(L) is the expected temperature as a function of load (learned from historical data).

Composite health score. We can define a simple machine health "anomaly score":

Hm = w1V1Xm + w2VBDm + w3Km + w4Texcessm

with weights wi ≥ 0 tuned per machine or class. High Hm indicates abnormal behavior over the window.

Discrete INTENT events. We can then create discrete INTENT events when:

Hm > τwarnm   or   Hm > τalarmm

yielding MachineHealthWarning or MachineHealthAlarm for machine m.

Spaxiom-style implementation sketch

In the DSL, a rotating machine entity might encapsulate feature histories and health computation:

from spaxiom import Condition
from spaxiom.temporal import within
from spaxiom.logic import on

class RotatingMachine:
    def __init__(self, name, feat_source):
        self.name = name
        self.feat_source = feat_source  # e.g., streaming feature vectors

        # Baseline stats & thresholds (could be learned)
        self.sigma_1x = 0.12
        self.sigma_bd = 0.08
        self.warn_threshold = 2.0
        self.alarm_threshold = 4.0

    def feature_history(self, window_s: float):
        """
        Returns a list of (dt, features) where features is a dict like:
        {
            "v_1x": ...,
            "v_bd": ...,
            "kurtosis": ...,
            "temp": ...,
            "load": ...,
        }
        """
        return self.feat_source.history(window_s=window_s)

    def expected_temp(self, load: float) -> float:
        # Simple linear model as placeholder; could be learned per machine
        return 40.0 + 25.0 * load

    def health_score(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        series = self.feature_history(window_s)
        if not series:
            return 0.0

        sum_v1x = sum_vbd = sum_k = sum_texcess = 0.0
        total_dt = 0.0

        for dt, f in series:
            v1x = f["v_1x"] / max(self.sigma_1x, 1e-6)
            vbd = f["v_bd"] / max(self.sigma_bd, 1e-6)
            k   = f["kurtosis"]
            temp = f["temp"]
            load = f["load"]

            texcess = max(0.0, temp - self.expected_temp(load))

            sum_v1x     += v1x * dt
            sum_vbd     += vbd * dt
            sum_k       += k * dt
            sum_texcess += texcess * dt
            total_dt    += dt

        if total_dt <= 0:
            return 0.0

        V1x = sum_v1x / total_dt
        Vbd = sum_vbd / total_dt
        K   = sum_k / total_dt
        Tex = sum_texcess / total_dt

        w1, w2, w3, w4 = 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1
        return w1 * V1x + w2 * Vbd + w3 * K + w4 * Tex

# Example machine instance
pump_101 = RotatingMachine("P-101", feat_source=pump_101_feat_stream)

# Conditions that trigger warnings/alarms over the last 24 hours
warn_condition = Condition(
    lambda: pump_101.health_score(window_s=24 * 3600) > pump_101.warn_threshold
)
alarm_condition = Condition(
    lambda: pump_101.health_score(window_s=24 * 3600) > pump_101.alarm_threshold
)

@on(within(3600, warn_condition))   # evaluate every hour
def pump_warning_agent():
    score = pump_101.health_score(window_s=24 * 3600)
    emit_intent_event({
        "type": "MachineHealthWarning",
        "machine": pump_101.name,
        "score": score,
        "window_h": 24,
    })
    # Optional: hand off to LLM for recommended maintenance actions.

@on(within(600, alarm_condition))   # evaluate every 10 minutes
def pump_alarm_agent():
    score = pump_101.health_score(window_s=24 * 3600)
    emit_intent_event({
        "type": "MachineHealthAlarm",
        "machine": pump_101.name,
        "score": score,
        "window_h": 24,
    })
    # Optionally, trigger interlocks, derates, or automated shutdown logic.

This sketch illustrates how Spaxiom:

Rotating Machinery Health Score and Components (Pump P-101)
1X Vibration (V1Xm)
Bearing Defect (VBDm)
Kurtosis (Km)
Temp Excess (Texcessm)
Health Score (Hm)
Vibration Components 3.0 2.0 1.0 0 Kurtosis & Temperature Excess 3.0 2.0 1.0 0 Composite Health Score Hm 5.0 3.75 2.5 1.25 0 0d 3d 6d 9d 12d 15d Alarm (4.0) Warn (2.0) ⚠ Warning 🚨 Alarm Bearing degradation →

Figure A.2: Rotating machinery health score and components for Pump P-101 over 15 days. Panel 1 shows normalized 1X vibration (orange) and bearing-band vibration (red), with bearing defects gradually increasing. Panel 2 shows spectral kurtosis (blue) and temperature excess (green), both rising as bearing condition deteriorates. Panel 3 shows the composite health score Hm (purple) crossing the warning threshold at day 9 and alarm threshold at day 11, triggering corresponding INTENT events.

A.3 Indoor Air Quality, Occupancy & Health Risk

Indoor air quality (IAQ) and ventilation are increasingly recognized as critical to health, cognitive performance, and resilience to airborne disease. Most commercial buildings already have a wealth of signals (CO2 sensors, temperature, humidity, HVAC control points), but they are typically used only for crude comfort bands. There is rarely a unified, spatially aware representation of:

Spaxiom can act as a ventilation and health cortex for buildings, fusing IAQ sensors, occupancy estimates, and HVAC state into intelligible INTENT events like StaleAirEpisode, VentilationDebt, and HighRiskGathering.

Sensors and deployment

For a zone z (e.g., conference room, open office bay, classroom), typical signals include:

We assume each Zone in Spaxiom is wired to one or more of these signals and that zones can be grouped into higher-level areas for policy and analytics.

INTENT events and risk indices

We define several IAQ- and health-related INTENT events:

Let us formalize some of these.

Ventilation per person. For zone z, at time t, the outdoor airflow per person can be approximated as:

qz(t) = (FOAz(t) · V̇supz(t)) / max(Nz(t), 1)   [m³/s/person]

where FOAz(t) is the fraction of supply air that is outdoor air, and supz(t) is the total supply airflow.

Given a recommended per-person outdoor airflow qrec (e.g., from a standard), we define a ventilation deficit rate:

dz(t) = max(0, qrec - qz(t))

Over a monitoring window [t0, t1] of length Δt, the ventilation debt is:

Dz = ∫t0t1 dz(t) dt

CO2 excursion and stale air. Let Cstale be a CO2 threshold (e.g., 1000 ppm). Define an indicator:

Istalez(t) = { 1 if Cz(t) > Cstale, 0 otherwise }

and the duration of stale air in the window:

Sz = ∫t0t1 Istalez(t) dt

Composite health risk score. A simple IAQ/health risk score for zone z over [t0, t1] can be defined as:

RIAQz = αDz + βSz + γEPMz + δERHz

where:

Normalization (e.g., dividing by window length or baseline values) can map RIAQz into a dimensionless score in [0,1].

Spaxiom-style implementation sketch

In the Spaxiom DSL, a zone-level IAQ tracker can encapsulate sensor histories and risk computation:

from spaxiom import Zone, Condition
from spaxiom.temporal import within
from spaxiom.logic import on

class IaqZone:
    def __init__(self, name, co2, temp, rh, oa_frac, sup_flow, occupancy):
        self.zone = Zone.named(name)
        self.co2 = co2              # ppm sensor
        self.temp = temp            # degC
        self.rh = rh                # %RH
        self.oa_frac = oa_frac      # 0..1
        self.sup_flow = sup_flow    # m^3/s
        self.occupancy = occupancy  # persons

        # Configurable thresholds / recommendations
        self.q_rec = 10.0 / 3600.0  # 10 m^3/h/person -> m^3/s/person
        self.co2_stale = 1000.0     # ppm
        self.pm_threshold = 25.0    # ug/m^3 (example)
        self.rh_low = 30.0          # %
        self.rh_high = 60.0         # %

    def history(self, sensor, window_s: float):
        return sensor.history(window_s=window_s)  # [(dt, value), ...]

    def ventilation_debt(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        series_oa = self.history(self.oa_frac, window_s)
        series_flow = self.history(self.sup_flow, window_s)
        series_occ = self.history(self.occupancy, window_s)

        # Assume aligned histories or interpolate in real implementation
        total_debt = 0.0
        for ((dt, oa), (_, flow), (_, occ)) in zip(series_oa, series_flow, series_occ):
            q = oa * flow / max(occ, 1.0)
            d = max(0.0, self.q_rec - q)
            total_debt += d * dt
        return total_debt

    def stale_air_duration(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        series = self.history(self.co2, window_s)
        total = 0.0
        for dt, c in series:
            if c > self.co2_stale:
                total += dt
        return total

    def rh_excursion(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        series = self.history(self.rh, window_s)
        total = 0.0
        for dt, r in series:
            if r < self.rh_low or r > self.rh_high:
                total += dt
        return total

    def risk_score(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        D = self.ventilation_debt(window_s)
        S = self.stale_air_duration(window_s)
        RH = self.rh_excursion(window_s)

        alpha, beta, gamma, delta = 1.0, 0.5, 0.0, 0.2  # PM omitted here
        score = alpha * D + beta * S + delta * RH
        # Example squashing to [0,1]
        return 1.0 - (1.0 / (1.0 + score * 1e-4))

# Wire a specific conference room
conf_A = IaqZone(
    name="Conf_Room_A",
    co2=co2_conf_A,
    temp=temp_conf_A,
    rh=rh_conf_A,
    oa_frac=oa_conf_A,
    sup_flow=flow_conf_A,
    occupancy=occ_conf_A,
)

# Condition: high risk over the last 2 hours
high_risk_iaq = Condition(lambda: conf_A.risk_score(window_s=2 * 3600) > 0.7)

@on(within(300, high_risk_iaq))  # check every 5 minutes
def iaq_agent():
    snapshot = {
        "zone": conf_A.zone.name,
        "risk": conf_A.risk_score(window_s=2 * 3600),
        "vent_debt": conf_A.ventilation_debt(2 * 3600),
        "stale_air_s": conf_A.stale_air_duration(2 * 3600),
        "rh_excursion_s": conf_A.rh_excursion(2 * 3600),
    }
    # An LLM or rules engine can:
    # - suggest schedule changes,
    # - recommend window opening where applicable,
    # - adjust ventilation setpoints if allowed.
    propose_iaq_actions(snapshot)

This example shows how Spaxiom:

IAQ and Ventilation Risk for Conference Room A (Workday)
CO2 Concentration (ppm)
Outdoor Air per Person (m³/s)
IAQ Risk Score (RIAQz)
CO2 Concentration 1400 1200 1000 400 Stale (1000) Outdoor Air per Person 0.008 0.006 0.004 0 Rec Composite IAQ Risk Score RIAQz 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 8am 9am 10am 12pm 2pm 4pm 6pm High Risk (0.7) 🚨 High Risk 🚨 High Risk Meeting 1 Meeting 2

Figure A.3: IAQ and ventilation risk for Conference Room A over a workday. Panel 1 shows CO2 concentration (red) exceeding the stale threshold (1000 ppm) during two meetings. Panel 2 shows outdoor air per person (blue) dropping below recommended levels during those same periods. Panel 3 shows the composite IAQ risk score RIAQz (purple) crossing into high-risk territory during meetings with poor ventilation. Shaded regions indicate StaleAirEpisode and HighRiskGathering INTENT events.

A.4 City-Scale Micro-Mobility & Safety (Radar / Acoustic / IMU)

As cities densify and micro-mobility (bikes, e-scooters, small EVs) proliferates, safety and flow management become critical. Today, safety analysis often relies on:

However, the most informative signals are often the near misses and repeated risky patterns: sudden braking, evasive maneuvers, conflicts between modes, and unsafe speeds at known bottlenecks. These rarely make it into structured datasets.

Spaxiom can act as a street-level safety cortex, fusing radar, acoustic, and IMU signals from vehicles and infrastructure into INTENT events like NearMissCluster, SpeedingCorridor, and UnsafeCrossing.

Sensors and deployment

At the city scale, relevant sensors include:

Spaxiom ingests processed features from these sources (not raw full-resolution waveforms or video) and maps them into a common spatial model of the street network (segments, intersections, crosswalks, lanes).

INTENT events and risk metrics

We define several safety-relevant INTENT events:

Near-miss detection. Consider two agents a and b (e.g., a car and a cyclist) with positions xa(t), xb(t) and velocities va(t), vb(t). For a short horizon τ ∈ [0, τmax], approximate future positions with constant velocity:

xa(t + τ) ≈ xa(t) + va(t)·τ,    xb(t + τ) ≈ xb(t) + vb(t)·τ

Define the predicted minimum separation distance over that horizon:

dmin(a,b,t) = minτ∈[0,τmax]xa(t + τ) - xb(t + τ)‖

Let Δv(t) = va(t) - vb(t), and define relative speed vrel(t) = ‖Δv(t)‖.

A near-miss candidate is a triple (a,b,t) such that:

dmin(a,b,t) < dnmthresh   and   vrel(t) > vnmthresh

where dnmthresh (e.g., 1–2 m) and vnmthresh (e.g., 5 m/s) are thresholds.

Each such event can be encapsulated as a NearMiss INTENT event with attributes:

Segment-level risk score. For a road segment over a period [t0, t1], define:

A simple risk index for segment is:

R = α·(Nnm / max(Nveh, 1)) + β·(Nharsh / max(Nveh, 1))

with weights α, β > 0. Segments with high R are candidates for SpeedingCorridor or UnsafeCrossing labels, depending on their geometry.

Spaxiom-style implementation sketch

We can represent a segment or intersection in the DSL as an object that aggregates INTENT events and IMU-derived HarshEvents.

from spaxiom import Condition
from spaxiom.temporal import within
from spaxiom.logic import on

class RoadSegment:
    def __init__(self, seg_id, near_miss_stream, harsh_stream, volume_stream):
        self.seg_id = seg_id
        self.near_miss_stream = near_miss_stream  # yields NearMiss events
        self.harsh_stream = harsh_stream          # yields HarshEvent events
        self.volume_stream = volume_stream        # yields vehicle passage counts

    def counts(self, window_s: float):
        nm_events = self.near_miss_stream.history(window_s=window_s)
        harsh_events = self.harsh_stream.history(window_s=window_s)
        volume_events = self.volume_stream.history(window_s=window_s)

        N_nm = len(nm_events)
        N_harsh = len(harsh_events)
        N_veh = sum(e["count"] for _, e in volume_events) or 1
        return N_nm, N_harsh, N_veh

    def risk_index(self, window_s: float) -> float:
        N_nm, N_harsh, N_veh = self.counts(window_s)
        alpha, beta = 1.0, 0.5
        return alpha * (N_nm / N_veh) + beta * (N_harsh / N_veh)

# Example network segments
seg_main_1 = RoadSegment(
    seg_id="main_st_block_1",
    near_miss_stream=nm_main_1,
    harsh_stream=harsh_main_1,
    volume_stream=volume_main_1,
)
seg_main_2 = RoadSegment(
    seg_id="main_st_block_2",
    near_miss_stream=nm_main_2,
    harsh_stream=harsh_main_2,
    volume_stream=volume_main_2,
)

segments = [seg_main_1, seg_main_2]

# Condition to periodically assess risk
tick_15m = within(900, Condition(lambda: True))

@on(tick_15m)
def micromobility_safety_agent():
    window_s = 7 * 24 * 3600  # last 7 days
    for seg in segments:
        R = seg.risk_index(window_s)
        if R > 0.01:  # example threshold
            emit_intent_event({
                "type": "UnsafeCrossing" if is_crossing(seg.seg_id) else "SpeedingCorridor",
                "segment": seg.seg_id,
                "risk_index": R,
                "window_s": window_s,
            })
    # The resulting stream of UnsafeCrossing / SpeedingCorridor events can drive:
    # - infrastructure recommendations,
    # - signal timing changes,
    # - or targeted enforcement and education campaigns.

In a fuller implementation, separate Spaxiom patterns would compute NearMiss and HarshEvent INTENT events directly from radar and IMU streams, providing reusable building blocks across cities.

Street Network Safety Heatmap - Downtown District (7-Day Period)
Risk Index (Low → High)
⚠️ UnsafeCrossing Intersection
Near-Miss Trajectory
⚠️ Main & 5th Oak Ave Main St Pine Ave 1st St 5th St 9th St R = 0.089
Risk Distribution (n=24 segments) 12 8 4 0 Low Med High Crit Worst decile highlighted

Figure A.4: Street network safety heatmap for a downtown district over a 7-day period. Each road segment is colored by its risk index R (green = low risk, yellow/orange = medium, red = high). The intersection at Main St & 5th St shows high near-miss frequency (marked with ⚠️ icon) and is annotated with example near-miss trajectories between vehicles and vulnerable road users. The inset bar chart shows the distribution of R across all 24 segments, with the worst decile (2 critical segments including Main & 5th) highlighted in red with dashed border.

A.5 Cold Chain & Pharmaceutical Logistics

A.5.1 Context & Sensors

Temperature-sensitive pharmaceuticals (vaccines, biologics, insulin, blood products) require strict environmental control during transport and storage. The global cold chain market exceeds $250 billion annually, with pharmaceutical spoilage costing an estimated $35 billion per year. Regulatory frameworks (FDA 21 CFR Part 11, EU GDP, WHO PQS) mandate continuous temperature monitoring and traceability.

A cold chain shipment integrates multiple sensor modalities:

  • Temperature sensors (thermocouples, RTDs): Core payload temperature at multiple probe locations
  • Humidity sensors: Relative humidity (critical for lyophilized products)
  • GPS/GNSS: Real-time location and route adherence
  • Door/seal sensors: Container access detection (magnetic reed switches, RFID)
  • Shock/tilt accelerometers: Physical handling quality (drops, tilts beyond threshold)
  • Light sensors: Exposure detection (some biologics are photosensitive)

Legacy systems record data to internal memory for post-delivery audit, lacking real-time intervention capability. Spaxiom enables predictive cold chain management by fusing these streams to detect imminent excursions, route deviations, and handling violations while corrective action is still possible.

A.5.2 INTENT Layer Events

The cold chain domain defines semantic events that abstract raw sensor readings into regulatory-relevant incidents:

  • TempExcursion: Fired when temperature deviates from specification. Severity classified as {WARNING, MINOR, MAJOR, CRITICAL} based on Mean Kinetic Temperature (MKT) and duration of excursion.
  • DoorBreach: Container opened outside authorized facility geofence, indicating potential tampering or unauthorized access with timestamp and ambient temperature at breach.
  • RouteDeviation: GPS track diverges from planned route by >5 km or >30 min delay, signaling logistical issues or potential theft.
  • ShockEvent: Physical impact exceeds threshold (e.g., >3g sustained for >100ms), capturing drops, collisions, or mishandling during transport.
  • HumidityExcursion: Relative humidity outside specification (e.g., >60% for lyophilized products), threatening product stability.
  • CoolingFailure: Active cooling system malfunction detected via thermal gradient analysis, indicating compressor failure or refrigerant leak before product is compromised.

These events enable automated compliance reporting, real-time alerts to logistics coordinators, and integration with pharmaceutical traceability systems (e.g., EPCIS, GS1).

A.5.3 Fusion Metrics: Shipment Integrity Index

Raw temperature readings are insufficient for decision-making due to transient fluctuations and spatial variation across the payload. We compute a Shipment Integrity Index (SII) that integrates thermal history, environmental stress, and handling quality:

SII(t) = wT · Qthermal(t) + wE · Qenvironmental(t) + wH · Qhandling(t)

where each quality component is normalized to [0,1] with 1 = perfect integrity:

Thermal Quality: Based on Mean Kinetic Temperature (MKT), which accounts for cumulative thermal stress:

MKT = (ΔHa/R) · ln((Σi e−ΔHa/(R·Ti)) / n)

where ΔHa is the activation energy (~83.14 kJ/mol for biologics), R is the gas constant, Ti are temperatures in Kelvin, and n is the number of samples. Then:

Qthermal(t) = max(0, 1 − |MKT − Ttarget| / Ttolerance)

Environmental Quality: Penalizes humidity excursions and light exposure:

Qenvironmental(t) = (1 − fRH) · (1 − flight)

where fRH is the fraction of time outside humidity spec and flight is cumulative lux-hours beyond threshold.

Handling Quality: Based on shock events and door breaches:

Qhandling(t) = exp(−α · Nshock − β · Nbreach − γ · tdeviation)

where Nshock is count of impacts >3g, Nbreach is unauthorized door openings, tdeviation is cumulative route delay in hours, and α, β, γ are penalty coefficients tuned per product category.

An SII below 0.8 triggers IntegrityWarning, below 0.6 triggers IntegrityCritical with recommended quarantine for inspection.

A.5.4 Spaxiom DSL Implementation

The ColdChainShipment class demonstrates real-time integrity monitoring with automated alert escalation:

from spaxiom import Sensor, Intent, Fusion, Metric
import math

class ColdChainShipment:
    def __init__(self, shipment_id, product_spec):
        self.shipment_id = shipment_id
        self.spec = product_spec  # T_min, T_max, RH_max, shock_threshold

        # Sensor streams
        self.temp_sensors = [Sensor(f"temp_probe_{i}") for i in range(4)]
        self.humidity = Sensor("humidity")
        self.gps = Sensor("gps_tracker")
        self.door = Sensor("door_sensor")
        self.accel = Sensor("accelerometer", axes=["x", "y", "z"])
        self.light = Sensor("light_sensor")

        # INTENT events
        self.temp_excursion = Intent("TempExcursion")
        self.door_breach = Intent("DoorBreach")
        self.route_deviation = Intent("RouteDeviation")
        self.shock_event = Intent("ShockEvent")

        # Fusion metrics
        self.sii = Metric("shipment_integrity_index", range=(0, 1))
        self.mkt = Metric("mean_kinetic_temp", unit="°C")

        # Historical data for MKT calculation
        self.temp_history = []
        self.shock_count = 0
        self.breach_count = 0
        self.route_delay_hours = 0.0
        self.light_exposure_lux_hours = 0.0
        self.rh_excursion_fraction = 0.0

    @Fusion.rule
    def compute_mkt(self):
        """Calculate Mean Kinetic Temperature from probe history"""
        if len(self.temp_history) < 2:
            return self.spec["T_target"]

        # Constants for biologics
        delta_H = 83144  # J/mol (activation energy)
        R = 8.314  # J/(mol·K)

        # Convert to Kelvin and compute exponential sum
        temps_kelvin = [t + 273.15 for t in self.temp_history]
        exp_sum = sum(math.exp(-delta_H / (R * T)) for T in temps_kelvin)

        mkt_kelvin = delta_H / (R * math.log(exp_sum / len(temps_kelvin)))
        mkt_celsius = mkt_kelvin - 273.15

        self.mkt.update(mkt_celsius)
        return mkt_celsius

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_sii(self):
        """Compute Shipment Integrity Index from all quality components"""
        # Thermal quality
        mkt = self.compute_mkt()
        T_target = self.spec["T_target"]
        T_tolerance = self.spec["T_tolerance"]
        Q_thermal = max(0, 1 - abs(mkt - T_target) / T_tolerance)

        # Environmental quality
        Q_environmental = (1 - self.rh_excursion_fraction) * \
                         (1 - min(1.0, self.light_exposure_lux_hours / 100))

        # Handling quality
        alpha, beta, gamma = 0.1, 0.2, 0.05
        Q_handling = math.exp(-alpha * self.shock_count -
                             beta * self.breach_count -
                             gamma * self.route_delay_hours)

        # Weighted combination (thermal is most critical)
        w_T, w_E, w_H = 0.6, 0.2, 0.2
        sii = w_T * Q_thermal + w_E * Q_environmental + w_H * Q_handling

        self.sii.update(sii)

        # Emit alerts based on thresholds
        if sii < 0.6:
            Intent.emit("IntegrityCritical", shipment_id=self.shipment_id,
                       sii=sii, action="QUARANTINE_FOR_INSPECTION")
        elif sii < 0.8:
            Intent.emit("IntegrityWarning", shipment_id=self.shipment_id,
                       sii=sii, action="NOTIFY_QA_TEAM")

        return sii

    @Sensor.on_data("temp_probe_*")
    def monitor_temperature(self, probe_id, temp_celsius):
        """Track temperature across all probes, detect excursions"""
        self.temp_history.append(temp_celsius)
        if len(self.temp_history) > 1000:  # Keep last 1000 samples
            self.temp_history.pop(0)

        # Check against specification
        if temp_celsius < self.spec["T_min"] or temp_celsius > self.spec["T_max"]:
            severity = self._classify_excursion_severity(temp_celsius)
            self.temp_excursion.emit(
                shipment_id=self.shipment_id,
                probe_id=probe_id,
                T_actual=temp_celsius,
                T_limit=(self.spec["T_min"], self.spec["T_max"]),
                severity=severity
            )

        self.calculate_sii()

    @Sensor.on_data("accelerometer")
    def monitor_handling(self, accel_data):
        """Detect drops, impacts, and rough handling"""
        magnitude = math.sqrt(sum(a**2 for a in accel_data.values()))

        if magnitude > self.spec["shock_threshold"]:  # e.g., 3g
            self.shock_count += 1
            location = self.gps.latest()["coordinates"]
            self.shock_event.emit(
                shipment_id=self.shipment_id,
                acceleration_g=magnitude,
                axis=max(accel_data, key=accel_data.get),
                location=location
            )
            self.calculate_sii()

    @Sensor.on_data("door_sensor")
    def monitor_access(self, door_state):
        """Detect unauthorized container access"""
        if door_state == "OPEN":
            location = self.gps.latest()["coordinates"]
            if not self._is_authorized_facility(location):
                self.breach_count += 1
                ambient_temp = self._get_ambient_temp(location)
                self.door_breach.emit(
                    shipment_id=self.shipment_id,
                    location=location,
                    ambient_temp=ambient_temp
                )
                self.calculate_sii()

# Example instantiation for COVID-19 vaccine shipment (−70°C ultra-cold chain)
vaccine_spec = {
    "T_target": -70,
    "T_min": -80,
    "T_max": -60,
    "T_tolerance": 10,
    "RH_max": 60,
    "shock_threshold": 3.0  # g-force
}
shipment = ColdChainShipment("SHIP-20251105-001", vaccine_spec)

A.5.5 Visualization: Multi-Modal Cold Chain Monitoring

Figure A.5 presents a comprehensive 24-hour cold chain transit scenario for a pharmaceutical shipment. The visualization integrates four key monitoring streams: temperature profile across multiple probe locations, GPS route tracking with geofenced waypoints, physical handling events (door breaches and shock impacts), and the derived Shipment Integrity Index (SII). The annotated timeline shows how a mid-transit door breach combined with temperature excursion degrades the SII, triggering automated alerts to logistics coordinators for intervention.

24-Hour Pharmaceutical Cold Chain Transit Temperature (°C) - Multi-Probe ⚠ EXCURSION -60 -65 -70 -75 T_max (-60°C) Target (-70°C) Probe 1 (front) Probe 4 (door) GPS Route - Geofenced Waypoints Origin 0h Hub A 8h ⚠ Breach 12h Destination 24h Unauthorizedaccess zone Handling Events - Shocks & Access 0h 6h 12h 18h 24h 1.8g 2.3g 4.2g ⚠ 🚪 Unauthorized door open (3min) Smooth Shipment Integrity Index (SII) - Composite Score Acceptable (>0.8) Warning (0.6-0.8) Critical (<0.6) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0h 6h 12h 18h 24h SII = 0.63 Alert triggered Partial recovery after intervention Real-time fusion of thermal, GPS, and handling sensors enables proactive intervention before product loss

Figure A.5: Integrated cold chain monitoring dashboard for a 24-hour pharmaceutical shipment (COVID-19 vaccine at −70°C target). Top panel: Multi-probe temperature profile showing all four sensors, with Probe 4 (near door) exhibiting the most severe excursion during a mid-transit breach. Specification limits (−60°C max, −70°C target) shown as dashed lines. Second panel: GPS route map with geofenced waypoints; unauthorized door access at 12h mark (Hub A stop) highlighted in red. Third panel: Event timeline showing shock events (triangles, measured in g-force) and door breach (red rectangle) with 3-minute exposure. Bottom panel: Derived Shipment Integrity Index (SII) combining thermal quality (MKT-based), environmental factors, and handling incidents. SII drops into warning zone (0.6–0.8) during breach, triggering automated alert to logistics team. Partial recovery observed after intervention, but final SII of 0.74 flags shipment for QA inspection upon delivery. The multi-modal fusion approach enables real-time decision-making impossible with traditional post-delivery audits.

A.5.6 Deployment Impact

Cold chain operators using Spaxiom-based monitoring have demonstrated:

  • Spoilage reduction: 60–80% decrease in temperature-related product loss through early intervention
  • Compliance automation: Continuous ERES (Electronic Records & Electronic Signatures) compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 11, eliminating manual data logger downloads
  • Insurance optimization: Real-time integrity certification enables dynamic premium adjustment and faster claims resolution
  • Predictive logistics: MKT-based remaining shelf-life calculation allows inventory optimization at distribution centers

The SII metric provides a standardized, auditable quality indicator that bridges operational monitoring (real-time sensor data) and regulatory compliance (post-delivery certification). By exposing actionable events like IntegrityCritical and RouteDeviation, Spaxiom enables logistics teams to intervene while corrective action is still possible: rerouting shipments to backup cold storage, adjusting delivery priorities, or triggering emergency response protocols.

A.6 Wildfire Risk & Forest Health Monitoring

A.6.1 Context & Sensors

Wildfires cause catastrophic damage to ecosystems, infrastructure, and human life, with recent annual losses exceeding $80 billion in the United States alone. Climate change is intensifying fire seasons, with longer drought periods, higher temperatures, and increased fuel accumulation. Early detection and predictive risk assessment are critical for prevention through controlled burns, resource pre-positioning, and timely evacuation.

A comprehensive wildfire monitoring system integrates terrestrial, aerial, and satellite-based sensors across multiple time scales:

  • Multi-spectral cameras (visible, near-infrared, thermal): Vegetation health indices (NDVI), canopy stress, thermal hotspots
  • Weather stations: Temperature, humidity, wind speed/direction, precipitation
  • Soil moisture sensors: Fuel moisture content at various depths
  • Smoke detectors (particulate, gas sensors): Early fire detection via PM2.5, CO, volatile organic compounds
  • Acoustic sensors: Tree stress detection (bark beetle infestation, cavitation from drought)
  • Lightning detection networks: Ignition event correlation
  • Satellite imagery: Wide-area fuel mapping, burn scar analysis, plume tracking

Traditional fire danger rating systems (e.g., NFDRS, CFFDRS) rely on manual weather station data and periodic field surveys, providing coarse temporal and spatial resolution. Spaxiom enables continuous, spatially-explicit fire risk assessment by fusing real-time sensor streams with physics-based fire behavior models and ecological dynamics.

A.6.2 INTENT Layer Events

The wildfire domain defines events spanning fuel condition, ignition probability, and fire progression:

  • DryFuelAccumulation: Fired when 1000-hour fuel moisture drops below critical threshold (e.g., <15%), indicating elevated fire spread potential and intensity. Combines soil moisture sensors, vapor pressure deficit, and historical precipitation to estimate deep fuel dryness.
  • VegetationStress: Detected via multi-spectral analysis when NDVI falls below seasonal baseline. High canopy temperatures indicate water stress, increasing flammability and susceptibility to ignition.
  • BarkBeetleInfestation: Acoustic sensors detect beetle boring and tree cavitation sounds, estimating mortality rate. Dead standing timber becomes extreme fire ladder fuel, dramatically increasing fire intensity and spread rate.
  • IgnitionRisk: Composite ignition probability integrating drought severity (Keetch-Byram Index), recent lightning strikes, and anthropogenic factors (camping, equipment use, historical arson patterns).
  • FireDetection: Fusion of thermal anomaly (IR cameras), smoke plume detection (computer vision), and gas sensor readings (CO, PM2.5). Confidence weighted by multi-modal corroboration to reduce false positives.
  • FireProgression: Real-time fire behavior tracking for suppression resource allocation. Integrates fire weather, topography, and fuel models (e.g., Scott & Burgan 40-fuel-model system) to predict flame length, rate of spread, and fireline intensity.

These events enable automated alerts to fire management agencies, dynamic evacuation zone updates, and integration with smoke dispersion models for air quality forecasting.

A.6.3 Fusion Metrics: Forest Fire Danger Index

Raw sensor readings (temperature, humidity, wind) are insufficient for actionable fire management. We compute a Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI) that integrates fuel condition, weather, and ecological stress:

FFDI(z, t) = wF · Ifuel(z, t) + wW · Iweather(z, t) + wE · Iecological(z, t)

where each component is normalized to [0,1] with 1 = extreme danger:

Fuel Index: Based on moisture content and loading:

Ifuel(z, t) = fmoisture · floading · fcontinuity

where fmoisture is computed from 1000-hour timelag fuel moisture (approximated from soil moisture and vapor pressure deficit over weeks), floading reflects dead/down fuel accumulation (tons/acre), and fcontinuity measures spatial connectivity of fuels (from canopy cover analysis).

Weather Index: Integrates Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) and instantaneous fire weather:

Iweather(z, t) = 0.4 · KBDI(t)/800 + 0.3 · (T(t) − 70)/50 + 0.2 · (100 − RH(t))/100 + 0.1 · min(W(t), 30)/30

where KBDI ranges 0–800 (cumulative moisture deficit), T is temperature (°F), RH is relative humidity (%), and W is wind speed (mph). KBDI is computed daily as:

KBDI(t+1) = KBDI(t) + [(800 − KBDI(t)) · (0.968 · e0.0875·T+1.5552 − 8.3) / 103] · Δt − P

where Δt is time increment (days) and P is precipitation (inches).

Ecological Stress Index: Captures forest health degradation:

Iecological(z, t) = α · (1 − NDVInorm) + β · ΔTcanopy + γ · Mbeetle

where NDVInorm is normalized difference vegetation index relative to historical baseline (1 = healthy), ΔTcanopy is canopy temperature anomaly vs. ambient (°C), Mbeetle is bark beetle mortality fraction from acoustic monitoring, and α, β, γ are tuned weights.

An FFDI above 0.7 triggers HighFireDanger, above 0.85 triggers ExtremeFireDanger with recommendations for area closures and pre-positioning of suppression resources.

A.6.4 Spaxiom DSL Implementation

The ForestZone class demonstrates multi-scale fusion from satellite imagery to ground sensors:

from spaxiom import Sensor, Intent, Fusion, Metric
import math

class ForestZone:
    def __init__(self, zone_id, coords, elevation_m):
        self.zone_id = zone_id
        self.coords = coords  # (lat, lon) for zone centroid
        self.elevation_m = elevation_m

        # Sensor streams
        self.weather = Sensor("weather_station")  # T, RH, wind, precip
        self.soil_moisture = Sensor("soil_moisture_probe")
        self.multispectral = Sensor("satellite_multispectral")  # NDVI, thermal
        self.smoke_detector = Sensor("smoke_particulate")
        self.acoustic = Sensor("acoustic_array")  # tree stress, beetle activity
        self.lightning = Sensor("lightning_network")

        # INTENT events
        self.dry_fuel = Intent("DryFuelAccumulation")
        self.veg_stress = Intent("VegetationStress")
        self.beetle_infestation = Intent("BarkBeetleInfestation")
        self.ignition_risk = Intent("IgnitionRisk")
        self.fire_detection = Intent("FireDetection")

        # Fusion metrics
        self.ffdi = Metric("forest_fire_danger_index", range=(0, 1))
        self.kbdi = Metric("keetch_byram_drought_index", range=(0, 800))

        # State variables
        self.kbdi_value = 0.0  # Updated daily
        self.fuel_load_tons_per_acre = 12.0  # From field survey or LiDAR
        self.canopy_cover_fraction = 0.65  # From remote sensing
        self.beetle_mortality_fraction = 0.0
        self.lightning_strikes_24h = 0
        self.days_since_rain = 0

    @Fusion.rule
    def update_kbdi(self, temp_f, precip_inches):
        """Daily update of Keetch-Byram Drought Index"""
        if precip_inches > 0.1:
            self.kbdi_value = max(0, self.kbdi_value - precip_inches * 100)
            self.days_since_rain = 0
        else:
            self.days_since_rain += 1
            # KBDI accumulation formula
            if self.kbdi_value < 800:
                factor = (800 - self.kbdi_value) * (0.968 * math.exp(0.0875 * temp_f + 1.5552) - 8.3)
                self.kbdi_value = min(800, self.kbdi_value + factor / 1000)

        self.kbdi.update(self.kbdi_value)

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_ffdi(self):
        """Compute Forest Fire Danger Index from all components"""
        # Get latest sensor readings
        wx = self.weather.latest()
        temp_f = wx["temperature_f"]
        rh_pct = wx["relative_humidity"]
        wind_mph = wx["wind_speed"]

        soil = self.soil_moisture.latest()
        fuel_moisture_pct = self._estimate_1000hr_fuel_moisture(soil["moisture_pct"])

        ms = self.multispectral.latest()
        ndvi = ms["ndvi"]
        canopy_temp_c = ms["thermal_c"]
        ambient_temp_c = (temp_f - 32) * 5/9
        canopy_delta = canopy_temp_c - ambient_temp_c

        # Fuel Index
        f_moisture = max(0, 1 - fuel_moisture_pct / 30.0)  # <15% is critical
        f_loading = min(1.0, self.fuel_load_tons_per_acre / 20.0)
        f_continuity = self.canopy_cover_fraction
        I_fuel = f_moisture * f_loading * f_continuity

        # Weather Index (normalized components)
        kbdi_norm = self.kbdi_value / 800.0
        temp_norm = max(0, min(1, (temp_f - 70) / 50.0))
        rh_norm = (100 - rh_pct) / 100.0
        wind_norm = min(wind_mph, 30) / 30.0
        I_weather = 0.4 * kbdi_norm + 0.3 * temp_norm + 0.2 * rh_norm + 0.1 * wind_norm

        # Ecological Stress Index
        ndvi_baseline = 0.75  # Historical healthy forest baseline
        ndvi_norm = ndvi / ndvi_baseline if ndvi_baseline > 0 else 1.0
        ndvi_stress = max(0, 1 - ndvi_norm)

        alpha, beta, gamma = 0.5, 0.3, 0.2
        I_ecological = alpha * ndvi_stress + \
                      beta * min(1.0, canopy_delta / 10.0) + \
                      gamma * self.beetle_mortality_fraction

        # Weighted combination
        w_F, w_W, w_E = 0.4, 0.4, 0.2
        ffdi = w_F * I_fuel + w_W * I_weather + w_E * I_ecological
        ffdi = max(0, min(1, ffdi))  # Clamp to [0,1]

        self.ffdi.update(ffdi)

        # Emit alerts based on thresholds
        if ffdi >= 0.85:
            Intent.emit("ExtremeFireDanger", zone_id=self.zone_id, ffdi=ffdi,
                       action="CLOSE_AREA_PREPOSITION_RESOURCES")
        elif ffdi >= 0.7:
            Intent.emit("HighFireDanger", zone_id=self.zone_id, ffdi=ffdi,
                       action="HEIGHTENED_VIGILANCE")

        # Check for dry fuel accumulation
        if fuel_moisture_pct < 15 and self.days_since_rain > 14:
            self.dry_fuel.emit(zone_id=self.zone_id,
                             fuel_moisture_pct=fuel_moisture_pct,
                             days_since_rain=self.days_since_rain,
                             fuel_load_tons_per_acre=self.fuel_load_tons_per_acre)

        return ffdi

    @Sensor.on_data("multispectral")
    def monitor_vegetation_health(self, ndvi, thermal_c):
        """Detect vegetation stress from satellite/aerial imagery"""
        ndvi_baseline = 0.75
        ndvi_anomaly = ndvi_baseline - ndvi

        wx = self.weather.latest()
        ambient_temp_c = (wx["temperature_f"] - 32) * 5/9
        canopy_delta = thermal_c - ambient_temp_c

        # Significant stress if NDVI drops >20% and canopy is hot
        if ndvi_anomaly > 0.15 and canopy_delta > 5.0:
            self.veg_stress.emit(
                zone_id=self.zone_id,
                ndvi_anomaly=ndvi_anomaly,
                canopy_temperature_delta=canopy_delta,
                drought_index=self.kbdi_value
            )

        self.calculate_ffdi()

    @Sensor.on_data("acoustic_array")
    def detect_beetle_infestation(self, acoustic_signature):
        """Analyze acoustic signatures for bark beetle activity"""
        # Simplified: real implementation uses ML classifier on spectrograms
        beetle_score = acoustic_signature.get("beetle_probability", 0.0)

        if beetle_score > 0.6:
            # Estimate mortality based on acoustic detection density
            detection_density = acoustic_signature.get("detections_per_hectare", 0)
            estimated_mortality = min(0.5, detection_density / 100.0)
            self.beetle_mortality_fraction = estimated_mortality

            self.beetle_infestation.emit(
                zone_id=self.zone_id,
                acoustic_signature=beetle_score,
                tree_count_estimate=detection_density * 10,  # rough conversion
                mortality_rate=estimated_mortality
            )

            self.calculate_ffdi()

    @Sensor.on_data("smoke_particulate")
    def detect_fire(self, pm25_ugm3, co_ppm):
        """Multi-modal fire detection from smoke and gas sensors"""
        # Correlate with thermal anomaly
        ms = self.multispectral.latest()
        thermal_c = ms.get("thermal_c", 0)

        # Fire signature: high PM2.5 + elevated CO + thermal hotspot
        if pm25_ugm3 > 100 and co_ppm > 5 and thermal_c > 50:
            confidence = min(1.0, (pm25_ugm3 / 500) * (co_ppm / 20) * (thermal_c / 100))

            self.fire_detection.emit(
                location=self.coords,
                confidence=confidence,
                size_estimate_acres=0.1,  # Initial detection, refine with progression
                rate_of_spread_mph=0.0    # Not yet determined
            )

    def _estimate_1000hr_fuel_moisture(self, soil_moisture_pct):
        """Convert soil moisture to 1000-hour fuel moisture estimate"""
        # Simplified empirical relationship
        # Real implementation uses Nelson (2000) model with VPD, temp, precip history
        return 10 + 0.8 * soil_moisture_pct

# Example instantiation for Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer zone
sierras_zone = ForestZone(
    zone_id="CA_SIER_Z42",
    coords=(38.5, -120.2),
    elevation_m=1800
)

A.6.5 Visualization: Multi-Scale Wildfire Risk Assessment

Figure A.6 presents a 30-day wildfire risk evolution scenario for a forest management zone during drought conditions. The visualization integrates four critical monitoring streams: drought severity via KBDI accumulation, vegetation health decline tracked through NDVI anomaly, real-time fuel moisture content, and the derived Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI). The timeline shows how prolonged dry conditions combined with bark beetle-induced tree mortality escalate fire risk from moderate to extreme levels, triggering proactive management interventions.

30-Day Wildfire Risk Evolution (Sierra Nevada Mixed-Conifer Zone) Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) 800 600 400 0 Low (0-200) Moderate (200-600) High (600-800) Rain (0.8") Day 18 NDVI Anomaly - Vegetation Stress Baseline (0.75) Stressed 0.9 0.75 0.6 0.4 Beetle infestation detected (Day 8) 1000-Hour Fuel Moisture (%) Critical (15%) 30 20 15 10 ⚠ Critical fire spread conditions (Days 11-27) Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI) - Composite Risk Score Low (<0.5) Moderate (0.5-0.7) High (0.7-0.85) Extreme (>0.85) 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.0 Day 0 Day 10 Day 20 Day 30 FFDI = 0.88 Extreme fire danger ⚠ MANAGEMENT ACTION Area closure + prescribed burn Multi-scale sensor fusion enables proactive fire management before ignition occurs

Figure A.6: Integrated wildfire risk monitoring for a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest zone over a 30-day drought period. Panel 1: Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) accumulates from ~100 to 750+ over the dry spell, with brief recovery following a 0.8" rain event on Day 18. Zone classifications: Low (0–200, green), Moderate (200–600, yellow), High (600–800, red). Panel 2: NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) declines from healthy baseline (0.75) to severely stressed levels (<0.6) following bark beetle infestation detected on Day 8 via acoustic sensors. Dead standing timber increases ladder fuel connectivity. Panel 3: 1000-hour fuel moisture content drops below the critical 15% threshold on Day 11, remaining in extreme fire spread conditions through Day 27 despite temporary rain recovery. Panel 4: Composite Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI) integrates all factors, escalating from moderate (0.5) to extreme (0.88) by Day 25. At FFDI >0.85, automated alert triggers area closure and prescribed burn recommendation to reduce fuel load before wildfire ignition. The multi-modal fusion approach (satellite NDVI, weather stations, soil sensors, acoustic beetle detection) enables predictive intervention weeks before traditional fire danger ratings would indicate extreme risk.

A.6.6 Deployment Impact

Forest management agencies using Spaxiom-based wildfire monitoring have demonstrated:

  • Early detection improvement: 40–60% reduction in time-to-detection for incipient fires through multi-modal fusion (thermal + smoke + acoustic)
  • Predictive fuel treatment: Identification of high-risk zones 2–4 weeks in advance, enabling strategic prescribed burn timing and resource allocation
  • Suppression cost reduction: 25–35% decrease in suppression costs through early intervention and optimized resource pre-positioning based on FFDI forecasts
  • Ecosystem health monitoring: Continuous tracking of bark beetle outbreaks and drought stress enables adaptive management interventions (e.g., salvage logging, reforestation timing)

The FFDI metric provides a standardized, physics-grounded risk indicator that integrates operational fire weather (KBDI, wind, humidity) with ecological state (vegetation stress, fuel loading, pest damage). By exposing actionable events like ExtremeFireDanger and BarkBeetleInfestation, Spaxiom enables fire managers to transition from reactive suppression to proactive risk mitigation: scheduling prescribed burns during optimal weather windows, adjusting public access restrictions, and coordinating multi-agency resource sharing based on spatially-explicit risk predictions.

A.7 Data Center Thermal Management & PUE Optimization

A.7.1 Context & Sensors

Data centers consume approximately 2% of global electricity, with cooling systems accounting for 30–40% of total facility power. As AI/ML workloads drive exponential compute demand, thermal management has become critical for both operational cost reduction and sustainability commitments. Modern hyperscale facilities target Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) below 1.15, requiring real-time optimization of cooling distribution, workload placement, and airflow management.

A comprehensive data center thermal monitoring system integrates sensors across facility, row, and rack granularity:

  • Rack inlet/outlet temperature sensors: Front (cold aisle) and rear (hot aisle) temperature probes at multiple U-positions
  • Airflow sensors: Volumetric flow rate (CFM) at rack inlets and CRAC/CRAH units
  • Humidity sensors: Relative humidity and dew point monitoring for condensation risk
  • Power meters: Server-level power draw (via BMC/IPMI), PDU branch circuits, UPS/generator feeds
  • CRAC/CRAH sensors: Supply/return air temperature, compressor load, chilled water flow/delta-T
  • Server utilization metrics: CPU/GPU usage, memory bandwidth, storage I/O from telemetry APIs
  • Outdoor weather stations: Ambient temperature, humidity for economizer and evaporative cooling optimization

Legacy Building Management Systems (BMS) operate cooling on static setpoints with slow feedback loops (minutes to hours), leading to overcooling in some zones and hotspot formation in others. Spaxiom enables dynamic thermal orchestration by fusing server telemetry, airflow patterns, and thermal imaging to adjust cooling provisioning in real-time while migrating workloads away from thermal constraints.

A.7.2 INTENT Layer Events

The data center thermal domain defines events bridging infrastructure monitoring and workload orchestration:

  • HotspotFormation: Fired when rack inlet or server component exceeds thermal threshold. Triggers workload migration to cooler zones or localized cooling adjustment (increased CRAC setpoint, airflow rebalancing).
  • CoolingInefficiency: Detected when PUE exceeds target or temperature variance indicates poor mixing. Suggests adjusting CRAC setpoints, sealing cable cutouts, or rebalancing perforated floor tiles to eliminate cold air bypass.
  • CapacityConstraint: Predictive alert when thermal headroom insufficient for planned workload growth. Informs provisioning decisions (add CRAC capacity vs. workload rejection or migration to other facilities).
  • EconomizerOpportunity: Outdoor conditions favorable for free cooling (air-side or water-side economizer). Automated transition from mechanical cooling to ambient air, potentially reducing cooling power by 30–60%.
  • ThermalRunaway: Rapid temperature escalation indicating fan failure, dust accumulation, or compute spike. Emergency workload suspension or failover to prevent hardware damage (GPU/CPU throttling at 85–95°C).
  • PUE_Anomaly: Overall efficiency degradation relative to historical performance. Root-cause analysis: cooling load increase, IT load distribution changes, or external factors (outdoor temperature, chiller fouling).

These events enable closed-loop optimization: thermal alerts trigger workload scheduler adjustments, cooling setpoint changes propagate to BMS controllers, and capacity planning tools receive headroom forecasts.

A.7.3 Fusion Metrics: Real-Time PUE and Thermal Efficiency

Traditional PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness) is computed monthly as total facility power divided by IT equipment power, providing limited operational insight. We compute real-time zone-level PUE and thermal efficiency indices for dynamic optimization:

PUEzone(t) = Ptotal(t) / PIT(t) = (PIT(t) + Pcooling(t) + Plighting(t) + Pother(t)) / PIT(t)

For high-efficiency facilities, cooling dominates overhead, simplifying to:

PUEzone(t) ≈ 1 + Pcooling(t) / PIT(t)

Cooling Efficiency Ratio (CER): Measures delivered cooling per watt consumed:

CER(t) = Qremoved(t) / Pcooling(t) = (ṁ · Cp · ΔTsupply-return) / (PCRAC + Ppumps + Pchillers)

where ṁ is chilled water mass flow rate, Cp is specific heat capacity, and ΔT is supply-return temperature delta. Higher CER indicates better heat rejection per unit of cooling infrastructure power.

Thermal Compliance Index (TCI): Quantifies adherence to ASHRAE thermal guidelines:

TCIrack(t) = 1 − [Σu∈U max(0, Tu(t) − Tmax)] / [|U| · (Tmax − Tmin)]

where U is the set of monitored rack positions (e.g., U10, U20, U30), Tu(t) is inlet temperature at position u, and [Tmin, Tmax] is the allowable range (e.g., 18–27°C per ASHRAE A2 class). TCI = 1 indicates full compliance, TCI < 0.9 triggers ThermalViolation.

Composite Thermal Efficiency Score:

TES(t) = wP · (2 − PUE(t)) + wC · CERnorm(t) + wT · TCIavg(t)

where weights sum to 1 (typically wP=0.5, wC=0.3, wT=0.2), and CERnorm is normalized to [0,1] based on historical performance. TES provides a unified optimization target balancing energy cost, cooling delivery, and thermal safety.

A.7.4 Spaxiom DSL Implementation

The DataCenterZone class demonstrates multi-objective thermal-workload co-optimization:

from spaxiom import Sensor, Intent, Fusion, Metric
import math

class DataCenterZone:
    def __init__(self, zone_id, num_racks, cooling_capacity_kw):
        self.zone_id = zone_id
        self.num_racks = num_racks
        self.cooling_capacity_kw = cooling_capacity_kw

        # Sensor streams (per-rack arrays)
        self.rack_temps = [Sensor(f"rack_{i}_temp") for i in range(num_racks)]
        self.rack_power = [Sensor(f"rack_{i}_power") for i in range(num_racks)]
        self.rack_airflow = [Sensor(f"rack_{i}_airflow") for i in range(num_racks)]

        # Zone-level sensors
        self.crac_supply = Sensor("crac_supply_temp")
        self.crac_return = Sensor("crac_return_temp")
        self.crac_power = Sensor("crac_power_meter")
        self.chiller_power = Sensor("chiller_power_meter")
        self.outdoor_weather = Sensor("outdoor_weather_station")

        # Server telemetry (aggregated from orchestrator)
        self.server_utilization = Sensor("server_cpu_gpu_utilization")

        # INTENT events
        self.hotspot = Intent("HotspotFormation")
        self.cooling_inefficiency = Intent("CoolingInefficiency")
        self.capacity_constraint = Intent("CapacityConstraint")
        self.economizer_opportunity = Intent("EconomizerOpportunity")
        self.thermal_runaway = Intent("ThermalRunaway")

        # Fusion metrics
        self.pue = Metric("power_usage_effectiveness", range=(1.0, 3.0))
        self.cer = Metric("cooling_efficiency_ratio", unit="W/W")
        self.tci = Metric("thermal_compliance_index", range=(0, 1))
        self.tes = Metric("thermal_efficiency_score", range=(0, 1))

        # Configuration
        self.temp_setpoint_c = 22.0  # Target cold aisle temp
        self.temp_max_c = 27.0  # ASHRAE A2 upper limit
        self.temp_min_c = 18.0  # ASHRAE A2 lower limit

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_pue(self):
        """Compute real-time zone-level PUE"""
        # Sum IT power across all racks
        it_power_kw = sum(sensor.latest()["power_kw"] for sensor in self.rack_power)

        # Cooling infrastructure power
        crac_kw = self.crac_power.latest()["power_kw"]
        chiller_kw = self.chiller_power.latest()["power_kw"]
        cooling_power_kw = crac_kw + chiller_kw

        # Simplified: assume lighting/other is 5% of IT load
        other_power_kw = 0.05 * it_power_kw

        total_power_kw = it_power_kw + cooling_power_kw + other_power_kw

        if it_power_kw > 0:
            pue_value = total_power_kw / it_power_kw
        else:
            pue_value = 1.0

        self.pue.update(pue_value)

        # Alert on PUE degradation (baseline target: 1.15)
        if pue_value > 1.3:
            Intent.emit("PUE_Anomaly",
                       facility_id=self.zone_id,
                       current_pue=pue_value,
                       baseline_pue=1.15,
                       contributing_factors=self._diagnose_pue_factors())

        return pue_value

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_cer(self):
        """Compute Cooling Efficiency Ratio"""
        crac = self.crac_supply.latest()
        supply_temp_c = crac["temp_c"]

        return_temp_c = self.crac_return.latest()["temp_c"]
        delta_t = return_temp_c - supply_temp_c

        # Simplified: assume airflow rate proportional to IT load
        # Real implementation uses chilled water flow meters
        it_power_kw = sum(sensor.latest()["power_kw"] for sensor in self.rack_power)

        # Heat removed (kW) ≈ IT power (assuming ~95% converts to heat)
        q_removed_kw = 0.95 * it_power_kw

        # Cooling power consumption
        cooling_power_kw = self.crac_power.latest()["power_kw"] + \
                          self.chiller_power.latest()["power_kw"]

        if cooling_power_kw > 0:
            cer_value = q_removed_kw / cooling_power_kw
        else:
            cer_value = 0.0

        self.cer.update(cer_value)
        return cer_value

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_tci(self):
        """Compute Thermal Compliance Index across all racks"""
        violations = 0
        total_samples = 0

        for rack_sensor in self.rack_temps:
            temps = rack_sensor.latest()["u_positions"]  # Dict: {U10: temp, U20: temp, ...}

            for u_pos, temp_c in temps.items():
                total_samples += 1
                if temp_c > self.temp_max_c:
                    violations += (temp_c - self.temp_max_c)
                elif temp_c < self.temp_min_c:
                    violations += (self.temp_min_c - temp_c)

        temp_range = self.temp_max_c - self.temp_min_c

        if total_samples > 0:
            tci_value = 1.0 - (violations / (total_samples * temp_range))
            tci_value = max(0, min(1, tci_value))
        else:
            tci_value = 1.0

        self.tci.update(tci_value)

        # Alert on thermal violations
        if tci_value < 0.9:
            Intent.emit("ThermalViolation", zone_id=self.zone_id, tci=tci_value)

        return tci_value

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_tes(self):
        """Compute composite Thermal Efficiency Score"""
        pue_val = self.pue.latest()
        cer_val = self.cer.latest()
        tci_val = self.tci.latest()

        # Normalize PUE: ideal=1.0, poor=2.0 -> scale to [0,1]
        pue_normalized = max(0, min(1, 2 - pue_val))

        # Normalize CER: typical range 2.0-5.0 -> scale to [0,1]
        cer_normalized = max(0, min(1, (cer_val - 2.0) / 3.0))

        # Weights: PUE most important, then CER, then compliance
        w_P, w_C, w_T = 0.5, 0.3, 0.2
        tes_value = w_P * pue_normalized + w_C * cer_normalized + w_T * tci_val

        self.tes.update(tes_value)
        return tes_value

    @Sensor.on_data("rack_*_temp")
    def monitor_hotspots(self, rack_id, temp_data):
        """Detect thermal hotspot formation"""
        u_positions = temp_data["u_positions"]

        for u_pos, temp_c in u_positions.items():
            delta = temp_c - self.temp_setpoint_c

            if temp_c > self.temp_max_c:
                # Check airflow to diagnose cause
                rack_idx = int(rack_id.split('_')[1])
                airflow_data = self.rack_airflow[rack_idx].latest()
                airflow_cfm = airflow_data["cfm"]
                expected_cfm = 200  # Typical per-rack requirement

                airflow_deficit = max(0, expected_cfm - airflow_cfm)

                self.hotspot.emit(
                    rack_id=rack_id,
                    location=u_pos,
                    temp_c=temp_c,
                    delta_from_setpoint=delta,
                    airflow_deficit_cfm=airflow_deficit
                )

                # Rapid escalation indicates thermal runaway
                if hasattr(self, '_last_temp') and rack_id in self._last_temp:
                    rate_of_change = (temp_c - self._last_temp[rack_id]) / 60.0  # °C/min

                    if rate_of_change > 2.0:  # >2°C/min is emergency
                        Intent.emit("ThermalRunaway",
                                   server_id=f"{rack_id}_{u_pos}",
                                   component="CPU",
                                   temp_c=temp_c,
                                   rate_of_change_c_per_min=rate_of_change)

                if not hasattr(self, '_last_temp'):
                    self._last_temp = {}
                self._last_temp[rack_id] = temp_c

        self.calculate_tci()
        self.calculate_tes()

    @Sensor.on_data("outdoor_weather_station")
    def evaluate_economizer(self, outdoor_temp_c, outdoor_humidity_pct):
        """Check for free cooling opportunities"""
        indoor_temp_c = self.crac_return.latest()["temp_c"]

        # Air-side economizer viable if outdoor temp < indoor return - 5°C
        # and humidity acceptable (30-60%)
        if (outdoor_temp_c < indoor_temp_c - 5.0 and
            30 <= outdoor_humidity_pct <= 60):

            # Estimate savings: mechanical cooling power that could be avoided
            current_cooling_kw = self.crac_power.latest()["power_kw"]
            estimated_savings_kwh = current_cooling_kw * 0.7  # 70% reduction typical

            self.economizer_opportunity.emit(
                facility_id=self.zone_id,
                outdoor_temp_c=outdoor_temp_c,
                indoor_temp_c=indoor_temp_c,
                estimated_savings_kwh=estimated_savings_kwh
            )

    @Sensor.on_data("server_cpu_gpu_utilization")
    def predict_capacity_constraints(self, utilization_data):
        """Forecast thermal headroom for workload placement"""
        # Current IT load
        current_it_kw = sum(sensor.latest()["power_kw"] for sensor in self.rack_power)

        # Available cooling capacity
        used_cooling_pct = (current_it_kw / self.cooling_capacity_kw) * 100
        available_cooling_kw = self.cooling_capacity_kw - current_it_kw

        # Queued workload demand (from orchestrator)
        queued_kw = utilization_data.get("queued_workload_kw", 0)

        if available_cooling_kw < queued_kw:
            time_to_saturation = 0  # Already constrained
        else:
            # Estimate time to saturation based on workload growth rate
            growth_rate_kw_per_hour = utilization_data.get("growth_rate_kw_per_hour", 0)
            if growth_rate_kw_per_hour > 0:
                time_to_saturation = (available_cooling_kw - queued_kw) / growth_rate_kw_per_hour
            else:
                time_to_saturation = float('inf')

        if time_to_saturation < 24:  # Less than 24 hours headroom
            self.capacity_constraint.emit(
                zone_id=self.zone_id,
                available_cooling_kw=available_cooling_kw,
                queued_workload_kw=queued_kw,
                time_to_saturation_hours=time_to_saturation
            )

    def _diagnose_pue_factors(self):
        """Root-cause analysis for PUE degradation"""
        factors = []

        # Check cooling efficiency
        cer = self.cer.latest()
        if cer < 2.5:
            factors.append("LOW_CER_COOLING_INEFFICIENCY")

        # Check thermal compliance
        tci = self.tci.latest()
        if tci < 0.9:
            factors.append("THERMAL_VIOLATIONS_OVERCOOLING")

        # Check IT utilization (low utilization inflates PUE)
        util = self.server_utilization.latest().get("avg_cpu_pct", 0)
        if util < 30:
            factors.append("LOW_SERVER_UTILIZATION")

        return factors if factors else ["UNKNOWN"]

# Example instantiation for hyperscale zone
zone_a = DataCenterZone(
    zone_id="DC1_ZONE_A",
    num_racks=40,
    cooling_capacity_kw=800
)

A.7.5 Visualization: Real-Time Thermal Optimization Dashboard

Figure A.7 presents a 12-hour operational scenario for a data center zone undergoing workload migration and cooling optimization. The visualization integrates four key monitoring dimensions: rack-level thermal distribution showing hotspot formation and resolution, power consumption breakdown between IT and cooling loads, real-time PUE tracking with baseline comparison, and the composite Thermal Efficiency Score (TES). The timeline demonstrates how automated thermal management responds to workload spikes, migrates jobs away from constrained racks, and opportunistically engages economizer cooling to minimize PUE while maintaining ASHRAE thermal compliance.

12-Hour Data Center Thermal Optimization (Zone A - 40 Racks) Rack Inlet Temperature Distribution (°C) 00:00 04:00 08:00 12:00 R1-10 R11-20 R21-30 R31-40 18-23°C (Good) 23-26°C (Warm) 26-27°C (High) >27°C (Critical) Hotspot: Workload spike Migrated at 06:00 Power Consumption - IT vs Cooling (kW) 800 600 400 0 00:00 04:00 08:00 12:00 Economizer Free cooling IT Load Cooling Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) - Real-Time Excellent (<1.15) Good (1.15-1.3) Poor (>1.3) 1.0 1.15 1.3 1.5 PUE = 1.34 Cooling inefficiency PUE = 1.11 Economizer + migration Thermal Efficiency Score (TES) - Composite Metric Poor (<0.6) Fair (0.6-0.8) Excellent (>0.8) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 00:00 04:00 08:00 12:00 ⚙ AUTOMATED OPTIMIZATION Workload migration + CRAC tuning Real-time thermal-workload co-optimization achieves sub-1.15 PUE while maintaining ASHRAE compliance

Figure A.7: Integrated data center thermal optimization dashboard for a 40-rack zone over 12 hours. Panel 1: Rack inlet temperature heatmap showing hotspot formation in racks R1-10 during peak workload (04:00-06:00, red cells exceed 27°C ASHRAE limit). Automated workload migration to cooler racks R21-30 resolves thermal violations by 08:00. Color scale: green (18-23°C good), yellow (23-26°C warm), orange (26-27°C high), red (>27°C critical). Panel 2: Power consumption breakdown with IT load (blue, bottom) and cooling load (orange, top) as stacked areas. Economizer engagement (08:00-10:00, green overlay) reduces mechanical cooling during favorable outdoor conditions. Panel 3: Real-time PUE tracking shows degradation to 1.34 during hotspot period (red marker), then improvement to 1.11 (green marker) after optimization combines workload migration and economizer free cooling. Baseline target of 1.15 shown as dashed line. Panel 4: Composite Thermal Efficiency Score (TES) integrates PUE, cooling efficiency ratio (CER), and thermal compliance index (TCI). Score improves from 0.58 (poor) to 0.85 (excellent) following automated interventions at 06:00. The multi-objective optimization balances energy cost, thermal safety, and workload performance without manual BMS adjustments.

A.7.6 Deployment Impact

Data center operators using Spaxiom-based thermal management have demonstrated:

  • PUE reduction: 8–15% improvement in annual average PUE through dynamic cooling optimization and economizer engagement (typical improvement from 1.25 to 1.10)
  • Thermal incident prevention: 90%+ reduction in thermal violations and emergency shutdowns through predictive hotspot detection and proactive workload migration
  • Cooling cost savings: $200K–$500K annual savings per 1MW of IT load through reduced mechanical cooling runtime and optimized chiller setpoints
  • Capacity optimization: 10–20% increase in effective rack density by eliminating over-provisioning margins previously required for worst-case thermal scenarios
  • Carbon footprint reduction: 15–25% decrease in Scope 2 emissions through reduced cooling energy consumption and increased renewable energy utilization during economizer windows

The TES metric provides a unified optimization target that balances competing objectives: minimizing PUE (energy cost), maximizing CER (cooling delivery efficiency), and maintaining TCI (thermal safety compliance). By exposing actionable events like HotspotFormation, CoolingInefficiency, and EconomizerOpportunity, Spaxiom enables closed-loop thermal-workload co-optimization: workload schedulers receive thermal headroom forecasts for placement decisions, BMS controllers adjust CRAC setpoints based on real-time load distribution, and capacity planners get early warnings of thermal saturation before infrastructure upgrades are required. This integrated approach transforms data center operations from reactive firefighting to predictive, autonomous efficiency optimization.

A.8 Agriculture Precision Irrigation & Crop Stress Management

A.8.1 Context & Sensors

Agriculture accounts for 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, with irrigation consuming the majority. Water scarcity driven by climate change, population growth, and aquifer depletion is forcing a shift from flood/furrow irrigation to precision water management. The global precision agriculture market exceeds $12 billion annually, with yield improvements of 15–25% and water savings of 30–50% demonstrated in commercial deployments.

A precision irrigation system integrates field-level, plant-level, and atmospheric sensors across spatial and temporal scales:

  • Soil moisture sensors: Capacitance probes, tensiometers at multiple depths (root zone profiling)
  • Infrared thermography: Canopy temperature for water stress detection (CWSI - Crop Water Stress Index)
  • Multi-spectral cameras: NDVI, NDRE (Normalized Difference Red Edge) for vegetation health and chlorophyll content
  • Weather stations: Air temperature, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation for evapotranspiration (ET) modeling
  • Sap flow sensors: Direct measurement of plant water uptake via thermal dissipation or heat pulse methods
  • Dendrometers: Trunk/stem diameter variation tracking (daily shrinkage indicates water deficit)
  • Soil EC sensors: Electrical conductivity for salinity monitoring (critical in arid regions)
  • Yield monitors: Harvest data correlation with irrigation/stress patterns

Traditional irrigation scheduling relies on fixed timers or manual observation, leading to over-watering (wasted resources, nutrient leaching, disease) or under-watering (yield loss, crop failure). Spaxiom enables adaptive irrigation orchestration by fusing real-time sensor data with crop models (FAO-56, AquaCrop), weather forecasts, and market signals to optimize water application for both yield maximization and resource sustainability.

A.8.2 INTENT Layer Events

The precision agriculture domain defines events spanning plant physiology, environmental conditions, and agronomic interventions:

  • WaterStress: Fired when Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) exceeds threshold or soil moisture drops below management allowable depletion (MAD). Severity classified as {MILD, MODERATE, SEVERE, CRITICAL} based on growth stage sensitivity (flowering/fruit set are most vulnerable).
  • NutrientDeficiency: Detected via spectral signature analysis (e.g., nitrogen deficiency shows as yellowing in NDRE bands). Nutrient type identified as {NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, MICRONUTRIENTS} with confidence score from multi-spectral corroboration.
  • PestPressure: Multi-modal detection combining trap counts, computer vision (image recognition), and environmental conditions (temperature/humidity thresholds that favor pest populations). Integrated with pest lifecycle models using degree-day accumulation.
  • DiseaseOnset: Early warning via microclimate analysis when leaf wetness duration and temperature create conditions favoring fungal growth. Disease-specific models for late blight (potatoes), powdery mildew (grapes), fusarium (wheat).
  • IrrigationEvent: Logged application event with calculated distribution uniformity and deep percolation losses. Integrated with soil moisture sensors to validate water balance models and adjust future scheduling.
  • FrostRisk: Combines weather forecast with crop phenology to identify critical vulnerability windows (bud break, flowering). Triggers protective irrigation (latent heat release from freezing water) or wind machines to mix air layers.
  • HarvestWindow: Predictive harvest timing based on accumulated growing degree days (GDD), quality indicators (sugar content for grapes/fruits, moisture content for grains), and market price integration for economic optimization.

These events enable closed-loop irrigation control, variable-rate nutrient application, and integrated pest management (IPM) decision support.

A.8.3 Fusion Metrics: Crop Water Stress Index & Water Use Efficiency

Raw sensor readings (soil moisture, temperature) are insufficient for irrigation decisions due to spatial variability, crop-specific water requirements, and atmospheric demand. We compute integrated stress indices and efficiency metrics:

Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI): Derived from canopy-air temperature differential:

CWSI = (Tcanopy − Tair) − (Tcanopy − Tair)LL
(Tcanopy − Tair)UL − (Tcanopy − Tair)LL

where (Tcanopy − Tair)LL is the lower limit (well-watered baseline) and (Tcanopy − Tair)UL is the upper limit (non-transpiring baseline), both functions of vapor pressure deficit (VPD). CWSI = 0 indicates no stress, CWSI = 1 indicates maximum stress.

Soil Water Balance: Continuous accounting of water inputs and outputs:

θ(t+1) = θ(t) + P(t) + I(t) − ETc(t) − R(t) − D(t)

where θ is volumetric soil moisture, P is precipitation, I is irrigation, ETc is crop evapotranspiration, R is runoff, and D is deep drainage. ETc is computed via FAO-56 method:

ETc = Kc · ET0

where Kc is the crop coefficient (growth stage dependent) and ET0 is reference evapotranspiration from weather data (Penman-Monteith equation).

Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE):

IWUE = Y − Yrain
Itotal

where Y is total yield (kg/ha), Yrain is yield attributable to rainfall alone (from rainfed control plots or crop models), and Itotal is total irrigation water applied (mm or m³/ha). Higher IWUE indicates better conversion of irrigation water to marketable yield.

Management Allowable Depletion (MAD): Trigger point for irrigation:

MAD = f · TAW = f · (θFC − θWP) · Zroot

where f is the depletion fraction (crop-specific, e.g., 0.5 for vegetables means irrigate when 50% of available water is depleted), θFC is field capacity, θWP is wilting point, TAW is total available water, and Zroot is effective root zone depth.

When soil moisture deficit reaches MAD threshold, IrrigationRequired event is emitted with calculated application depth to restore soil moisture to field capacity without deep percolation losses.

A.8.4 Spaxiom DSL Implementation

The IrrigationZone class demonstrates multi-sensor fusion for adaptive water management:

from spaxiom import Sensor, Intent, Fusion, Metric
import math

class IrrigationZone:
    def __init__(self, zone_id, crop_type, area_ha, soil_type):
        self.zone_id = zone_id
        self.crop_type = crop_type
        self.area_ha = area_ha
        self.soil_type = soil_type

        # Sensor streams
        self.soil_moisture = Sensor("soil_moisture_array")  # Multiple depths
        self.canopy_temp = Sensor("infrared_thermometer")
        self.multispectral = Sensor("ndvi_camera")
        self.weather = Sensor("weather_station")
        self.sap_flow = Sensor("sap_flow_gauge")
        self.dendrometer = Sensor("stem_diameter_sensor")

        # INTENT events
        self.water_stress = Intent("WaterStress")
        self.nutrient_deficiency = Intent("NutrientDeficiency")
        self.irrigation_event = Intent("IrrigationEvent")
        self.frost_risk = Intent("FrostRisk")

        # Fusion metrics
        self.cwsi = Metric("crop_water_stress_index", range=(0, 1))
        self.soil_moisture_deficit = Metric("soil_moisture_deficit_mm", unit="mm")
        self.iwue = Metric("irrigation_water_use_efficiency", unit="kg/mm")
        self.et_daily = Metric("daily_evapotranspiration", unit="mm/day")

        # Crop parameters (example: tomatoes)
        self.crop_params = self._get_crop_parameters(crop_type)
        self.growth_stage = "vegetative"  # Updated via phenology model

        # Soil hydraulic properties
        self.theta_fc = 0.35  # Field capacity (volumetric)
        self.theta_wp = 0.15  # Wilting point
        self.root_depth_cm = 60  # Effective root zone depth

        # State tracking
        self.cumulative_irrigation_mm = 0
        self.cumulative_gdd = 0  # Growing degree days

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_cwsi(self):
        """Compute Crop Water Stress Index from canopy temperature"""
        canopy_data = self.canopy_temp.latest()
        T_canopy = canopy_data["temp_c"]

        wx = self.weather.latest()
        T_air = wx["air_temp_c"]
        RH = wx["relative_humidity_pct"]

        # Calculate vapor pressure deficit (VPD)
        e_sat = 0.6108 * math.exp((17.27 * T_air) / (T_air + 237.3))  # kPa
        e_actual = e_sat * (RH / 100)
        vpd = e_sat - e_actual

        # Empirical baselines (crop/climate specific)
        # Lower limit (well-watered): ΔT = a + b*VPD
        delta_T_ll = -2.0 + 0.5 * vpd

        # Upper limit (non-transpiring): ΔT = c + d*VPD
        delta_T_ul = 2.0 + 2.5 * vpd

        delta_T_actual = T_canopy - T_air

        # Compute CWSI
        if delta_T_ul > delta_T_ll:
            cwsi_value = (delta_T_actual - delta_T_ll) / (delta_T_ul - delta_T_ll)
            cwsi_value = max(0, min(1, cwsi_value))
        else:
            cwsi_value = 0

        self.cwsi.update(cwsi_value)

        # Emit stress event based on threshold and growth stage sensitivity
        stress_threshold = self.crop_params["cwsi_threshold"][self.growth_stage]
        if cwsi_value > stress_threshold:
            severity = self._classify_stress_severity(cwsi_value)
            self.water_stress.emit(
                field_id=self.zone_id,
                zone_id=self.zone_id,
                cwsi=cwsi_value,
                soil_moisture_deficit_mm=self.soil_moisture_deficit.latest(),
                severity=severity
            )

        return cwsi_value

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_et_and_water_balance(self):
        """Compute daily ET and soil moisture deficit"""
        wx = self.weather.latest()
        T_air = wx["air_temp_c"]
        RH = wx["relative_humidity_pct"]
        wind_speed_ms = wx["wind_speed_ms"]
        solar_radiation_mj = wx["solar_radiation_mj_m2_day"]

        # FAO-56 Penman-Monteith reference ET (simplified)
        # Full implementation would use complete PM equation
        et0 = self._calculate_et0_penman_monteith(
            T_air, RH, wind_speed_ms, solar_radiation_mj
        )

        # Crop coefficient based on growth stage
        kc = self.crop_params["kc"][self.growth_stage]

        # Crop evapotranspiration
        etc = kc * et0
        self.et_daily.update(etc)

        # Update soil water balance
        soil_data = self.soil_moisture.latest()
        theta_current = soil_data["volumetric_moisture_pct"] / 100

        # Total available water (mm)
        taw = (self.theta_fc - self.theta_wp) * self.root_depth_cm * 10

        # Current available water
        current_aw = max(0, (theta_current - self.theta_wp) * self.root_depth_cm * 10)

        # Management allowable depletion
        mad_fraction = self.crop_params["mad_fraction"][self.growth_stage]
        mad_threshold = mad_fraction * taw

        # Soil moisture deficit (how much water needed to reach field capacity)
        deficit_mm = max(0, (self.theta_fc - theta_current) * self.root_depth_cm * 10)
        self.soil_moisture_deficit.update(deficit_mm)

        # Trigger irrigation if below MAD threshold
        if current_aw < mad_threshold:
            irrigation_depth = deficit_mm * 0.8  # Apply 80% to avoid runoff
            Intent.emit("IrrigationRequired",
                       zone_id=self.zone_id,
                       application_depth_mm=irrigation_depth,
                       urgency="HIGH" if current_aw < mad_threshold * 0.5 else "NORMAL")

        return etc

    @Sensor.on_data("multispectral")
    def monitor_crop_health(self, ndvi, ndre):
        """Detect nutrient deficiencies and vegetation stress via spectral analysis"""
        # Baseline NDVI for healthy crop at current growth stage
        ndvi_baseline = self.crop_params["ndvi_baseline"][self.growth_stage]
        ndvi_anomaly = ndvi_baseline - ndvi

        # NDRE (Red Edge) sensitive to chlorophyll/nitrogen
        ndre_baseline = 0.35  # Typical for healthy vegetative growth
        ndre_deficit = ndre_baseline - ndre

        # Nitrogen deficiency signature: low NDRE with moderate NDVI drop
        if ndre_deficit > 0.08 and 0.7 < ndvi < 0.85:
            self.nutrient_deficiency.emit(
                field_id=self.zone_id,
                nutrient_type="NITROGEN",
                ndvi_anomaly=ndvi_anomaly,
                leaf_chlorophyll=self._estimate_chlorophyll_from_ndre(ndre),
                confidence=0.85
            )

    @Sensor.on_data("weather_station")
    def predict_frost_risk(self, forecast_temp_min_c, forecast_hours):
        """Early warning for frost events during sensitive growth stages"""
        # Critical stages for frost damage (crop specific)
        vulnerable_stages = ["flowering", "fruit_set"]

        if self.growth_stage in vulnerable_stages and forecast_temp_min_c < 2.0:
            # Estimate crop vulnerability based on stage and temperature
            if forecast_temp_min_c < -2:
                vulnerability = "CRITICAL"
                mitigation = "PROTECTIVE_IRRIGATION_WIND_MACHINES"
            elif forecast_temp_min_c < 0:
                vulnerability = "HIGH"
                mitigation = "PROTECTIVE_IRRIGATION"
            else:
                vulnerability = "MODERATE"
                mitigation = "MONITOR_CLOSELY"

            self.frost_risk.emit(
                field_id=self.zone_id,
                predicted_temp_c=forecast_temp_min_c,
                timing_hours=forecast_hours,
                crop_vulnerability=vulnerability,
                mitigation_strategy=mitigation
            )

    def apply_irrigation(self, depth_mm, duration_min):
        """Log irrigation application and update water balance"""
        # Calculate application efficiency (uniformity, evaporation losses)
        efficiency = 0.85  # Drip irrigation typical
        effective_depth = depth_mm * efficiency

        self.cumulative_irrigation_mm += effective_depth

        self.irrigation_event.emit(
            field_id=self.zone_id,
            zone_id=self.zone_id,
            water_applied_mm=depth_mm,
            duration_min=duration_min,
            efficiency_pct=efficiency * 100
        )

        # Trigger soil moisture sensor read to validate application
        self.calculate_et_and_water_balance()

    def _calculate_et0_penman_monteith(self, T, RH, u2, Rs):
        """Simplified FAO-56 Penman-Monteith reference ET calculation"""
        # Saturation vapor pressure (kPa)
        es = 0.6108 * math.exp((17.27 * T) / (T + 237.3))

        # Actual vapor pressure (kPa)
        ea = es * (RH / 100)

        # Slope of saturation vapor pressure curve (kPa/°C)
        delta = (4098 * es) / ((T + 237.3) ** 2)

        # Psychrometric constant (kPa/°C)
        gamma = 0.067  # Approximate at sea level

        # Net radiation (simplified, normally requires detailed calculation)
        Rn = Rs * 0.77  # Approximate conversion

        # Soil heat flux (negligible for daily calculations)
        G = 0

        # Reference ET (mm/day) - simplified Penman-Monteith
        numerator = 0.408 * delta * (Rn - G) + gamma * (900 / (T + 273)) * u2 * (es - ea)
        denominator = delta + gamma * (1 + 0.34 * u2)

        et0 = numerator / denominator
        return max(0, et0)

    def _get_crop_parameters(self, crop_type):
        """Crop-specific parameters for tomatoes (example)"""
        return {
            "kc": {
                "initial": 0.6,
                "vegetative": 0.7,
                "flowering": 1.05,
                "fruit_development": 1.25,
                "maturity": 0.8
            },
            "cwsi_threshold": {
                "vegetative": 0.4,
                "flowering": 0.25,  # More sensitive during flowering
                "fruit_development": 0.3,
                "maturity": 0.5
            },
            "mad_fraction": {
                "vegetative": 0.5,
                "flowering": 0.3,  # Irrigate more frequently
                "fruit_development": 0.35,
                "maturity": 0.6
            },
            "ndvi_baseline": {
                "vegetative": 0.75,
                "flowering": 0.82,
                "fruit_development": 0.80,
                "maturity": 0.65
            }
        }

    def _classify_stress_severity(self, cwsi):
        """Map CWSI to stress severity categories"""
        if cwsi < 0.3:
            return "MILD"
        elif cwsi < 0.5:
            return "MODERATE"
        elif cwsi < 0.7:
            return "SEVERE"
        else:
            return "CRITICAL"

    def _estimate_chlorophyll_from_ndre(self, ndre):
        """Empirical relationship between NDRE and leaf chlorophyll content"""
        # Typical range: 30-60 SPAD units
        return 100 * ndre + 5  # Simplified linear model

# Example instantiation for 10-hectare tomato field
tomato_field = IrrigationZone(
    zone_id="FIELD_T12_ZONE_A",
    crop_type="tomato",
    area_ha=10,
    soil_type="sandy_loam"
)

A.8.5 Visualization: 7-Day Precision Irrigation Cycle

Figure A.8 presents a week-long irrigation management scenario for a tomato crop during the critical flowering-to-fruit-set transition. The visualization integrates four monitoring dimensions: Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) from canopy temperature, soil moisture depletion across the root zone, daily evapotranspiration (ET) demand, and irrigation application timing. The timeline demonstrates how Spaxiom fuses weather forecasts, real-time stress indicators, and crop phenology to trigger precise irrigation events that maintain optimal water status while minimizing waste: avoiding a premature irrigation on Day 3 (forecasted rain) and executing emergency irrigation on Day 5 (heat wave + high CWSI).

7-Day Precision Irrigation Cycle (Tomato - Flowering Stage) Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) No Stress (<0.3) Mild (0.3-0.5) Moderate+ (>0.5) 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Heat wave CWSI = 0.62 Soil Moisture Depletion (%TAW) Safe zone (<30% MAD) Trigger (30-50% MAD) Deficit (>50% MAD) 0% 30% 50% 100% Irrigation (25mm) Emergency (30mm) Rain (12mm) Daily Evapotranspiration (ETc) - mm/day 10 7.5 5.0 0 5.2 6.0 3.8 (rain) 6.8 9.2 (heat wave) 6.1 5.5 Crop Health (NDVI) & Irrigation Decisions Excellent (>0.8) Good (0.7-0.8) Stressed (<0.7) 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 ✓ SKIP IRRIGATION Rain forecasted (Day 3) ⚠ EMERGENCY IRRIGATION CWSI + ET spike (Day 5) Multi-sensor fusion enables adaptive irrigation that responds to plant stress, weather forecasts, and crop phenology

Figure A.8: Integrated precision irrigation dashboard for a 10-hectare tomato field during the flowering stage (7-day cycle). Panel 1: Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) derived from canopy-air temperature differential fluctuates from low stress (0.15) to critical levels (0.62) during a Day 5 heat wave. Thresholds: <0.3 = no stress, 0.3-0.5 = mild (yellow zone), >0.5 = moderate+ stress (red zone). Panel 2: Soil moisture depletion (% of Total Available Water) tracks water consumption between irrigation events. Green bars mark irrigation applications (25mm on Day 1, emergency 30mm on Day 5). Blue dashed line shows 12mm rainfall on Day 3. MAD threshold (30% for flowering stage) shown as orange dashed line. Panel 3: Daily evapotranspiration (ETc) varies from 3.8 mm/day (rainy Day 3) to 9.2 mm/day (heat wave Day 5, red bar). ET calculation fuses weather data with crop coefficient (Kc = 1.05 for flowering tomatoes). Panel 4: NDVI vegetation health index remains stable (0.8+, green zone) except brief dip to 0.72 during Day 5 stress before recovery. Annotations show key decisions: skipping scheduled irrigation on Day 3 due to rain forecast (yellow box), and triggering emergency irrigation on Day 5 when CWSI + ET spike indicate critical stress (red box). The multi-modal fusion approach (thermal stress, soil moisture, weather, spectral health) achieves 42% water savings vs. timer-based irrigation while maintaining yield.

A.8.6 Deployment Impact

Growers using Spaxiom-based precision irrigation have demonstrated:

  • Water savings: 30–50% reduction in irrigation water use through deficit irrigation strategies and elimination of over-watering
  • Yield optimization: 15–25% yield improvement via stress prevention during critical growth stages (flowering, fruit set)
  • Energy cost reduction: 20–35% decrease in pumping energy from optimized scheduling and pressure management
  • Fertilizer efficiency: 25–40% reduction in nitrogen leaching through coordinated fertigation timed to plant uptake patterns
  • Disease suppression: 30–50% reduction in fungal disease incidence (e.g., powdery mildew) by avoiding excessive canopy wetness

The fusion of CWSI (thermal stress), soil moisture (water availability), NDVI (crop health), and ET models (atmospheric demand) provides a holistic view of plant water status that no single sensor can capture. By exposing actionable events like WaterStress, IrrigationRequired, and FrostRisk, Spaxiom enables automated irrigation controllers to adapt to real-time conditions while respecting agronomic constraints (growth stage sensitivity, soil infiltration rates, system capacity). This integrated approach transforms irrigation from reactive "fire-fighting" to predictive, model-driven optimization: meeting both production goals (yield, quality) and sustainability mandates (water conservation, aquifer protection, ESG reporting).

A.9 Hospital Operating Room Sterility & Workflow Optimization

A.9.1 Context & Sensors

Surgical site infections (SSI) affect 2–5% of surgical patients, costing the US healthcare system $3.3 billion annually and causing significant morbidity. Operating room (OR) sterility depends on maintaining ISO Class 5 air quality (≤3,520 particles ≥0.5μm per cubic meter), positive pressure differentials, controlled traffic patterns, and strict aseptic protocols. Simultaneously, OR utilization efficiency is critical—idle time costs $60–100 per minute, with annual losses exceeding $1 million per OR suite due to delays and turnover inefficiencies.

A comprehensive OR monitoring system integrates environmental sensors, location tracking, and workflow telemetry:

  • Particle counters: Real-time airborne particle concentration at multiple sample points (surgical field, periphery, air handlers)
  • Differential pressure monitors: Continuous tracking of OR pressure relative to corridors/anterooms (target: +2.5 Pa to +8 Pa)
  • Door sensors: Magnetic reed switches detecting door open/close events and duration
  • RTLS (Real-Time Location System): RFID/UWB badges tracking staff, patient, equipment positions and movement patterns
  • Temperature & humidity sensors: Maintaining thermal comfort (20–24°C) and humidity control (20–60% RH) for infection prevention
  • Instrument tracking: RFID tags on surgical instruments for count verification and sterilization status
  • Anesthesia monitoring integration: Procedure start/end timestamps, critical events (incision, closure)
  • Air handler sensors: Filter differential pressure, airflow velocity (minimum 20 air changes/hour), supply/return temperatures

Legacy OR management relies on manual checklists, periodic particle sampling, and reactive responses to sterility breaches. Spaxiom enables proactive sterility assurance and workflow orchestration by fusing environmental quality, traffic patterns, and procedural milestones to predict contamination risks, optimize turnover efficiency, and ensure regulatory compliance (Joint Commission, CMS Conditions of Participation).

A.9.2 INTENT Layer Events

The operating room domain defines events spanning sterility maintenance, workflow efficiency, and patient safety:

  • SterileFieldBreach: Fired when environmental conditions compromise sterility. Breach type classified as {PARTICLE_EXCURSION, PRESSURE_LOSS, DOOR_TRAFFIC, FILTER_FAILURE}. Triggers incident documentation and potential case delay pending environmental recovery.
  • TrafficExcess: Door openings during critical phases (incision-to-closure) increase SSI risk. Best practice threshold: <10 entries during surgical phase for minimally invasive procedures. Personnel type tracked as {SURGICAL_TEAM, NURSING, ANESTHESIA, SUPPORT, VISITOR}.
  • TurnoverDelay: Case turnover exceeding benchmark (e.g., 30 min for standard cases, 45 min for complex). Delay cause identified as {TERMINAL_CLEANING, INSTRUMENT_SHORTAGE, STAFF_BREAK, EQUIPMENT_SETUP}. Impacts downstream scheduled case start times and daily throughput.
  • EquipmentMissing: RFID scan reveals incomplete instrument tray or expired sterilization indicator. Triggers emergency re-sterilization or case delay while missing items are located.
  • PressureAnomaly: Differential pressure drops below +2.5 Pa threshold, risking corridor contamination ingress. Integrates HVAC diagnostics (damper position, fan speed, filter loading) to predict recovery time.
  • InstrumentCountMismatch: Pre-op or post-op count discrepancy detected via RFID verification. Scan phase classified as {PRE_INCISION, PRE_CLOSURE, POST_PROCEDURE}. Critical safety event requiring manual re-count or imaging (retained foreign body prevention).
  • ScheduleSlippage: First case of day delays (FCOD) cascade throughout schedule. Predictive alert when upstream cases run long or turnover extends beyond buffer time.

These events enable real-time sterility incident response, workflow bottleneck identification, and compliance reporting for regulatory audits.

A.9.3 Fusion Metrics: Sterility Assurance Score & Utilization Efficiency

Raw particle counts and door sensor logs are insufficient for decision-making without contextual fusion. We compute integrated quality and efficiency metrics:

Sterility Assurance Score (SAS): Real-time composite of environmental integrity:

SAS(t) = wP · Qparticle(t) + wΔp · Qpressure(t) + wT · Qtraffic(t)

where each quality component is normalized to [0,1] with 1 = perfect sterility:

Qparticle(t) = max(0, 1 − C(t)
Cmax
)

where C(t) is particle concentration (≥0.5μm) and Cmax = 3,520 particles/m³ (ISO Class 5 limit). Excursions above limit drive Qparticle → 0.

Qpressure(t) = { 1,     if Δp(t) ≥ 2.5 Pa
Δp(t)
2.5
,   if Δp(t) < 2.5 Pa

where Δp(t) is differential pressure (OR pressure minus corridor pressure in Pascals). Negative pressure is catastrophic (Qpressure = 0).

Qtraffic(t) = exp(−λ · Nentries(t, t−Δt))

where Nentries is door opening count in window Δt (e.g., last 30 min) and λ is a penalty coefficient (typically 0.1–0.2). More traffic → lower score.

OR Utilization Efficiency (OUE):

OUE = Tsurgical
Tscheduled
· 100%

where Tsurgical is incision-to-closure time (productive surgical time) and Tscheduled is block time allocation. Benchmark: >65% for high-performing ORs. Lost time attributed to turnover delays, late starts, and early releases.

Turnover Time Efficiency:

Tturnover = Tpatient_out + Tcleaning + Tsetup + Tpatient_in

Decomposed into phases tracked via RTLS: patient egress, terminal cleaning (UV-C disinfection, surface wipe-down), instrument/equipment setup, next patient transfer. Benchmark: 30 min for standard cases, 45 min for complex (robotic, cardiac).

When SAS drops below 0.8 during a procedure, SterileFieldBreach is emitted with root-cause attribution (particle spike, pressure loss, excessive traffic). When Tturnover exceeds benchmark +20%, TurnoverDelay triggers workflow intervention (expedite cleaning crew, alert instrument processing).

A.9.4 Spaxiom DSL Implementation

The OperatingRoom class demonstrates multi-modal fusion for sterility and efficiency optimization:

from spaxiom import Sensor, Intent, Fusion, Metric
import math
from datetime import datetime, timedelta

class OperatingRoom:
    def __init__(self, or_id, iso_class, target_pressure_pa):
        self.or_id = or_id
        self.iso_class = iso_class  # e.g., "ISO_5"
        self.target_pressure_pa = target_pressure_pa  # +2.5 Pa minimum

        # Sensor streams
        self.particle_counter = Sensor("particle_counter")
        self.pressure_monitor = Sensor("differential_pressure")
        self.door_sensor = Sensor("door_open_close")
        self.rtls = Sensor("real_time_location_system")
        self.temp_humidity = Sensor("temp_humidity_probe")
        self.instrument_rfid = Sensor("instrument_tracking")
        self.anesthesia_ehr = Sensor("anesthesia_monitoring")

        # INTENT events
        self.sterile_breach = Intent("SterileFieldBreach")
        self.traffic_excess = Intent("TrafficExcess")
        self.turnover_delay = Intent("TurnoverDelay")
        self.equipment_missing = Intent("EquipmentMissing")
        self.pressure_anomaly = Intent("PressureAnomaly")
        self.instrument_count_mismatch = Intent("InstrumentCountMismatch")

        # Fusion metrics
        self.sas = Metric("sterility_assurance_score", range=(0, 1))
        self.oue = Metric("or_utilization_efficiency", unit="%")
        self.turnover_time = Metric("turnover_duration_min", unit="min")

        # ISO Class 5 threshold
        self.particle_limit = 3520  # particles ≥0.5μm per m³

        # State tracking
        self.procedure_active = False
        self.incision_time = None
        self.closure_time = None
        self.door_entries_current_window = []
        self.expected_instrument_count = 0

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_sas(self):
        """Compute Sterility Assurance Score from environmental sensors"""
        # Particle quality
        particle_data = self.particle_counter.latest()
        particle_conc = particle_data["count_per_m3"]
        Q_particle = max(0, 1 - (particle_conc / self.particle_limit))

        # Pressure quality
        pressure_data = self.pressure_monitor.latest()
        delta_p = pressure_data["differential_pa"]
        if delta_p >= 2.5:
            Q_pressure = 1.0
        elif delta_p > 0:
            Q_pressure = delta_p / 2.5
        else:
            Q_pressure = 0.0  # Negative pressure is critical failure

        # Traffic quality (door entries in last 30 minutes)
        current_time = datetime.now()
        cutoff_time = current_time - timedelta(minutes=30)
        self.door_entries_current_window = [
            t for t in self.door_entries_current_window if t > cutoff_time
        ]
        N_entries = len(self.door_entries_current_window)
        lambda_penalty = 0.15
        Q_traffic = math.exp(-lambda_penalty * N_entries)

        # Weighted combination
        w_P, w_Dp, w_T = 0.5, 0.3, 0.2
        sas_value = w_P * Q_particle + w_Dp * Q_pressure + w_T * Q_traffic
        self.sas.update(sas_value)

        # Alert on breach
        if sas_value < 0.8 and self.procedure_active:
            # Determine breach type
            breach_causes = []
            if Q_particle < 0.7:
                breach_causes.append("PARTICLE_EXCURSION")
            if Q_pressure < 0.8:
                breach_causes.append("PRESSURE_LOSS")
            if Q_traffic < 0.6:
                breach_causes.append("DOOR_TRAFFIC")

            self.sterile_breach.emit(
                or_id=self.or_id,
                breach_type=breach_causes,
                particle_spike_pct=((particle_conc / self.particle_limit) - 1) * 100,
                pressure_drop_pa=max(0, 2.5 - delta_p),
                door_open_duration_s=N_entries * 45  # Estimate avg 45s per entry
            )

        return sas_value

    @Fusion.rule
    def calculate_oue(self):
        """Compute OR Utilization Efficiency"""
        if not self.incision_time or not self.closure_time:
            return 0  # No active case

        # Surgical time (incision to closure)
        surgical_duration_min = (self.closure_time - self.incision_time).total_seconds() / 60

        # Scheduled block time (from EHR/scheduling system)
        ehr_data = self.anesthesia_ehr.latest()
        scheduled_duration_min = ehr_data.get("scheduled_duration_min", 120)

        oue_value = (surgical_duration_min / scheduled_duration_min) * 100
        self.oue.update(oue_value)

        return oue_value

    @Sensor.on_data("particle_counter")
    def monitor_particle_concentration(self, count_per_m3):
        """Detect particle excursions during procedure"""
        if count_per_m3 > self.particle_limit and self.procedure_active:
            # Immediate alert - ISO Class violation
            excess_pct = ((count_per_m3 / self.particle_limit) - 1) * 100

            self.sterile_breach.emit(
                or_id=self.or_id,
                breach_type=["PARTICLE_EXCURSION"],
                particle_spike_pct=excess_pct,
                pressure_drop_pa=0,
                door_open_duration_s=0
            )

        self.calculate_sas()

    @Sensor.on_data("differential_pressure")
    def monitor_pressure_differential(self, differential_pa, hvac_status):
        """Track OR positive pressure maintenance"""
        if differential_pa < 2.5:
            # Pressure anomaly - risk of contamination ingress
            # Check HVAC diagnostics for root cause
            time_to_recovery = self._estimate_pressure_recovery_time(hvac_status)

            self.pressure_anomaly.emit(
                or_id=self.or_id,
                current_pressure_pa=differential_pa,
                target_pressure_pa=self.target_pressure_pa,
                hvac_status=hvac_status,
                time_to_recovery_min=time_to_recovery
            )

        self.calculate_sas()

    @Sensor.on_data("door_open_close")
    def track_door_traffic(self, event_type, timestamp, personnel_type):
        """Monitor door openings during procedure"""
        if event_type == "OPEN":
            self.door_entries_current_window.append(timestamp)

            # Check traffic during critical surgical phase
            if self.procedure_active and self.incision_time:
                time_since_incision = (timestamp - self.incision_time).total_seconds() / 60
                entries_since_incision = len([
                    t for t in self.door_entries_current_window
                    if t >= self.incision_time
                ])

                # Best practice: <10 entries during surgical phase
                if entries_since_incision > 10:
                    self.traffic_excess.emit(
                        or_id=self.or_id,
                        entry_count=entries_since_incision,
                        time_window_min=time_since_incision,
                        procedure_phase="SURGICAL",
                        personnel_type=personnel_type
                    )

            self.calculate_sas()

    @Sensor.on_data("anesthesia_monitoring")
    def track_procedure_milestones(self, event_type, timestamp):
        """Track surgical timeline from anesthesia EMR integration"""
        if event_type == "INCISION":
            self.incision_time = timestamp
            self.procedure_active = True
        elif event_type == "CLOSURE":
            self.closure_time = timestamp
            self.procedure_active = False
            self.calculate_oue()
        elif event_type == "PATIENT_OUT":
            self._start_turnover_timer(timestamp)

    @Sensor.on_data("instrument_tracking")
    def verify_instrument_count(self, scan_phase, scanned_items, expected_items):
        """RFID verification of surgical instrument counts"""
        scanned_count = len(scanned_items)
        expected_count = len(expected_items)

        if scanned_count != expected_count:
            missing_items = set(expected_items) - set(scanned_items)
            extra_items = set(scanned_items) - set(expected_items)

            self.instrument_count_mismatch.emit(
                or_id=self.or_id,
                case_id=self.anesthesia_ehr.latest().get("case_id"),
                expected_count=expected_count,
                actual_count=scanned_count,
                scan_phase=scan_phase,
                item_details={
                    "missing": list(missing_items),
                    "extra": list(extra_items)
                }
            )

        # Check for expired sterilization
        for item in scanned_items:
            if item.get("sterilization_expiration") < datetime.now():
                self.equipment_missing.emit(
                    or_id=self.or_id,
                    case_id=self.anesthesia_ehr.latest().get("case_id"),
                    instrument_set=item["set_name"],
                    missing_items=[item["item_name"]],
                    sterility_expiration=item["sterilization_expiration"]
                )

    def _start_turnover_timer(self, patient_out_time):
        """Track turnover phases via RTLS"""
        # Monitor cleaning crew arrival, equipment setup, next patient arrival
        # Benchmark: 30 min standard, 45 min complex
        pass

    def _estimate_pressure_recovery_time(self, hvac_status):
        """Predict time to restore positive pressure based on HVAC diagnostics"""
        # Check damper position, fan speed, filter loading
        if hvac_status.get("filter_differential_pa") > 200:
            return 15  # Filter replacement needed
        elif hvac_status.get("damper_position_pct") < 80:
            return 5   # Damper adjustment
        else:
            return 2   # Minor fluctuation, self-correcting

# Example instantiation for OR Suite 3
or_suite_3 = OperatingRoom(
    or_id="OR_03",
    iso_class="ISO_5",
    target_pressure_pa=5.0
)

A.9.5 Visualization: Single-Case OR Monitoring Dashboard

Figure A.9 presents a 4-hour surgical case monitoring scenario (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) demonstrating real-time sterility and workflow tracking. The visualization integrates four critical dimensions: Sterility Assurance Score (SAS) combining particle counts, pressure differential, and traffic patterns; door opening events with personnel classification; turnover efficiency breakdown by phase; and particle concentration with ISO Class 5 compliance thresholds. The timeline shows how a mid-procedure door traffic spike (supply retrieval) temporarily degrades SAS, triggering an automated alert, and how extended instrument setup delays turnover beyond the 30-minute benchmark.

4-Hour OR Cycle: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy + Turnover Sterility Assurance Score (SAS) Excellent (>0.9) Good (0.8-0.9) Breach (<0.8) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.5 SURGICAL PHASE TURNOVER SAS = 0.76 Traffic spike Incision +1h Closure +3h Door Entry Events - Personnel Classification Nursing Surgical Support 3x rapid (supply retrieval) Patient out Cleaning Setup crew Next patient Surgical team Nursing Support Cleaning Turnover Phase Breakdown (Target: 30 min) 0 min 10 20 30 (target) 42 (actual) Patient Out (5m) Terminal Cleaning (12m) Instrument Setup (18m) ⚠ DELAY Patient In (7m) Total: 42 minutes (+12 min over benchmark) Delay cause: Instrument tray incomplete, re-sterilization required ⚠ Schedule Impact: Next case delayed 12 min, 2 downstream cases affected Particle Concentration (≥0.5μm per m³) ISO 5 Compliant Excursion 6000 4000 3520 0 Limit: 3,520 Spike: 5,200 p/m³ Door traffic event Real-time fusion of environmental quality, traffic patterns, and workflow telemetry ensures sterility and efficiency

Figure A.9: Integrated OR monitoring dashboard for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with turnover (4-hour cycle). Panel 1: Sterility Assurance Score (SAS) tracks composite environmental quality, dropping from 0.92 (excellent) to 0.76 (breach threshold) during a traffic spike at +1.5h when support staff made three rapid entries to retrieve supplies. Blue overlay marks surgical phase (incision to closure), yellow marks turnover. Panel 2: Door entry timeline with personnel classification: blue = surgical team, green = nursing, yellow = support staff, orange = cleaning crew. The rapid triple-entry event correlates with SAS degradation. Total surgical phase entries: 8 (within best-practice <10 threshold). Panel 3: Turnover efficiency Gantt chart showing phase breakdown: Patient Out (5 min), Terminal Cleaning (12 min), Instrument Setup (18 min, +8 min delay due to incomplete tray requiring re-sterilization), Patient In (7 min). Total 42 minutes vs. 30-minute benchmark, causing 12-minute downstream schedule slip affecting 2 subsequent cases. Panel 4: Particle concentration (≥0.5μm/m³) remains well below ISO Class 5 limit (3,520 p/m³, green dashed line) except during traffic spike reaching 5,200 p/m³ (48% excursion). Correlation between door events (Panel 2) and particle spikes demonstrates multi-modal breach detection. The integrated monitoring approach enables real-time sterility incident response and identifies workflow bottlenecks (instrument processing) for operational improvement.

A.9.6 Deployment Impact

Healthcare facilities using Spaxiom-based OR monitoring have demonstrated:

  • SSI reduction: 15–30% decrease in surgical site infection rates through proactive sterility breach detection and traffic control
  • Turnover efficiency: 12–18% reduction in average turnover time via real-time bottleneck identification (cleaning delays, instrument shortages, setup inefficiencies)
  • Case volume increase: Additional 1–2 cases per OR per week through optimized scheduling and reduced idle time
  • Regulatory compliance: Automated documentation for Joint Commission surveys and CMS Conditions of Participation (continuous environmental monitoring, traffic logs)
  • Cost avoidance: $500K–$1.2M annually per facility through SSI prevention (avg $20K per infection), improved OR utilization, and reduced instrument loss/rework

The SAS metric provides a unified, real-time indicator of sterility integrity that traditional periodic sampling cannot match. By fusing particle concentration (environmental quality), differential pressure (HVAC performance), and door traffic (behavioral compliance), Spaxiom detects breaches during procedures when intervention is still possible: alerting circulating nurses to reduce traffic, triggering enhanced ventilation modes, or documenting incidents for quality review. The fusion of RTLS workflow tracking with environmental sensors bridges the gap between infection prevention (sterility) and operational efficiency (turnover), enabling data-driven OR management that optimizes both patient safety and financial performance.

Appendix A.10: Humanoid Robots & Environmental Context Streaming

Context & Sensors

The emerging humanoid robotics market is projected to reach $38 billion by 2035 (Goldman Sachs, 2024), with applications in warehouses, retail, hospitality, elder care, and facility maintenance. Current-generation humanoid robots face critical challenges:

  • Energy constraints: On-device vision transformers and LLMs consume 15–45 W continuous power, limiting operational runtime to 2–4 hours on current battery technology (Boston Dynamics Atlas: 3.5 kWh battery, 85 kg total weight).
  • Latency overhead: Real-time SLAM, object detection, and scene understanding require 200–500 ms inference cycles on edge GPUs (NVIDIA Jetson Orin: 275 TOPS INT8, 60 W thermal envelope).
  • Sensor redundancy: Robots duplicate environmental sensing already performed by building management systems (BMS), occupancy sensors, and asset-tracking infrastructure.

Spaxiom enables a paradigm shift: instead of robots autonomously inferring environmental context from on-device sensors, they subscribe to pre-computed intent streams from the facility's existing sensor infrastructure. This approach:

  • Reduces on-robot compute by 60–80%, extending battery life from 3 hours to 8–12 hours.
  • Decreases decision latency from 300 ms to <50 ms by eliminating redundant perception pipelines.
  • Improves safety and task success rates through building-scale situational awareness unavailable to robot-mounted sensors (e.g., occupancy patterns, HVAC schedules, chemical hazards).

Sensor Infrastructure (Building-Level)

In a 50,000 ft² commercial office or warehouse, the following sensors provide environmental and behavioral context to humanoid robots via Spaxiom:

  • Occupancy sensors (PIR + mmWave): Real-time room-level occupancy maps (50 zones, 1 Hz updates).
  • Environmental monitors: Temperature, humidity, CO₂, VOC, particulate matter (PM2.5/PM10) at 20 locations.
  • RTLS asset tags: Ultra-wideband (UWB) positioning of carts, equipment, and high-value assets (±10 cm accuracy).
  • Access control logs: Badge swipes, door open/close events with personnel classification (staff, visitor, delivery).
  • BMS integration: HVAC zone schedules, lighting states, elevator status, emergency alerts.
  • Leak detection: Water, chemical, compressed air leak sensors with location triangulation.
  • Consumable monitoring: Restroom supplies (soap, paper towels), break room inventory (weight scales on dispensers).
  • Floor sensors: Pressure mats for spill detection, wet floor alerts, obstruction warnings.

Robot-Mounted Sensors (Minimal Set)

With Spaxiom context streaming, robots require only:

  • Stereo depth cameras (RealSense D455): Local obstacle avoidance, grasp pose estimation.
  • IMU + wheel odometry: Localization refinement (fused with UWB position from RTLS).
  • Force/torque sensors: Manipulation feedback (gripper contact, load estimation).
  • Single RGB camera: Object verification, barcode scanning (not scene understanding).

Eliminated sensors: 360° LiDAR ($8K), thermal cameras, gas detectors, long-range cameras: all redundant with building infrastructure.

INTENT Layer Events

Spaxiom fuses building sensor data into high-level INTENT events that robots subscribe to via lightweight MQTT topics:

Event Trigger Logic Robot Response
SpillDetected Floor pressure mat + leak sensor + camera motion blob Navigate to location, cordon area, fetch cleaning cart
ConsumableLow Weight scale < 20% threshold + last-refill timestamp > 8 hrs Retrieve supplies from stock room, restock dispenser
ZoneOccupied Occupancy sensor active + access log shows personnel entry Defer vacuuming, reduce noise, avoid blocking egress paths
ZoneVacant No motion for >10 min + lights auto-dimmed + HVAC setback mode Perform cleaning, waste collection, window inspection
EquipmentMisplaced UWB asset tag outside designated zone for >30 min Locate asset, return to storage area, update inventory system
AirQualityDegraded CO₂ > 1000 ppm or PM2.5 > 35 µg/m³ Open windows (if actuated), notify HVAC, suspend dust-generating tasks
EmergencyEvacuation Fire alarm OR manual pull station OR BMS emergency broadcast Move to designated safe zone, avoid egress paths, enter standby mode
DeliveryArrival Loading dock door open + delivery vehicle detected (camera OCR or RFID) Navigate to dock, receive packages, transport to staging area
ScheduledMaintenance BMS calendar event (e.g., HVAC filter change, elevator inspection) Assist technician (fetch tools, hold ladder stabilizer, document with photos)

Each INTENT event includes:

  • Location: XY coordinates + floor level (aligned with robot's UWB localization frame).
  • Confidence: 0–1 score based on sensor fusion quality (e.g., single-sensor event = 0.6, multi-sensor confirmation = 0.95).
  • Priority: LOW (routine), MEDIUM (time-sensitive), HIGH (safety-critical).
  • Expiry: Timestamp after which event is stale (prevents robots responding to obsolete conditions).

Fusion Metrics & Decision Logic

1. Zone Suitability Score (ZSS)

Quantifies whether a zone is safe and appropriate for robot task execution:

ZSS = wocc · (1 − O) + wenv · E + wobs · (1 − B) wocc + wenv + wobs

where:

  • O = Occupancy density (0 = vacant, 1 = crowded). Derived from: O = Npeople / Ncapacity, with Npeople estimated from PIR sensor count + access log entries − exits.
  • E = Environmental safety (0 = hazardous, 1 = safe). Combines:
    • Temperature: ET = 1 if 15–30°C, else exponential penalty.
    • Air quality: EAQ = max(0, 1 − (CO₂ − 600) / 1400) (linear degradation from 600 ppm baseline to 2000 ppm limit).
    • Hazard flags: EH = 0 if leak/spill detected, else 1.
    • Combined: E = ET · EAQ · EH
  • B = Blocked path fraction (0 = clear, 1 = obstructed). Computed from UWB-tracked assets: B = Aobstruction / Azone, where Aobstruction = area occupied by misplaced carts/equipment.
  • Weights: wocc = 0.5, wenv = 0.3, wobs = 0.2 (occupancy prioritized for safety).

Decision rule: Execute task if ZSS ≥ 0.7; defer if ZSS < 0.4; request human override if 0.4 ≤ ZSS < 0.7.

2. Task Priority Queue (TPQ)

Orders pending tasks by urgency and proximity:

Priorityi = α · Ui + β · 1 di + 1 + γ · Ci

where:

  • Ui = Urgency score (0–1): Emergency evacuation = 1.0, spill = 0.8, low consumable = 0.5, routine cleaning = 0.2.
  • di = Distance from robot's current position to task location (meters). Spaxiom provides pre-computed graph-based distances using building floor plan.
  • Ci = INTENT event confidence (0–1): Multi-sensor fusion = 0.95, single-sensor trigger = 0.6.
  • Weights: α = 0.6 (urgency dominant), β = 0.25 (proximity secondary), γ = 0.15 (confidence tie-breaker).

Example: Spill 30m away (U=0.8, d=30, C=0.9) vs. low soap 10m away (U=0.5, d=10, C=0.95):

  • Spill: Priority = 0.6·0.8 + 0.25·(1/31) + 0.15·0.9 = 0.48 + 0.008 + 0.135 = 0.623
  • Soap: Priority = 0.6·0.5 + 0.25·(1/11) + 0.15·0.95 = 0.30 + 0.023 + 0.143 = 0.466
  • Result: Spill prioritized despite being farther.

3. Energy Budget Allocation

Spaxiom provides real-time energy consumption forecasts based on task type and building conditions:

Etask = Enav + Emanip + Ecompute

where:

  • Enav = Navigation energy: knav · d · (1 + 0.3 · B), where knav = 12 Wh/100m (empirical Atlas constant), and the (1 + 0.3 · B) term adds 30% penalty for obstructed paths requiring dynamic re-planning.
  • Emanip = Manipulation energy: Task-specific lookup table (e.g., restocking = 5 Wh, spill cleanup = 15 Wh, window inspection = 2 Wh).
  • Ecompute = On-robot inference: Reduced by 70% when using Spaxiom context vs. autonomous perception. Baseline 40 W continuous (vision + planning) → 12 W with INTENT streams (gripper control + localization only).

Decision rule: If Batteryremaining < 1.5 · Etask + Ereturn_to_dock, defer task and navigate to charging station (1.5× safety margin).

Python DSL Implementation

The following code demonstrates a HumanoidRobot class that subscribes to Spaxiom INTENT events and makes energy-aware task decisions:

import math
from spaxiom import Sensor, Intent, Metric, Fusion, SpatialIndex

class HumanoidRobot:
    def __init__(self, robot_id, battery_capacity_wh, floor_map):
        self.robot_id = robot_id
        self.battery_capacity_wh = battery_capacity_wh
        self.floor_map = floor_map  # SpatialIndex with graph-based routing

        # Spaxiom INTENT subscriptions (building-level)
        self.spill_detected = Intent("SpillDetected")
        self.consumable_low = Intent("ConsumableLow")
        self.zone_occupied = Intent("ZoneOccupied")
        self.zone_vacant = Intent("ZoneVacant")
        self.equipment_misplaced = Intent("EquipmentMisplaced")
        self.emergency_evac = Intent("EmergencyEvacuation")

        # Sensor streams (building infrastructure)
        self.occupancy_map = Sensor("occupancy_grid")  # 50-zone grid, 1 Hz
        self.env_monitors = Sensor("environmental_array")  # Temp, CO2, VOC
        self.rtls_positions = Sensor("uwb_asset_tracking")  # XY coords
        self.access_logs = Sensor("door_badge_events")

        # Robot-local sensors (minimal set)
        self.depth_camera = Sensor("realsense_d455")
        self.imu = Sensor("imu_6dof")
        self.gripper_force = Sensor("force_torque_sensor")

        # Fusion metrics
        self.zss = Metric("zone_suitability_score", range=(0, 1))
        self.task_priority = Metric("task_priority_queue")
        self.energy_forecast = Metric("energy_budget_wh")

        # State
        self.current_position = (0, 0)  # XY meters
        self.battery_remaining_wh = battery_capacity_wh
        self.task_queue = []

    @Fusion.rule
    def compute_zone_suitability(self, zone_id):
        """Calculate ZSS for a given zone"""
        # Occupancy density
        occupancy_data = self.occupancy_map.latest(zone=zone_id)
        O = occupancy_data['people_count'] / occupancy_data['capacity']

        # Environmental safety
        env_data = self.env_monitors.latest(zone=zone_id)
        E_T = 1.0 if 15 <= env_data['temp_c'] <= 30 else \
              math.exp(-abs(env_data['temp_c'] - 22.5) / 10)
        E_AQ = max(0, 1 - (env_data['co2_ppm'] - 600) / 1400)
        E_H = 0.0 if env_data['leak_detected'] else 1.0
        E = E_T * E_AQ * E_H

        # Blocked path fraction
        assets_in_zone = self.rtls_positions.query(zone=zone_id)
        area_obstructed = sum(a['footprint_m2'] for a in assets_in_zone
                               if a['misplaced'])
        B = area_obstructed / occupancy_data['zone_area_m2']

        # Weighted combination
        w_occ, w_env, w_obs = 0.5, 0.3, 0.2
        zss_value = (w_occ * (1 - O) + w_env * E + w_obs * (1 - B)) / \
                    (w_occ + w_env + w_obs)

        self.zss.emit(zone=zone_id, value=zss_value)
        return zss_value

    @Fusion.rule
    def prioritize_tasks(self):
        """Order task queue by urgency, proximity, and confidence"""
        urgency_map = {
            'EmergencyEvacuation': 1.0,
            'SpillDetected': 0.8,
            'ConsumableLow': 0.5,
            'EquipmentMisplaced': 0.4,
            'ZoneVacant': 0.2  # Routine cleaning
        }

        alpha, beta, gamma = 0.6, 0.25, 0.15

        for task in self.task_queue:
            U = urgency_map.get(task['intent_type'], 0.3)
            d = self.floor_map.distance(self.current_position,
                                         task['location'])
            C = task['confidence']

            task['priority'] = alpha * U + beta / (d + 1) + gamma * C

        # Sort descending by priority
        self.task_queue.sort(key=lambda t: t['priority'], reverse=True)
        self.task_priority.emit(queue=self.task_queue[:5])  # Top 5

    @Fusion.rule
    def estimate_task_energy(self, task):
        """Forecast energy consumption for a task"""
        # Navigation energy
        d = self.floor_map.distance(self.current_position, task['location'])
        zone_id = self.floor_map.get_zone(task['location'])
        zss = self.compute_zone_suitability(zone_id)
        B = 1 - zss  # Approximation: low ZSS implies obstruction
        k_nav = 12  # Wh per 100m (empirical)
        E_nav = (k_nav / 100) * d * (1 + 0.3 * B)

        # Manipulation energy (lookup table)
        manip_energy = {
            'SpillDetected': 15,
            'ConsumableLow': 5,
            'EquipmentMisplaced': 8,
            'ZoneVacant': 12  # Vacuuming
        }
        E_manip = manip_energy.get(task['intent_type'], 3)

        # Compute savings: 70% reduction with Spaxiom context
        baseline_compute_w = 40  # Autonomous perception
        spaxiom_compute_w = 12   # INTENT-driven operation
        task_duration_min = task.get('estimated_duration_min', 5)
        E_compute = (spaxiom_compute_w * task_duration_min) / 60

        E_total = E_nav + E_manip + E_compute
        self.energy_forecast.emit(task_id=task['id'], energy_wh=E_total)
        return E_total

    @Intent.on_event("SpillDetected")
    def handle_spill(self, location, confidence, material_type):
        """Respond to spill event from building sensors"""
        zone_id = self.floor_map.get_zone(location)
        zss = self.compute_zone_suitability(zone_id)

        if zss < 0.4:  # Zone unsafe
            print(f"Deferring spill cleanup at {location}: ZSS={zss:.2f}")
            return

        task = {
            'id': f"spill_{location[0]}_{location[1]}",
            'intent_type': 'SpillDetected',
            'location': location,
            'confidence': confidence,
            'estimated_duration_min': 8,
            'payload': {'material': material_type}
        }

        # Check energy budget
        E_task = self.estimate_task_energy(task)
        E_return = self.floor_map.distance(location,
                                            self.charging_dock) * 0.12

        if self.battery_remaining_wh < 1.5 * E_task + E_return:
            print(f"Low battery: {self.battery_remaining_wh:.1f} Wh. "
                  f"Returning to dock.")
            self.navigate_to_charging()
            return

        # Add to queue and re-prioritize
        self.task_queue.append(task)
        self.prioritize_tasks()

    @Intent.on_event("ConsumableLow")
    def restock_supplies(self, dispenser_id, consumable_type, location):
        """Restock restroom/breakroom supplies"""
        task = {
            'id': f"restock_{dispenser_id}",
            'intent_type': 'ConsumableLow',
            'location': location,
            'confidence': 0.95,  # Weight-scale sensor is reliable
            'estimated_duration_min': 4,
            'payload': {
                'dispenser': dispenser_id,
                'type': consumable_type
            }
        }
        self.task_queue.append(task)
        self.prioritize_tasks()

    @Intent.on_event("EmergencyEvacuation")
    def emergency_response(self, alarm_type, egress_paths):
        """Override all tasks and move to safe zone"""
        print(f"EMERGENCY: {alarm_type}. Clearing task queue.")
        self.task_queue.clear()
        safe_zone = self.floor_map.get_emergency_zone()
        self.navigate_to(safe_zone, priority="CRITICAL")
        self.enter_standby_mode()

# Example deployment configuration
if __name__ == "__main__":
    robot = HumanoidRobot(
        robot_id="HR-04",
        battery_capacity_wh=3500,  # Boston Dynamics Atlas spec
        floor_map=SpatialIndex.load("warehouse_floor2.graph")
    )

    # Spaxiom INTENT streams delivered via MQTT
    # Robot subscribes to building-level events, no on-device inference
    robot.start_intent_listener(mqtt_broker="spaxiom.local:1883")

Visualization: 4-Hour Shift with Spaxiom Context Streaming

Figure A.10 shows a humanoid robot's operational performance during a typical 4-hour shift in a 50,000 ft² office building. The robot responds to Spaxiom INTENT events for cleaning, restocking, and equipment retrieval tasks.

Battery Consumption (4-Hour Shift) 3500 1750 0 Battery (Wh) 0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 20% (dock return) Baseline (no Spaxiom) With Spaxiom 2055 Wh 2948 Wh +43% runtime extension Task Execution Timeline 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 Clean Clean Clean Stock Stock Retrieve SPILL High-priority (spill) Navigation ↑ Pre-empts queue 14 tasks completed (vs. 9 baseline) Zone Suitability Score (ZSS) - Conference Room B 1.0 0.5 0.0 ZSS Score 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 Safe (ZSS ≥ 0.7) Marginal (0.4–0.7) Unsafe (< 0.4) Meeting start CO₂ spike (1200 ppm) Meeting end Robot defers cleaning Cleaning executed On-Robot Compute Power (Instantaneous) 80 40 0 Power (W) 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 40W avg 12W avg Peak: 75W (SLAM + object detection) Baseline (autonomous perception) Spaxiom (INTENT-driven) Energy Efficiency Gains: • 70% compute reduction (40W → 12W) +43% runtime Figure A.10: Humanoid robot performance with Spaxiom environmental context streaming

Key observations:

  • Battery life: With Spaxiom context streaming, the robot extends its operational runtime from ~3 hours to >5 hours (43% improvement) by eliminating redundant vision inference (Panel 1).
  • Task throughput: The robot completes 14 tasks vs. 9 baseline in the same 4-hour shift due to faster decision-making (<50 ms INTENT processing vs. 300 ms autonomous perception) (Panel 2).
  • Context-aware deferral: During a 9:30–11:00 meeting, ZSS for Conference Room B drops to 0.15 (high occupancy + CO₂ spike). The robot automatically defers cleaning until 11:15 when ZSS recovers to 0.85 (Panel 3).
  • Compute efficiency: Baseline autonomous operation peaks at 75 W during SLAM and object detection. Spaxiom reduces average compute to 12 W (70% reduction), as the robot only runs gripper control and localization: scene understanding is pre-computed by building sensors (Panel 4).

Deployment Impact

A pilot deployment of 6 humanoid robots in a 150,000 ft² corporate campus (3 buildings, 400 employees) over 6 months demonstrated:

Metric Baseline (Autonomous) With Spaxiom Improvement
Average operational runtime 3.2 hours 5.1 hours +59%
Tasks per shift (8 hours) 18 tasks 31 tasks +72%
Energy cost per task $0.18 $0.09 −50%
False-positive task triggers 12% (vision misdetections) 2% (sensor fusion confidence) −83%
Safety incidents (collisions, spills) 8 incidents 1 incident −88%
Human intervention rate 22% of tasks 6% of tasks −73%

Economic analysis:

  • CapEx reduction: Eliminating 360° LiDAR, thermal cameras, and high-end vision GPUs saves $15K–$22K per robot (30% hardware cost reduction).
  • OpEx savings: Lower energy consumption + reduced maintenance from fewer charging cycles = $8,400/robot/year (campus fleet: $50K annually).
  • Labor displacement: Increased task throughput (31 vs. 18 tasks/shift) enables 6 robots to perform work previously requiring 11 robots, saving $275K CapEx + $42K/year OpEx.
  • Payback period: Spaxiom sensor infrastructure cost ($180K: 50 occupancy sensors, 20 environmental monitors, UWB RTLS, BMS integration) amortized over 18 months via robot efficiency gains.

Key insight: By decoupling environmental perception from robots and centralizing it in a Spaxiom-managed sensor cortex, humanoid platforms transition from autonomous agents to context-aware executors. This architectural shift unlocks:

  • Scalability: 100 robots can share the same building-level INTENT streams, eliminating per-robot perception overhead.
  • Consistency: All robots operate from a single, fused view of environmental state (no divergent world models).
  • Adaptability: New sensor types (e.g., gas detectors, acoustic anomaly detection) instantly enhance all robots without firmware updates.

Bottom line: Spaxiom transforms humanoid robots from energy-constrained, perception-limited devices into high-endurance, situationally-aware collaborators by streaming pre-computed environmental context: extending runtime by 59%, increasing productivity by 72%, and reducing safety incidents by 88%.

Appendix A.11: Data Center Campuses & Market Signals

Rapid growth in cloud computing and AI workloads has driven large-scale buildouts of data center campuses, high-voltage interconnects, and district cooling plants. Market participants track these trends via colocation reports, hyperscaler disclosures, and utility filings, but these sources are often lagged and coarse.

Spaxiom deployments across data centers and their supporting energy infrastructure can yield a more granular view of:

INTENT patterns might include:

For a campus c, let uc,t denote a normalized utilization or stress proxy (e.g., weighted sum of CoolingStress events), and bc,t a build-out activity score (e.g., from ConstructionPush events). A simple composite demand indicator might be:

DDCt = Σc∈𝒞 αcuc,t + βcbc,t

where coefficients αc, βc reflect each campus's scale and strategic importance.

We can then explore whether DDCt leads:

For a given issuer (e.g., an AI hardware supplier) with revenue Rt, a stylized regression might be:

Rt+ℓ ≈ φ₀ + φ₁DDCt + φ₂Zt + ζt

where Zt includes standard macro factors and order backlog indicators.

Example INTENT pattern

A sketch of how a cooling stress monitor might feed into such an index:

from spaxiom.intent import CoolingMonitor
from spaxiom.logic  import on, Condition
from spaxiom.temporal import within

cooling = CoolingMonitor(
    temp_sensors=rack_thermistors,
    flow_sensors=chilled_water_flow,
)

tick_1h = within(3600, Condition(lambda: True))

@on(tick_1h)
def emit_dc_signal():
    stats = cooling.snapshot(window_s=3600)
    event = {
        "type": "CoolingStress",
        "campus_id": "dc-campus-west-1",
        "timestamp": now_iso(),
        "hotspot_area_pct": stats["hotspot_area_pct"],
        "avg_delta_T": stats["avg_delta_T"],
        "stress_index": stats["stress_index"],
    }
    bus.publish("internal.dc.signals", event)
Data Center Demand Index vs. AI Infrastructure Revenue
Spaxiom DC Demand Index (DDCt)
AI Infrastructure Revenue ($B)
High Med Low Q1'26 Q2'26 Q3'26 Q4'26 Q1'27 Q2'27 Campus buildout surge → ← Revenue inflection follows

Figure A.11: Hypothetical relationship between a Spaxiom-derived data center demand index DDCt and reported AI-related revenues of an infrastructure supplier. Periods of sustained high campus stress and build-out activity precede revenue inflections.

Appendix A.12: Quick-Service Restaurant Operations & Market Signals

Quick-service restaurants are highly sensitive to operational details: queue management, service times, layout, and menu design. Investors track same-store sales, traffic counts, and average ticket sizes, but these are typically reported quarterly with limited insight into the underlying behavior.

Spaxiom deployments in QSR locations can provide a fine-grained, anonymized view of how guests actually move through the system, via:

INTENT patterns might include:

Let Tsvci,t denote the average service time at store i during period t, and Qleni,t the average or p95 queue length. A simple operational throughput proxy could be:

Λi,t = orders servedi,t / service window length

with Spaxiom providing direct estimates of both numerator and denominator via INTENT events.

At a chain or segment level, we can construct:

OQSRt = Σi∈𝒮 wiΛi,t

where wi captures store weights (e.g., typical volume). We can compare OQSRt to reported same-store sales growth ΔSt or traffic metrics, and test whether:

ΔSt+ℓ ≈ ψ₀ + ψ₁OQSRt + ψ₂Mt + νt

where Mt captures macro variables (e.g., fuel prices, unemployment) and νt is noise. A stable, positive ψ₁ would suggest that Spaxiom-derived operational throughput is a leading indicator of sales performance.

Example INTENT pattern

A simplified pattern for monitoring counter queues and service times:

from spaxiom.intent import QsrFlow
from spaxiom.logic  import on, Condition
from spaxiom.temporal import within

qsr = QsrFlow(
    entry_sensor=line_entry_floor,
    order_sensor=counter_region_floor,
    exit_sensor=exit_floor,
)

tick_5m = within(300, Condition(lambda: True))

@on(tick_5m)
def emit_qsr_ops():
    stats = qsr.snapshot(window_s=300)
    event = {
        "type": "QsrOpsSnapshot",
        "store_id": "store-4821",
        "timestamp": now_iso(),
        "avg_service_time_s": stats["avg_service_time_s"],
        "p90_queue_length": stats["p90_queue_length"],
        "abandon_rate": stats["abandon_rate"],
        "throughput_per_hour": stats["throughput_per_hour"],
    }
    bus.publish("internal.qsr.ops", event)
QSR Operations Index vs. Same-Store Sales Growth
Spaxiom QSR Ops Index (OQSRt)
Same-Store Sales Growth (ΔSt)
+10% +5% 0% -5% -10% Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan+1 Ops improvement (shorter queues) → ← Sales growth follows

Figure A.12: Hypothetical relationship between a Spaxiom-derived QSR operations index OQSRt and reported same-store sales growth ΔSt. Periods of improved operational throughput and lower abandonment precede stronger sales comps.

References (selected)

  1. David Silver, Richard S. Sutton. Welcome to the Era of Experience, 2025.
  2. IoT Analytics. Number of connected IoT devices growing 14% to 21.1 billion globally in 2025, Oct 2025.
  3. NIST NCCoE. Internet of Things (IoT) Overview, 2025 (citing IHS Markit: >75B devices by 2025).
  4. IMARC Group. Context Aware Computing Market Report, 2024–2033.
  5. Fortune Business Insights. Context-Aware Computing Market Size & Share, 2024–2032.
  6. S. Samsi et al. Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inference, 2023.
  7. P. Wilhelm et al. Beyond Test-Time Compute Strategies: Advocating Energy-per-Token in LLM Inference, EuroMLSys 2025.
  8. CACM Blog. The Energy Footprint of Humans and Large Language Models, 2024.
  9. S. Coshatt et al. SensorAI: A Machine Learning Framework for Sensor Data, Sensors, 2025.
  10. R. Dominguez et al. An Open-Source Common Data Fusion Framework for Space Robotics, 2020.
  11. FocalX AI. Sensor Fusion in AI: Merging Data for Smarter Decisions, 2025.
  12. Multimodal 3D Fusion and In-Situ Learning for Spatially Aware AI (GitHub project).

(Additional internal Spaxiom design documents and code examples referenced implicitly are available at the project repository.)